IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v52y2006i8id3454-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre- and post-anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • A. Gunes

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • N. Cicek

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • A. Inal

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • M. Alpaslan

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • F. Eraslan

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • E. Guneri

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • T. Guzelordu

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey)

Abstract

Uptake of mineral nutrients in chickpea cultivars might be an important response in drought tolerance. An experiment under controlled conditions was carried out to study the genotypic response of 11 chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought and its relations with N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn and B uptake and uptake efficiency. Plants were grown either optimal or drought stress implemented at pre- (early drought stress, EDS) and post-anthesis (late drought stress, LDS) stages. Growth reduction of the cultivars as a response to drought significantly differed. The results of the study indicated that EDS had less detrimental effects on growth and nutrient uptake than LDS conditions. In general, drought tolerant chickpea cultivars accumulated more N, P, K, Ca, Zn, Mn and B in both drought stress treatments except for Zn and Mn uptake in LDS treatment. The total nutrient uptake efficiency of the cultivars were also very significantly correlated with the growth reduction ration (GR) both in EDS and LDS treatments giving correlation coefficients (r) of -7859 and -0.7678, p < 0.01, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Gunes & N. Cicek & A. Inal & M. Alpaslan & F. Eraslan & E. Guneri & T. Guzelordu, 2006. "Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre- and post-anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efficiency," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(8), pages 368-376.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:52:y:2006:i:8:id:3454-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/3454-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3454-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3454-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3454-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J. W. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M. & Oweis, T. & Malhotra, R. S., 2001. "Response to soil salinity of two chickpea varieties differing in drought tolerance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 83-96, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Hoorn, J. W. & Katerji, N. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M., 2001. "Effect of salinity on yield and nitrogen uptake of four grain legumes and on biological nitrogen contribution from the soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 87-98, October.
    2. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J.W. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M. & Fares, C. & Ceccarelli, S. & Grando, S. & Oweis, T., 2006. "Classification and salt tolerance analysis of barley varieties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 184-192, September.
    3. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J.W. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M. & Oweis, T., 2005. "Salt tolerance analysis of chickpea, faba bean and durum wheat varieties: I. Chickpea and faba bean," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 177-194, April.
    4. Katerji, N. & van Hoorn, J. W. & Hamdy, A. & Mastrorilli, M., 2003. "Salinity effect on crop development and yield, analysis of salt tolerance according to several classification methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 37-66, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:52:y:2006:i:8:id:3454-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.