IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2016v1p62-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional And Conjunctural Factors Action On Autonomy In Local Public Administration Management

Author

Listed:
  • SCUTARIU PETRONELA

    (STEFAN CEL MARE, UNIVERSITY OF SUCEAVA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Component without which the function of local public administration management would be compromised, administrative autonomy manifests under the action of various factors. From such an angle, the space of this article is dedicated to identifying the factors affecting the autonomy in management of local public administration in order to show their actions on its manifestation. By developing the present approach, beyond the incompleteness of the existing explanations relative to this sphere of interest, we have identified and highlighted the action of two sets of factors - institutional and conjunctural. Ensign turned out to be the action that institutional factors exert on autonomy, the latter being the greater, as the local administrative structure is higher, as the number of local public services is higher, when there are legal regulations that warrant it, and vice versa. Then analyzing conjunctural factors, we found that the influence of the economic crisis is, as expected, adverse to autonomy manifestation. Regarding the local development factor, we showed that a local community with a high degree of development functions without the intervention of center, a situation that favors autonomy, as opposed to a less developed community that requires the support of the center, intervention which mitigates the autonomy. By examining the action of political factor, we noticed that, although politicians define public strategies and policies that will be implemented, which gives it a positive connotation, most often autonomy suffers under the politics influence. Finally, the social organization in local collectivities provides favorable ground to the manifestation and functioning of autonomy in the management of local public administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Scutariu Petronela, 2016. "Institutional And Conjunctural Factors Action On Autonomy In Local Public Administration Management," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 62-68, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:1:p:62-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2016-01/09_Scutariu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Paulais, 2009. "Local Governments and the Financial Crisis : An Analysis," World Bank Publications - Reports 15782, The World Bank Group.
    2. Kutsal Yesilkagit & Sandra Thiel, 2008. "Political Influence and Bureaucratic Autonomy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 137-153, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    2. Chris Hanretty & Christel Koop, 2013. "Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 195-214, June.
    3. Dethier, Jean-Jacques & Morrill, Curtis, 2012. "The great recession and the future of cities," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6256, The World Bank.
    4. Namonda Kwibisa & Safaa Majzoub, 2018. "Challenges Faced in Inter-Organizational Collaboration Process. A Case Study of Region Skåne," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 1-34, September.
    5. Sonia D. Gatchair, 2020. "Towards a Model for Independent Fiscal Policy Oversight in a Small Island State," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 703-718, December.
    6. Luigi Burroni, 2014. "Competitive regionalism and the territorial governance of uncertainty," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 83-97, February.
    7. Pérez López, Gemma & Plata Díaz, Ana María & Zafra Gómez, José L. & López Hernández, Antonio M., 2013. "Deuda viva municipal en un contexto de crisis económica: análisis de los factores determinantes y de las formas de gestión," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 83-93.
    8. Anand, Vaijayanthee & Verma, Luv & Santhanam, Nivethitha & Grover, Atipriya, 2022. "Turnover intention among Indian police: Do organizational and community stressors matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Hyunjung Ji & Jeong Ahn & Jeffrey Chapman, 2016. "The role of intergovernmental aid in defining fiscal sustainability at the sub-national level," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3063-3081, November.
    10. Sandra Thiel & Zeger Wal, 2010. "Birds of a Feather? The Effect of Organizational Value Congruence on the Relationship Between Ministries and Quangos," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 377-397, December.
    11. Abbott, Malcolm & Ma, Xiaoying, 2013. "The regulatory governance of the telecommunication and electricity industries in small, island nations," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 7-16.
    12. Helena Wockelberg & Shirin Ahlbäck Öberg, 2022. "Agency Autonomy and Organizational Interaction," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1045-1062, December.
    13. Astrid Molenveld & Koen Verhoest & Jan Wynen, 2021. "Why public organizations contribute to crosscutting policy programs: the role of structure, culture, and ministerial control," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 123-154, March.
    14. Kristin Reichborn-Kjennerud, 2015. "Resistance to Control—Norwegian Ministries’ and Agencies’ Reactions to Performance Audit," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 17-32, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:1:p:62-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.