IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v70y2024i2id107-2023-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of growth, structure and production in stands of naturally regenerated Betula pendula and Populus tremula

Author

Listed:
  • Antonín Martiník

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeňek Adamec

    (Department of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Matúš Sendecký

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Krejza

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
    Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In Central Europe, the most important pioneer species are silver birch and European aspen. Changes in disturbance regime and an economic interest for this species have led to studies on this species and stands. Two naturally regenerated dense stands of birch (Betula pendula Roth - silver birch monoculture) and aspen (Populus tremula L. - European aspen monoculture) were selected from a Querceto - Fagetum mesotrophicum site to observe responses under the same conditions in Central Europe. Both stands regenerated after the allochthonous Norway spruce stands dieback at the site in 1999. Within a 10 m × 25 m transect established in both stands, the diameter at breast height (DBH) of all the trees was measured between 2015 and 2020. In addition, the height and position were recorded for all trees, and sample trees of both species were felled for biomass measurement. A higher volume production of aspen at the beginning (107.48/96.80 m3) and at the end of the experiment (178.32/143.08 m3) was accompanied with a lower above-ground wood biomass (WAB). The WAB of birch increased from 81.9 t.ha-1 to 103.3 t.ha-1 and aspen allocated 79.5 t.ha-1 to 94.8 t.ha-1 of biomass. The current annual increment of biomass for these stands was 4.3 t.ha-1 and 3.1 t.ha-1 in the age range of 17 to 22 years. The culmination of the volume increment has not yet occurred in any of the stands, but the mean annual increment of wood biomass has already been reached for both stands. Furthermore, the aspen stand tended to be more dynamic in terms of biomass allocation and mortality. Also, the lower self-tolerance of aspen confirmed our hypothesis: the two native pioneer species differ in their social behaviour within monospecific stands.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonín Martiník & Zdeňek Adamec & Matúš Sendecký & Jan Krejza, 2024. "Comparison of growth, structure and production in stands of naturally regenerated Betula pendula and Populus tremula," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 64-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:70:y:2024:i:2:id:107-2023-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/107/2023-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/107/2023-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/107/2023-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/107/2023-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Viewegh & A. Kusbach & M. Mikeska, 2003. "Czech forest ecosystem classification," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(2), pages 74-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Żelazny, 2014. "Changes of forest abiotic environment in the Western Carpathians assessed using phytoindication," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(4), pages 133-142.
    2. Ondřej SCHÖNFELDER & Aleš ZEIDLER & Vlastimil BORŮVKA & Lukáš BÍLEK, 2017. "Influence of site conditions and silvicultural practice on the wood density of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) - a case study from the Doksy locality, Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(10), pages 457-462.
    3. Tomáš Čihák & Monika Vejpustková, 2023. "Comparison of nutrient and carbon stocks in the aboveground biomass of mature silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 334-347.
    4. Václav Šimůnek & Vojtěch Hájek & Anna Prokůpková & Josef Gallo, 2021. "Finding an imprint of solar and climatic cycles in tree rings of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(9), pages 409-419.
    5. J. Novák & D. Dušek & M. Slodičák, 2014. "Quantity and quality of litterfall in young oak stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 219-225.
    6. K. Matějka, 2009. "Assessment of tree layer biomass and structure using aerial photos in lake catchments of the Šumava Mts," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 63-74.
    7. L. Bílek & S. Vacek & Z. Vacek & J. Remeš & J. Král & D. Bulušek & J. Gallo, 2016. "How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(1), pages 24-34.
    8. E. Kula & A. Pešlová & P. Martinek, 2012. "Effects of nitrogen on growth properties and phenology of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(9), pages 391-399.
    9. O. Špulák, 2012. "Aboveground biomass and nutrients in an 18-years-old stand of blue spruce (Picea pungens Engelm.) as a substitute tree species," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(6), pages 253-264.
    10. Monika Vejpustková & Tomáš Čihák & Petr Fišer, 2023. "The increasing drought sensitivity of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) is evident in the last two decades," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(2), pages 67-79.
    11. K. Matějka & J. Leugner & V. Krpeš, 2014. "Phenotype features in juvenile populations of Picea abies and their growth," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(3), pages 96-108.
    12. Pavel Samec & Aleš Kučera & Pavel Tuček, 2014. "Fluctuations in the properties of forest soils in the Central European highlands (Czech Republic)," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 201-213.
    13. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:107-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    14. P. Šamonil & K. Polesná & P. Unar, 2009. "Plant community variability within potential natural vegetation units: a case study from the Bohemian Karst," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(11), pages 485-501.
    15. O. Švec & L. Bílek & J. Remeš & Z. Vacek, 2015. "Analysis of operational approach during forest transformation in Klokočná Range, Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 148-155.
    16. J. Möllerová & J. Viewegh, 2005. "Vegetation of the Nature Reserve Voskop (Protected Landscape Area Český kras) and possible trends of its development," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(SpecialIs), pages 24-26.
    17. P. Šamonil, 2007. "Uniqueness of limestone soil-forming substrate in the forest ecosystem classification," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 149-161.
    18. S. Střeštík & P. Šamonil, 2006. "Ecological valence of expanding European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(7), pages 293-305.
    19. O. Špulák & D. Kacálek, 2016. "Below-canopy and topsoil temperatures in young Norway spruce and Carpathian birch stands compared to gaps in the mountains," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(10), pages 441-451.
    20. K. Malík & J. Remeš & S. Vacek & V. Štícha, 2014. "Development and dynamics of mountain spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karsten) stand regeneration," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(2), pages 61-69.
    21. Pavel Brabec & Jakub Brichta & Zdeněk Vacek & Stanislav Vacek & Václav Šimůnek & Vojtěch Hájek, 2023. "Potential of mixed Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus sylvestris L. forests in lowland areas of Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(11), pages 470-484.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:70:y:2024:i:2:id:107-2023-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.