IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11911-d921154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Reinforcement with Geocells and Vegetation for Ecological Mitigation of Shallow Slope Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Gaofeng Song

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China)

  • Xiaoruan Song

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China)

  • Shiqin He

    (School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China)

  • Dezhong Kong

    (Mining College, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Shuai Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Soil reinforcement using geocells and vegetation is one of the best forms of soil protection for shallow slope failure control. The geocell supports the vegetation growth and the vegetation cover provides protection against the surface erosion. This work proposed a soil treatment method using geocells for supporting the vegetation growth and stabilizing the shallow slope. A step-by-step installation of the geocells in the field and the development of vegetation growth were also described. The authors developed nine physical models that were reinforced with different sized geocell structures (no reinforcement and small and large geocell reinforcement). The models were placed under three rainfall intensities (50, 75, and 100 mm/h). The stability of the slope under the rainfall and the performance of the geocell reinforcement were assessed from the the development of slope failures, the soil erosion and the slope displacement. The results showed that the stability of geocell reinforced slopes were better off than the unsupported slope. The small geocell-reinforced slopes showed less measured soil erosion and also smaller slope displacement. In general, small geocells outperformed large geocells in terms of the erosion control and slope stabilization. The rainfall intensity dramatically increased the soil erosion on slopes. The geocell- and vegetation-treated slope in the field showed good resistance against the surface erosion.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaofeng Song & Xiaoruan Song & Shiqin He & Dezhong Kong & Shuai Zhang, 2022. "Soil Reinforcement with Geocells and Vegetation for Ecological Mitigation of Shallow Slope Failure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11911-:d:921154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhu Sudan Acharya, 2020. "Bamboo Crib Wall: A Sustainable Soil Bioengineering Method to Stabilize Slopes in Nepal," Journal of Development Innovations, KarmaQuest International, vol. 4(1), pages 99-118, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng Zuo & Xiuqiang Hao & Huiqiang Li & Wei Wang & Guangqing Yang & Ying Liu, 2023. "Effect of the Slit on the Mechanical Tearing Behavior of High-Density Polyethylene and Polyester Geocell Strips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Zheng Zuo & Xiuqiang Hao & Huiqiang Li & Wei Wang & Guangqing Yang & Ying Liu, 2023. "Experimental Investigations on the Tensile Mechanical Behavior of HDPE Geocell Strip," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aidin Parsakhoo & Seyed Ataollah Hosseini, 2023. "Effect of bioengineering treatments on reduction of soil erosion from road cut slope and fill slope," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(9), pages 367-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11911-:d:921154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.