IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/but/ijebfa/v8y2018i1p145-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Main Directions of Development in the Defence Industry Sector in the Aspect of Globalization

Author

Listed:
  • ?ukasz Maculewicz

    (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland)

Abstract

The defence industry is one of the demanding elements of the economy. The European defence market brings together many entities operating in various economic forms. Each of these entities operates under conditions of strong competition requiring large capital expenditures. The main directions observed is the integration of member states in the field of security and defence and the concentration of defence industry, which main objective is to strengthen the European industrial and technological base, international approach to program implementation research and production, and above all, avoiding the multiplication of identical research programs and technological competence as well as seeking opportunities to reduce production costs. Due to the high costs of developing new military technologies, the vanishing of the defense sector's territorial division and the merging of US, European and others of the world cannot is highly probable. At the beginning, probably in individual projects, as technology develops, consolidation can be permanent.

Suggested Citation

  • ?ukasz Maculewicz, 2018. "Main Directions of Development in the Defence Industry Sector in the Aspect of Globalization," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 8(1), pages 145-155.
    • Handle: RePEc:but:ijebfa:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:145-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ijeb.faa.ro/download/542_10%20(18-27)%20C%20-%20Maculewicz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://ijeb.faa.ro/en/article/Main-Directions-of-Development-in-the-Defence-Industry-Sector-in-the-Aspect-of-Globalization~542.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Working Group on Human Rights (WGHR), 2018. "Militarisation and Armed Conflict," Working Papers id:12532, eSocialSciences.
    2. Keith Hartley, 2003. "The future of European defence policy: An economic perspective," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 107-115.
    3. Tom Le, 2018. "Japan and the Revolution in Military Affairs," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 5(2), pages 172-196, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pieroni, Luca & d'Agostino, Giorgio & Lorusso, Marco, 2008. "Can we declare military Keynesianism dead?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 675-691.
    2. João Carlos Gonçalves dos Reis, 2021. "Politics, Power, and Influence: Defense Industries in the Post-Cold War," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Christos Kollias & Nikolaos Mylonidis & Suzanna-Maria Paleologou, 2007. "A Panel Data Analysis Of The Nexus Between Defence Spending And Growth In The European Union," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 75-85.
    4. Kollias, Christos & Manolas, George & Paleologou, Suzanna-Maria, 2004. "Defence expenditure and economic growth in the European Union: A causality analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 553-569, July.
    5. Jean Belin & Marianne Guille, 2008. "Defence and firm financial structure in France," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 46-61.
    6. Damien Besancenot & Radu Vranceanu, 2006. "European Defence Firms: The Information Barrier On Private Finance," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-36.
    7. Raaj Kishore Biswas & Enamul Kabir & Refat Bin Reza Rafi, 2019. "Investment in Research and Development Compared to Military Expenditure: Is Research Worthwhile?," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 846-857, November.
    8. Emmanouil Economou & Nicholas Kyriazis & Theodore Metaxas, 2015. "The institutional and economic foundations of regional proto-federations," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 251-271, August.
    9. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2005. "Le financement public du secteur de la défense, une source d'inefficacité," ESSEC Working Papers DR 05008, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    10. Mert Topcu & Ilhan Aras, 2015. "Defense spending and economic growth: Extended empirical analysis for the European Union," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 233-246, April.
    11. Michail Ploumis, 2017. "Hellenic Defence Industrial Base in the Era of Economic Crisis," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 15(2), pages 103-125.
    12. Christos Kollias & Suzanna‐Maria Paleologou, 2010. "Growth, investment and military expenditure in the European Union‐15," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 228-240, May.
    13. Jean Belin & Marianne Guille, 2008. "R&D et innovation en France : quel financement pour les entreprises de la Défense ?," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 33-59.
    14. Emmanouil M. L. Economou & Nicholas C. Kyriazis, 2016. "The Achaeans and the Europeans: An Interdisciplinary Comparison of Federations," International Journal of Social Science Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 8-23, September.
    15. ., 2014. "A company case study. BAE Systems: achievements, rivals and prospects," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Aerospace Industries, chapter 8, pages 141-161, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:but:ijebfa:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:145-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faaubro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.