IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v65y2019i5id202-2018-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative approaches to management with emphasis on soft factors and their impact on the efficiency of agribusiness companies

Author

Listed:
  • Nadežda Jankelová
  • Katarína Remeňová

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

  • Zuzana Skorková

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

  • Ildikó Némethová

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

This paper represents a wider research aimed at the examination of innovative approaches to management and their impact on the competitiveness and success of companies in a globalised world economy. Its main objective is to evaluate perceived importance of these approaches with emphasis on soft factors in agribusiness companies in Slovakia in terms of methods and tools used in the implementation of individual management functions, as well as in terms of the frequency of their applications, and their impact on the efficiency of these companies. However, a research gap has been identified in the existing literature on primary agribusiness companies. To improve their position, farmers should not only passively respond to many external factors that are of course important in this sector but should also be proactive and innovative in their management methods and practices. A questionnaire research has been conducted in agribusiness companies in Slovakia. The obtained results highlight the significance of hard factors in the utilisation of management tools. Moreover, soft factors have positively affected economic results. Innovativeness has been identified in leadership functions, where a significant link has been found between the transformation style of leadership and the importance of soft factors in transformational management.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadežda Jankelová & Katarína Remeňová & Zuzana Skorková & Ildikó Némethová, 2019. "Innovative approaches to management with emphasis on soft factors and their impact on the efficiency of agribusiness companies," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(5), pages 203-211.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:65:y:2019:i:5:id:202-2018-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/202/2018-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/202/2018-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/202/2018-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/202/2018-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadezda JANKELOVA & Dusan MASAR & Stefania MORICOVA, 2017. "Risk factors in the agriculture sector," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(6), pages 247-258.
    2. Zeng, Jing & Zhang, Wenqing & Matsui, Yoshiki & Zhao, Xiande, 2017. "The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 240-251.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    2. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Ehsan Namdar Joyami & Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi & Seyed AliGholi Rowshan, 2024. "Quality Management and Environmental Management: Role of Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Innovation in Knowledge-Based Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8457-8494, June.
    4. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada, 2018. "The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Mirela Cristea & Gratiela Georgiana Noja, 2019. "European agriculture under immigration effects: New empirical evidence," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(3), pages 112-122.
    6. Eduardo Duque‐Grisales & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero‐Villegas & Encarnación García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3286-3302, December.
    7. Gomes, Paulo J. & Silva, Graça Miranda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Exploring the relationship between quality ambidexterity and sustainable production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2023. "The relationships between soft and hard factors of the Toyota way: a socio-technical perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 768-779, June.
    9. Kumari, Vineeta & Hassan, Majdi & Pandey, Dharen Kumar, 2024. "Are high-income and innovative nations resilient to the Russia-Ukraine war?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1268-1287.
    10. Fundin, Anders & Bergquist, Bjarne & Eriksson, Henrik & Gremyr, Ida, 2018. "Challenges and propositions for research in quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 125-137.
    11. Muhammad Khuram Khalil & Umaporn Muneenam, 2021. "Total Quality Management Practices and Corporate Green Performance: Does Organizational Culture Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz, 2021. "Incremental and radical product innovation capabilities in a quality management context: Exploring the moderating effects of control mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Ma, Li & Zhai, Xin & Zhong, Weiguo & Zhang, Zhi-Xue, 2019. "Deploying human capital for innovation: A study of multi-country manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 241-253.
    14. Kashif Ali & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Amgad Muneer & Ayed Alwadain & Rao Faizan Ali, 2022. "Soft and Hard Total Quality Management Practices Promote Industry 4.0 Readiness: A SEM-Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    15. de Moraes, Celso Francisco & Silva, Messias Borges, 2018. "Framework for conformity assessment based on an analogy with the Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Mechanics (FCAUP)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 394-403.
    16. Ladinig, Thomas B. & Vastag, Gyula, 2021. "Mapping quality linkages based on tacit knowledge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    17. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert & Sudawan Somjai & Sriparinya Toopgajank, 2020. "Factors Affecting Firm s Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting, Green Innovation and Environmental Proactivity," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 325-331.
    18. Murrja Arif & Ndreca Pjetër & Maloku Sadik & Meço Maksim, 2023. "Analysis of Production Risk in Intensive Chicken Farms – The Case of Kosovo," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 294-310, December.
    19. Zengjian Huang & Amna Shahzadi & Yaser Daanial Khan, 2022. "Unfolding the Impact of Quality 4.0 Practices on Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy Practices: A Hybrid SEM-ANN Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Benny Lianto, 2023. "Identifying Key Assessment Factors for a Company’s Innovation Capability Based on Intellectual Capital: An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:65:y:2019:i:5:id:202-2018-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.