IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v63y2017i12id131-2017-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowns of "forgotten" standards in hardwood floodplain forests

Author

Listed:
  • Lubomír ŠÁLEK

    (Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Ivo MACHAR

    (Department of Development and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Ahmet SIVACIOGLU

    (Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Forestry, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey)

  • Daniel ZAHRADNÍK

    (Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jaroslav SIMON

    (Department of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Lucie JEŘÁBKOVÁ

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, London, UK)

Abstract

Floodplain forests have traditionally been managed using the coppice-with-standards silvicultural system for centuries. After abandoning this silvicultural system approximately in the 1950s the crown of standards (mature-aged trees) developed gradually under the growing influence of their tree competitors. This study examines the crowns of remnant oak and ash standards in a hardwood floodplain forest along the Morava River in the Czech Republic. 100 oak (Quercus robur Linnaeus) standards and 100 ash (Fraxinus excelsior Linnaeus) standards were randomly selected and the basic mensuration data as well as some ecological data, such as number of large dead branches, cavities, and height of the lowest large dead and green branches, were measured. The four nearest neighbour competitors were identified for each standard, and their height, distance and azimuth were measured. The DBH of the analysed oak standards ranged between 71 and 148 cm, and the projected oak crown area ranged between 125 and 533 m2. The ash DBH ranged between 71 and 127 cm, and projected ash crowns between 194 and 620 m2. To assess competitive pressure, we calculated an index as a ratio of the tangents of angles of regular and compressed crowns. Distance of competing trees was more important than their height in the ash data set, but not in the oak data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Lubomír ŠÁLEK & Ivo MACHAR & Ahmet SIVACIOGLU & Daniel ZAHRADNÍK & Jaroslav SIMON & Lucie JEŘÁBKOVÁ, 2017. "Crowns of "forgotten" standards in hardwood floodplain forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 538-548.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:63:y:2017:i:12:id:131-2017-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/131/2017-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/131/2017-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/131/2017-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/131/2017-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Viewegh & A. Kusbach & M. Mikeska, 2003. "Czech forest ecosystem classification," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(2), pages 74-82.
    2. L. Dobrovolný & V. Tesař, 2010. "Growth and characteristics of old beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees individually dispersed in spruce monocultures--," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(9), pages 406-416.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Żelazny, 2014. "Changes of forest abiotic environment in the Western Carpathians assessed using phytoindication," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(4), pages 133-142.
    2. Antonín Martiník & Zdeňek Adamec & Matúš Sendecký & Jan Krejza, 2024. "Comparison of growth, structure and production in stands of naturally regenerated Betula pendula and Populus tremula," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 64-78.
    3. Ondřej SCHÖNFELDER & Aleš ZEIDLER & Vlastimil BORŮVKA & Lukáš BÍLEK, 2017. "Influence of site conditions and silvicultural practice on the wood density of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) - a case study from the Doksy locality, Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(10), pages 457-462.
    4. Tomáš Čihák & Monika Vejpustková, 2023. "Comparison of nutrient and carbon stocks in the aboveground biomass of mature silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 334-347.
    5. Václav Šimůnek & Vojtěch Hájek & Anna Prokůpková & Josef Gallo, 2021. "Finding an imprint of solar and climatic cycles in tree rings of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(9), pages 409-419.
    6. J. Novák & D. Dušek & M. Slodičák, 2014. "Quantity and quality of litterfall in young oak stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 219-225.
    7. K. Matějka, 2009. "Assessment of tree layer biomass and structure using aerial photos in lake catchments of the Šumava Mts," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 63-74.
    8. L. Bílek & S. Vacek & Z. Vacek & J. Remeš & J. Král & D. Bulušek & J. Gallo, 2016. "How close to nature is close-to-nature pine silviculture?," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(1), pages 24-34.
    9. E. Kula & A. Pešlová & P. Martinek, 2012. "Effects of nitrogen on growth properties and phenology of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(9), pages 391-399.
    10. O. Špulák, 2012. "Aboveground biomass and nutrients in an 18-years-old stand of blue spruce (Picea pungens Engelm.) as a substitute tree species," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(6), pages 253-264.
    11. Monika Vejpustková & Tomáš Čihák & Petr Fišer, 2023. "The increasing drought sensitivity of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) is evident in the last two decades," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(2), pages 67-79.
    12. K. Matějka & J. Leugner & V. Krpeš, 2014. "Phenotype features in juvenile populations of Picea abies and their growth," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(3), pages 96-108.
    13. Pavel Samec & Aleš Kučera & Pavel Tuček, 2014. "Fluctuations in the properties of forest soils in the Central European highlands (Czech Republic)," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 201-213.
    14. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:107-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    15. P. Šamonil & K. Polesná & P. Unar, 2009. "Plant community variability within potential natural vegetation units: a case study from the Bohemian Karst," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(11), pages 485-501.
    16. O. Švec & L. Bílek & J. Remeš & Z. Vacek, 2015. "Analysis of operational approach during forest transformation in Klokočná Range, Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 148-155.
    17. J. Möllerová & J. Viewegh, 2005. "Vegetation of the Nature Reserve Voskop (Protected Landscape Area Český kras) and possible trends of its development," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(SpecialIs), pages 24-26.
    18. P. Šamonil, 2007. "Uniqueness of limestone soil-forming substrate in the forest ecosystem classification," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 149-161.
    19. S. Střeštík & P. Šamonil, 2006. "Ecological valence of expanding European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(7), pages 293-305.
    20. O. Špulák & D. Kacálek, 2016. "Below-canopy and topsoil temperatures in young Norway spruce and Carpathian birch stands compared to gaps in the mountains," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(10), pages 441-451.
    21. K. Malík & J. Remeš & S. Vacek & V. Štícha, 2014. "Development and dynamics of mountain spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karsten) stand regeneration," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(2), pages 61-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:63:y:2017:i:12:id:131-2017-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.