IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v69y2023i9id55-2023-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of bioengineering treatments on reduction of soil erosion from road cut slope and fill slope

Author

Listed:
  • Aidin Parsakhoo

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran)

  • Seyed Ataollah Hosseini

    (Forestry and Forest Economics Department, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran)

Abstract

The efficiency of different conservation practices on soil loss from road side slopes is scarcely identified in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran, which could retard the implementation of these management practices. Sediment of 48 plots on the cut slopes and fill slopes of forest roads were collected to explore their responses to soil conservation practices, including straw bale (SB), living hedge (LH), dead hedge (DH), geo-cell (GC), geotextile (GT), and bare soil (BS). Moreover, the efficiency of conservation practices was evaluated to find a cost-effective approach. Sediment traps were installed at the toe of side slopes in the ditch and end of each treated plot. Sediment volume was measured monthly for six months. The results demonstrated that the lowest soil loss occurred in autumn and fill slopes treated with GC (5.05 g.m-2) and the highest in winter and cut slopes treated with SB (41.81 g.m-2). In all cases, soil loss from BS (126.74 g.m-2) was significantly higher than in plots treated with conservation practices. GC performed well under certain circumstances due to two-dimensional protections of contiguous wooden lumbers. Moreover, it was found that in a short time there were not any significant differences between LH (28.78 g.m-2), DH (36.01 g.m-2), and GT (30.61 g.m-2) in soil loss control ability. Regarding implementation and installation costs, GC (USD 16.67 per plot) was the most expensive, while LH (USD 3.33 per plot) was the cheapest. Regarding GC, it is necessary to conduct long-term research to determine economic efficiency, durability, maintenance, and repair costs. Until then, it is possible to use affordable treatments such as LH, which have yielded favourable results in efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Aidin Parsakhoo & Seyed Ataollah Hosseini, 2023. "Effect of bioengineering treatments on reduction of soil erosion from road cut slope and fill slope," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(9), pages 367-376.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:69:y:2023:i:9:id:55-2023-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/55/2023-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/55/2023-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/55/2023-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/55/2023-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoan Chen & Ziwei Liang & Zhanyu Zhang & Long Zhang, 2020. "Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Red Soil Slope Farmland under Natural Rainfall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Madhu Sudan Acharya, 2020. "Bamboo Crib Wall: A Sustainable Soil Bioengineering Method to Stabilize Slopes in Nepal," Journal of Development Innovations, KarmaQuest International, vol. 4(1), pages 99-118, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Luo & Lin Zhen & Yunfeng Hu, 2020. "The Effects of Restoration Practices on a Small Watershed in China’s Loess Plateau: A Case Study of the Qiaozigou Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Li, Hongying & Zhu, Ningyuan & Qiao, Jun & Tang, Jun, 2024. "Evaluating the long-term effects of best management practices on pollution reduction and soil quality improvement in sloping farmland of the Three Gorges Reservoir area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    3. Gaofeng Song & Xiaoruan Song & Shiqin He & Dezhong Kong & Shuai Zhang, 2022. "Soil Reinforcement with Geocells and Vegetation for Ecological Mitigation of Shallow Slope Failure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Hao Li & Wenjing Zhao & Jing Wang & Xiaozhe Geng & Chunyu Song, 2024. "Evaluating the Accuracy of Contour Ridgeline Positioning for Soil Conservation in the Northeast Black Soil Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Huang, Chunbo & Zhao, Dengyue & Liao, Qipeng & Xiao, Mingzhu, 2023. "Linking landscape dynamics to the relationship between water purification and soil retention," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Fathia Jarray & Taoufik Hermassi & Mohamed Mechergui & Claudio Zucca & Quang Bao Le, 2023. "Long-Term Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil Erosion in a Tunisian Semi-Arid Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Wang, Jilei & Shi, Xiangxue & Li, Zizhong & Zhang, Yan & Liu, Yanqing & Peng, Yuxing, 2021. "Responses of runoff and soil erosion to planting pattern, row direction, and straw mulching on sloped farmland in the corn belt of northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:69:y:2023:i:9:id:55-2023-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.