IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v4y2016i4p75-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Jukka Jouhki

    (Department of History and Ethnology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Epp Lauk

    (Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Maija Penttinen

    (Department of History and Ethnology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Niina Sormanen

    (Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Turo Uskali

    (Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

Abstract

This article analyzes the ethical discussion focusing on the Facebook emotional contagion experiment published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2014. The massive-scale experiment manipulated the News Feeds of a large amount of Facebook users and was successful in proving that emotional contagion happens also in online environments. However, the experiment caused ethical concerns within and outside academia mainly for two intertwined reasons, the first revolving around the idea of research as manipulation, and the second focusing on the problematic definition of informed consent. The article concurs with recent research that the era of social media and big data research are posing a significant challenge to research ethics, the practice and views of which are grounded in the pre social media era, and reflect the classical ethical stances of utilitarianism and deontology.

Suggested Citation

  • Jukka Jouhki & Epp Lauk & Maija Penttinen & Niina Sormanen & Turo Uskali, 2016. "Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 75-85.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v4:y:2016:i:4:p:75-85
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v4i4.579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/579
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v4i4.579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle N. Meyer, 2014. "Misjudgements will drive social trials underground," Nature, Nature, vol. 511(7509), pages 265-265, July.
    2. Bradford W. Hesse & Richard P. Moser & William T. Riley, 2015. "From Big Data to Knowledge in the Social Sciences," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 16-32, May.
    3. Robert M. Bond & Christopher J. Fariss & Jason J. Jones & Adam D. I. Kramer & Cameron Marlow & Jaime E. Settle & James H. Fowler, 2012. "A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 295-298, September.
    4. Dhavan V. Shah & Joseph N. Cappella & W. Russell Neuman, 2015. "Big Data, Digital Media, and Computational Social Science," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 6-13, May.
    5. Abdullahi Dahir Ahmed & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2010. "Literature Review," Contributions to Economics, in: Financial Liberalization in Developing Countries, chapter 0, pages 69-90, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan Gerber & Mitchell Hoffman & John Morgan & Collin Raymond, 2020. "One in a Million: Field Experiments on Perceived Closeness of the Election and Voter Turnout," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 287-325, July.
    2. Ruyi Ge & Juan Feng & Bin Gu, 2016. "Borrower’s default and self-disclosure of social media information in P2P lending," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, December.
    3. Jiang, Lincheng & Zhao, Xiang & Ge, Bin & Xiao, Weidong & Ruan, Yirun, 2019. "An efficient algorithm for mining a set of influential spreaders in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 58-65.
    4. Yann Algan & Quoc-Anh Do & Nicolò Dalvit & Alexis Le Chapelain & Yves Zenou, 2015. "How Social Networks Shape Our Beliefs: A Natural Experiment among Future French Politicians," Working Papers hal-03459820, HAL.
    5. Daniele Barchiesi & Helen Susannah Moat & Christian Alis & Steven Bishop & Tobias Preis, 2015. "Quantifying International Travel Flows Using Flickr," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-8, July.
    6. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/78vacv4udu92eq3fec89svm9uv is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Julian Freitag & Anna Kerkhof & Johannes Münster, 2021. "Selective sharing of news items and the political position of news outlets," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 056, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    8. Donati, Dante, 2023. "Mobile Internet access and political outcomes: Evidence from South Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Yuho Chung & Yiwei Li & Jianmin Jia, 2021. "Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 925-946, September.
    10. Liberini, Federica & Redoano, Michela & Russo, Antonio & Cuevas, Angel & Cuevas, Ruben, 2018. "Politics in the Facebook Era Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Elections," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 389, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    11. DiTraglia, Francis J. & García-Jimeno, Camilo & O’Keeffe-O’Donovan, Rossa & Sánchez-Becerra, Alejandro, 2023. "Identifying causal effects in experiments with spillovers and non-compliance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1589-1624.
    12. Shota Saito & Yoshito Hirata & Kazutoshi Sasahara & Hideyuki Suzuki, 2015. "Tracking Time Evolution of Collective Attention Clusters in Twitter: Time Evolving Nonnegative Matrix Factorisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Komatsu, Hidenori & Nishio, Ken-ichiro, 2015. "An experimental study on motivational change for electricity conservation by normative messages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 35-43.
    14. Borondo, J. & Morales, A.J. & Benito, R.M. & Losada, J.C., 2014. "Mapping the online communication patterns of political conversations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 414(C), pages 403-413.
    15. Han Woo Park, 2014. "Mapping election campaigns through negative entropy: Triple and Quadruple Helix approach to South Korea’s 2012 presidential election," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 187-197, April.
    16. Jae Yeon Kim & Jaeung Sim & Daegon Cho, 2023. "Identity and Status: When Counterspeech Increases Hate Speech Reporting and Why," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1683-1694, October.
    17. James E. Alt & Amalie Jensen & Horacio Larreguy & David D. Lassen & John Marshall, 2022. "Diffusing Political Concerns: How Unemployment Information Passed between Social Ties Influences Danish Voters," Post-Print hal-03566206, HAL.
    18. Puschmann, Cornelius & Bozdag, Engin, 2014. "Staking out the unclear ethical terrain of online social experiments," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15.
    19. Jan Trzaskowski, 2022. "Data-driven value extraction and human well-being under EU law," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 447-458, June.
    20. Anna Kerkhof, 2020. "Advertising and Content Differentiation: Evidence from YouTube," CESifo Working Paper Series 8697, CESifo.
    21. Christian M Alis & May T Lim & Helen Susannah Moat & Daniele Barchiesi & Tobias Preis & Steven R Bishop, 2015. "Quantifying Regional Differences in the Length of Twitter Messages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v4:y:2016:i:4:p:75-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.