IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifofor/v17y2016i01p77-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Market Economy Status and European Anti-Dumping Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander-Nikolai Sandkamp
  • Erdal Yalcin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander-Nikolai Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2016. "China’s Market Economy Status and European Anti-Dumping Regulation," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(01), pages 77-85, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:17:y:2016:i:01:p:77-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/forum-2016-1-sandkamp-yalcin-china-march.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elsa Leromain & Gianluca Orefice, 2014. "New revealed comparative advantage index: Dataset and empirical distribution," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 139, pages 48-70.
    2. Lu, Yi & Tao, Zhigang & Zhang, Yan, 2013. "How do exporters respond to antidumping investigations?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 290-300.
    3. Francisco Urdinez & Gilmar Masiero, 2015. "China and the WTO: Will the Market Economy Status Make Any Difference after 2016?," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 155-172, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iulia Monica Oehler-Şincai, 2018. "A Reconfiguration Of Sino-Eu Relations Under New Circumstances?," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 6(2), pages 129-139, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2021. "Different antidumping legislations within the WTO: What can we learn from China's varying market economy status?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1121-1147, November.
    2. Sandkamp, Alexander, 2020. "The trade effects of antidumping duties: Evidence from the 2004 EU enlargement," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Alexander-Nikolai Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2016. "Chinas Marktwirtschaftsstatus und die Anti-Dumping-Gesetzgebung der EU," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(04), pages 50-59, February.
    4. Beňo, Michal, 2021. "E-working: Country Versus Culture Dimension," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 13(2), June.
    5. Alessandro Barattieri & Matteo Cacciatore, 2023. "Self-Harming Trade Policy? Protectionism and Production Networks," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 97-128, April.
    6. Metiu, Norbert, 2021. "Anticipation effects of protectionist U.S. trade policies," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Chung, Yessica C.Y. & Kunene, Noxolo & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2024. "Renewable energy certificates and firm value: Empirical evidence in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Haas, Levi & Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus R., 2019. "International Trade: Smarten up to talk the talk," MPRA Paper 99096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Li, Wanli & Li, Yue & Jacoby, Gady & Wu, Zhenyu, 2022. "Antidumping, firm performance, and subsequent responses," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Dany Bahar & Andreas Hauptmann & Cem Özgüzel & Hillel Rapoport, 2019. "Migration and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: The Effect of Returning Refugees on Export Performance in the Former Yugoslavia," Working Papers 2019-12, CEPII research center.
    11. Gustavo de Souza & Naiyuan Hu & Haishi Li & Yuan Mei, 2023. "(Trade) War and Peace: How to Impose International Trade Sanctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 10477, CESifo.
    12. Minsoo Lee & Donghyun Park & Antonio Saravia, 2017. "Trade Effects of US Antidumping Actions against China-super-," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 3-16, March.
    13. Gianluca Orefice & Hillel Rapoport & Gianluca Santoni, 2021. "How Do Immigrants Promote Exports? Networks, Knowledge, Diversity," CESifo Working Paper Series 9288, CESifo.
    14. Fertö, I., 2018. "Global Agri-food Trade Competitiveness: Gross Versus Value Added Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(4), December.
    15. Sandra Poncet & Felipe Starosta de Waldemar, 2015. "Product Relatedness and Firm Exports in China," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(3), pages 579-605.
    16. Zhou, Kuo & Wang, Qiaochu & Tao, Yunqing & Li, Xiaofan, 2024. "Information infrastructure construction and firm export performance in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    17. Falkowski Krzysztof, 2017. "Long-Term Comparative Advantages of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States in International Trade," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 53(4), pages 27-49, December.
    18. Maryna Kovbatiuk & George Kovbatiuk & Viktoriia Shkliar, 2023. "The Model Of Assessment Of Goods Exports Of Ukraine To The World Integration Associations," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 9(1).
    19. Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee & Tatchawan Kanitpong, 2019. "Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Thailand-China Commodity Trade: Evidence From 45 Industries," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 203-231, May.
    20. Crowley, Meredith & Meng, Ning & Song, Huasheng, 2018. "Tariff scares: Trade policy uncertainty and foreign market entry by Chinese firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 96-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU-Wettbewerbsrecht; Antidumping; Marktwirtschaft; WTO-Recht; Gesetzgebung; China; Eurozone; USA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofor:v:17:y:2016:i:01:p:77-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.