IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v8y2020i4p220-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of Disaster Risk Governance and Neo-Extractivism in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Pereira Covarrubias

    (Research Center for Integrated Disaster Risk Management (CIGIDEN), Chile)

  • Emmanuel Raju

    (Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark / Copenhagen Centre for Disaster Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Latin America is one of the regions facing many disasters with some of the worse impacts. The current governance model has not proven successful in disaster risk reduction. This article aims to theoretically analyse the relationship between ideal regional disaster risk governance (DRG) and the actual production of disaster risk in Latin America. From the so-called ‘vulnerability paradigm’ and a regional standpoint, this analysis contributes to the debate with a specific focus on ‘neo-extractivism.’ Pointing mainly to sociopolitical processes triggered as of the early 2000s in Latin America, ‘neo-extractivism’ relates to a regional ecological-political pattern of intensive natural resource exploitation. The first part of this article presents a regional overview of DRG and its scope in disaster risk reduction, analysing its ineffectiveness through the lens of the neoliberal governmentality problem. The second part deals with the issue of ‘neo-extractivism’ to outline the actual links between the political arena, the development discourse, and the creation of vulnerability and new hazards in the region’s contemporary social processes. We show a correlation between political arrangements and environmental degradation that brings about both disasters and an increase in disaster risk. ‘Neo-extractivism’ foregrounds the political conditions for the implementation of regional DRG and reveals how its projections within the development discourse relate incongruously with the essential factors of disaster risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Pereira Covarrubias & Emmanuel Raju, 2020. "The Politics of Disaster Risk Governance and Neo-Extractivism in Latin America," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 220-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:4:p:220-231
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicente Sandoval & Martin Voss, 2016. "Disaster Governance and Vulnerability: The Case of Chile," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 107-116.
    2. Alejandro Barragán-Ocaña & Gerardo Reyes-Ruiz & Samuel Olmos-Peña & Hortensia Gómez-Viquez, 2019. "Production, commercialization, and intellectual property of transgenic crops in Latin America," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 333-351, September.
    3. Vicente Sandoval & Martin Voss, 2016. "Disaster Governance and Vulnerability: The Case of Chile," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 107-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naim Kapucu & Abdul-Akeem Sadiq, 2016. "Disaster Policies and Governance: Promoting Community Resilience," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 58-61.
    2. Jessica Field, 2020. "Caught between Paper Plans and Kashmir Politics: Disaster Governance in Ladakh, India," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 355-365.
    3. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "Planning for Exclusion: The Politics of Urban Disaster Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 244-255.
    4. Jonathan R. Barton & Felipe Gutiérrez-Antinopai & Miguel Escalona Ulloa, 2021. "Adaptive Capacity as Local Sustainable Development: Contextualizing and Comparing Risks and Resilience in Two Chilean Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Stefan Greiving & Leonie Schödl & Karl-Heinz Gaudry & Iris Katherine Quintana Miralles & Benjamín Prado Larraín & Mark Fleischhauer & Myriam Margoth Jácome Guerra & Jonathan Tobar, 2021. "Multi-Risk Assessment and Management—A Comparative Study of the Current State of Affairs in Chile and Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "Planning for Exclusion: The Politics of Urban Disaster Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 244-255.
    7. Patrizia I. Duda & Ilan Kelman, 2022. "Informal Disaster Diplomacy," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Disrupting Risk Governance? A Post-Disaster Politics of Inclusion in the Urban Margins," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 274-283.
    9. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Disrupting Risk Governance? A Post-Disaster Politics of Inclusion in the Urban Margins," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 274-283.
    10. Jessica Field, 2020. "Caught between Paper Plans and Kashmir Politics: Disaster Governance in Ladakh, India," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 355-365.
    11. Andrés Pereira Covarrubias & Emmanuel Raju, 2020. "The Politics of Disaster Risk Governance and Neo-Extractivism in Latin America," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 220-231.
    12. Naim Kapucu & Abdul-Akeem Sadiq, 2016. "Disaster Policies and Governance: Promoting Community Resilience," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 58-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:4:p:220-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.