IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i3p153-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is Important When We Evaluate Movies? Insights from Computational Analysis of Online Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Frank M. Schneider

    (Institute for Media and Communication Studies, University of Mannheim, Germany)

  • Emese Domahidi

    (Institute for Media and Communication Science, TU Ilmenau, Germany)

  • Felix Dietrich

    (Institute for Media and Communication Studies, University of Mannheim, Germany)

Abstract

The question of what is important when we evaluate movies is crucial for understanding how lay audiences experience and evaluate entertainment products such as films. In line with this, subjective movie evaluation criteria (SMEC) have been conceptualized as mental representations of important attitudes toward specific film features. Based on exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of self-report data from online surveys, previous research has found and validated eight dimensions. Given the large-scale evaluative information that is available in online users’ comments in movie databases, it seems likely that what online users write about movies may enrich our knowledge about SMEC. As a first fully exploratory attempt, drawing on an open-source dataset including movie reviews from IMDb, we estimated a correlated topic model to explore the underlying topics of those reviews. In 35,136 online movie reviews, the most prevalent topics tapped into three major categories—Hedonism, Actors’ Performance, and Narrative—and indicated what reviewers mostly wrote about. Although a qualitative analysis of the reviews revealed that users mention certain SMEC, results of the topic model covered only two SMEC: Story Innovation and Light-heartedness. Implications for SMEC and entertainment research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank M. Schneider & Emese Domahidi & Felix Dietrich, 2020. "What Is Important When We Evaluate Movies? Insights from Computational Analysis of Online Reviews," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 153-163.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:153-163
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i3.3134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3134
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:153-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.