IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v9y2021i2p208-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Financial Governance: FTT Reform, Controversies and Governments’ Responsiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Aukje van Loon

    (Chair of International Politics, Faculty of Social Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany)

Abstract

The Eurozone crisis exposed the incompleteness of the Economic and Monetary Union’s governance framework thereby prompting the promotion of a multitude of reform packages and proposals. This simultaneously induced conflict among EU governments on both design and content of such reforms. In case of the financial transaction tax (FTT) proposal, which failed to garner consensus among member governments, it illustrates Ireland’s disapproval clashing with favorable German and French stances. While these governments aligned on the necessity to reform, the process of harmonizing EU financial governance proved rather difficult. In analyzing governments’ variation of reform support or opposition, the societal approach to governmental preference formation is employed. This is considerably conducive in directing academic attention to the role of two explanatory variables, domestic material interests and value-based ideas, in shaping governments’ reform positions. This article encompasses a comprehensive comparative account of domestic preference formation and responsiveness of three EU governments (France, Germany and Ireland), in the case study of the FTT, and demonstrates that the two societal dynamics are prone to have played a role in shaping financial reform controversies. By building on and contributing to Eurozone crisis literature, this approach seems appropriate in analyzing financial governance reform due to the crisis’ domestic impact resulting in increased public salience, issue politicization and an advanced role of elected politicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Aukje van Loon, 2021. "European Financial Governance: FTT Reform, Controversies and Governments’ Responsiveness," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v9:y:2021:i:2:p:208-218
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i2.3935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3935
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moritz Rehm, 2021. "Tug of War over Financial Assistance: Which Way Forward for Eurozone Stability Mechanisms?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 173-184.
    2. Aukje van Loon, 2020. "Societal Dynamics in European Economic Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Variation in British and German Governmental Stances," Springer Books, in: Marek Rewizorski & Karina Jędrzejowska & Anna Wróbel (ed.), The Future of Global Economic Governance, pages 119-139, Springer.
    3. Magnus G. Schoeller, 2018. "The Rise and Fall of Merkozy: Franco†German Bilateralism as a Negotiation Strategy in Eurozone Crisis Management," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 1019-1035, July.
    4. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Moritz Rehm, 2021. "Tug of War over Financial Assistance: Which Way Forward for Eurozone Stability Mechanisms?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 173-184.
    6. Vivien A. Schmidt, 2015. "The Eurozone’s Crisis of Democratic Legitimacy. Can the EU Rebuild Public Trust and Support for European Economic Integration?," European Economy - Discussion Papers 015, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    7. Martin J. Bull, 2018. "In the Eye of the Storm: The Italian Economy and the Eurozone Crisis," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 13-28, January.
    8. Christopher J. Bickerton & Dermot Hodson & Uwe Puetter, 2015. "The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 703-722, July.
    9. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1997. "Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 513-553, October.
    10. Manolis Kalaitzake, 2017. "Death by a Thousand Cuts? Financial Political Power and the Case of the European Financial Transaction Tax," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 709-726, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sébastien Commain, 2021. "‘Don’t Crunch My Credit’: Member State Governments’ Preferences on Bank Capital Requirements," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 196-207.
    2. Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2021. "Scrutiny or Complacency? Banking Union in the Bundestag and the Assemblée Nationale," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 219-229.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aukje van Loon, 2021. "European Financial Governance: FTT Reform, Controversies and Governments’ Responsiveness," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-218.
    2. Schirm Stefan A., 2018. "The Domestic Politics of European Preferences Towards Global Economic Governance," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 303-324, December.
    3. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    4. Brigitte Pircher & Karl Loxbo, 2020. "Compliance with EU Law in Times of Disintegration: Exploring Changes in Transposition and Enforcement in the EU Member States between 1997 and 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1270-1287, September.
    5. Beetz, Jan Pieter & Rossi, Enzo, 2015. "EU legitimacy in a realist key," Discussion Papers, Center for Global Constitutionalism SP IV 2015-802, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Anna-Lena Högenauer & Moritz Rehm, 2021. "Reforming the Institutions of Eurozone Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 159-162.
    7. Thomas Winzen & Rik de Ruiter & Jofre Rocabert, 2018. "Is parliamentary attention to the EU strongest when it is needed the most? National parliaments and the selective debate of EU policies," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 481-501, September.
    8. Silvana Târlea & Stefanie Bailer & Hanno Degner & Lisa M Dellmuth & Dirk Leuffen & Magnus Lundgren & Jonas Tallberg & Fabio Wasserfallen, 2019. "Explaining governmental preferences on Economic and Monetary Union Reform," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 24-44, March.
    9. Benczes, István, 2021. "Integráció és integrációelmélet a közgazdaság-tudomány perspektívájából. Halmai Péter: Mélyintegráció. A Gazdasági és Monetáris Unió ökonómiája. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 2020, 538 o [Integration ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 440-449.
    10. Sébastien Commain, 2021. "‘Don’t Crunch My Credit’: Member State Governments’ Preferences on Bank Capital Requirements," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 196-207.
    11. Francesco Nicoli, 2017. "Hard-line Euroscepticism and the Eurocrisis: Evidence from a Panel Study of 108 Elections Across Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 312-331, March.
    12. Brigitte Pircher & Mike Farjam, 2021. "Oppositional voting in the Council of the EU between 2010 and 2019: Evidence for differentiated politicisation," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 472-494, September.
    13. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    14. Benczes, István, 2018. "Az euróövezet válságrendezése a liberális kormányköziség elméletének értelmezésében [Crisis management in the Euro Zone from the perspective of liberal inter-governmentalism]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 923-948.
    15. Clément Fontan & David Howarth, 2021. "The European Central Bank and the German Constitutional Court: Police Patrols and Fire Alarms," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 241-251.
    16. Christian Kreuder-Sonnen, 2016. "Beyond Integration Theory: The (Anti-)Constitutional Dimension of European Crisis Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1350-1366, November.
    17. Markus Gastinger, 2021. "Introducing the EU exit index measuring each member state’s propensity to leave the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 566-585, September.
    18. Lindner, Vincent & Eckert, Sandra & Nölke, Andreas, 2022. "Political science research on the reasons for the (non) adoption and (non) implementation of EMU reform proposals: The state of the art," SAFE Working Paper Series 339, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    19. Marta Migliorati, 2020. "The Post‐agencification Stage between Reforms and Crises. A Comparative Assessment of EU agencies' Budgetary Development," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1393-1412, November.
    20. Joerges, Christian & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, 2016. "Europe and European studies in crisis: Inter-disciplinary and intra-disciplinary schisms in legal and political science," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2016-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v9:y:2021:i:2:p:208-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.