IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v55y2002i18p21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Das deutsche Gesundheitswesen: Reformvorstellungen der politischen Parteien und der Gesundheitsökonomen

Author

Listed:
  • Rigmar Osterkamp

Abstract

Unstrittig ist, dass das deutsche Gesundheitswesen dringender Reformen bedarf. Die Meinungen in der Politik, bei den Interessengruppen und in der Wissenschaft darüber, wo die Reformen ansetzen und in welche Richtung sie gehen sollen, divergieren aber erheblich, zum Teil sind die Unterschiede fundamental. Daher erscheint es zu Beginn der Legislaturperiode angebracht, die Probleme des deutschen Gesundheitswesens noch einmal zusammenfassend darzustellen, sie durch Beispiele sowie durch die Angabe (einiger) ihrer Ursachen zu charakterisieren und die Reformvorschläge bzw. Reformvorhaben der relevanten politischen Parteien mit den Vorschlägen von Gesundheitsökonomen zu vergleichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Rigmar Osterkamp, 2002. "Das deutsche Gesundheitswesen: Reformvorstellungen der politischen Parteien und der Gesundheitsökonomen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(18), pages 21-29, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:55:y:2002:i:18:p:21-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2002_18_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rigmar Osterkamp, 2002. "Warten auf Operationen - ein internationaler Vergleich," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(10), pages 14-21, May.
    2. Dieter Cassel, 2001. "Das deutsche Gesundheitswesen in der Dauerkrise - fehlt der Mut zu radikalen Reformen?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(16), pages 03-07, October.
    3. Rigmar Osterkamp, 2001. "The German Health Care System in an International Comparison: Assessments and Reform Options," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(03), pages 56-63, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rigmar Osterkamp, 2003. "Reform des deutschen Gesundheitswesens: Bürgerversicherung oder Pauschalbeiträge?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 56(10), pages 11-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneider, Julia & Beblo, Miriam, 2010. "Health at work - indicators and determinants : a revised literature and data review for Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 201017, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    2. Rigmar Osterkamp, 2002. "Warten auf Operationen - ein internationaler Vergleich," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(10), pages 14-21, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:55:y:2002:i:18:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.