IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/journl/v35y2017i1p342-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eu Cohesion Policy In Central And Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ovidiu Puiu

    (Constantin Brancoveanu University, Pitesti, Romania)

  • Cristina Serbanica

    (Constantin Brancoveanu University, Pitesti, Romania)

  • Alina Voiculet

    (Constantin Brancoveanu University, Pitesti, Romania)

  • Sebastian Ene

    (Constantin Brancoveanu University, Pitesti, Romania)

  • Cristina Ganescu

    (Constantin Brancoveanu University, Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to shed light on the spending patterns and impacts of the EU Funds (2007 – 2013) in Central and Eastern European countries which are also EU Member States: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. With more than half of the total allocations from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Cohesion Fund (CF) and European Social Fund (ESF) going the CEE the countries, the region has made important progresses in supporting development investments throughout the crisis period, but there is much room for improvement in terms of efficiency in the years to come. By far, the most important allocations went to Environment and Transport, for which almost all of the countries spent about a half of their total allocations. The most striking differences in CEE countries spending patterns are those related to the allocations for Research, Development and Innovation (RTD) and Culture and social infrastructure. Policy implications in terms of impacts on economic development and the key lessons for the future are discussed in the final part of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Ovidiu Puiu & Cristina Serbanica & Alina Voiculet & Sebastian Ene & Cristina Ganescu, 2017. "Eu Cohesion Policy In Central And Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 35(1), pages 342-354.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:342-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/170145.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leon Podkaminer, 2013. "Development Patterns of Central and East European Countries (in the course of transition and following EU accession)," wiiw Research Reports 388, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    2. Martin Ferry & Irene McMaster, 2013. "Cohesion Policy and the Evolution of Regional Policy in Central and Eastern Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1502-1528, October.
    3. Beata Farkas, 2011. "The Central and Eastern European model of capitalism," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 15-34.
    4. Janos Varga & Jan in't Veld, 2011. "Cohesion Policy Spending in the New Member States of the EU in an Endogenous Growth Model," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 29-54, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grande, Rafael & Muñoz de Bustillo, Rafael & Fernández Macías, Enrique & Antón, José Ignacio, 2020. "Innovation and job quality. A firm-level exploration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 130-142.
    2. Karbowski, Adam, 2019. "Analiza otoczenia instytucjonalnego systemu tworzenia wiedzy w krajach Europy Środkowej [Analysis of the institutional environment of the knowledge subsystem in Central Europe]," MPRA Paper 95570, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    3. Farkas Beáta, 2018. "What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(4), pages 283-290, December.
    4. Sandra Misiak-Kwit & Katarzyna Wlodarczyk & Ewa Mazur-Wierzbicka & Lukas Smerek & Jozef Durian, 2023. "The Human Resources Management System in Slovakia and Poland – Chosen Aspects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 20-39.
    5. Nordlund, Carl, 2023. "Transformations, trajectories and similarities of national production structures: a comparative fingerprinting approach," SocArXiv 6byxh, Center for Open Science.
    6. Helena Tendera-Właszczuk & Michał Szymański, 2017. "Distinct and yet not Separate: Revisiting the Welfare Models in the EU New Member States," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(1), pages 131-149.
    7. Rumen Dobrinsky & Peter Havlik, 2014. "Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession," wiiw Research Reports 395, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    8. Mihaela (Dan) PREJMEREAN, 2012. "The Necessity of Clusters for Modern Management," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(5), pages 778-792, December.
    9. Francesco Forte & Mihai Mutascu, 2015. "State fragility and fiscal decentralization in EU ex-communist countries in a public choice approach," Working Papers halshs-01101558, HAL.
    10. Gheorghe Savoiu & Marian Siminica, 2016. "Disparities, Discrepancies and Specific Concentration – Diversification Trends in the Group of Central and East European Ex-Socialist Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(43), pages 503-503, August.
    11. Markus Ahlborn & Joachim Ahrens & Rainer Schweickert, 2016. "Large-Scale Transition of Economic Systems – Do CEECs Converge Toward Western Prototypes?," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(3), pages 430-454, September.
    12. Imre Lengyel & János Rechnitzer, 2013. "Drivers of Regional Competitiveness in the Central European Countries," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(3), pages 421-435, November.
    13. Mojca Svetek, 2023. "The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Perceived Competence and Cooperativeness in Early-Stage Financing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2047-2076, November.
    14. Benczes, István & Rezessy, Gergely, 2013. "Governance in Europe, Trends and Fault Lines," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 58(2), pages 133-147.
    15. Ivanov Laurentiu, 2016. "The Industrial Development In Poland And Romania In The Last 100 Years. Theory Of Path Dependency," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 160-169, April.
    16. Mihaela-Cornelia (DAN) PREJMEREAN, 2012. "The Contribution Of Higher Education Institutions In Regional Development," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2012(8), pages 142-149, June.
    17. Fratesi, Ugo & Perucca, Giovanni, 2014. "Territorial Capital and the Effectiveness of Cohesion Policies: an Assessment for CEE Regions," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 29, pages 165-191.
    18. Mura Petru-Ovidiu, 2015. "Tax Composition And Economic Growth. A Panel-Model Approach For Eastern Europe," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 89-101, February.
    19. Schulz Sebastian, 2019. "Ambitious or Ambiguous? The Implications of Smart Specialisation for Core-Periphery Relations in Estonia and Slovakia," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 49-71, December.
    20. Edit Lippai-Makra & Zsolt Rádóczi & Zsuzsanna Ilona Kovács, 2019. "Intellectual capital disclosure of Hungarian and Czech Listed firms," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(3), pages 43-59.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CEE countries; regional development; European Cohesion Policy; spending patterns; policy evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • R5 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:342-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan MICUDA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.