IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i1p31-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Bernhard

    (Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA), University of Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Daniel Kübler

    (Institute of Political Studies, University of Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

Despite the growing importance of new technologies, research on individual opinion formation in the digital domain is still in its infancy. This article empirically examines citizens’ use of social media in the context of direct democracy. Based on previous work, we expect men to form their opinions on social media more frequently than women (gender gap hypothesis). In the second step, we focus on the contextual level by examining the role campaigns play in reducing this discrepancy. More specifically, we hypothesize that the presumed gender gap narrows in accordance with the increasing intensity of public debates that precede ballots (interaction hypothesis). The empirical analysis draws on 13 post-ballot surveys held at Switzerland’s federal level from 2016 to 2020 and supports both the gender gap and the interaction hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Bernhard & Daniel Kübler, 2023. "Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 31-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:1:p:31-42
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6051
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:1:p:31-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.