IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p104-d1554238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Structure of Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe in the Light of the European Green Deal

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila Radlińska

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Koszalin Univeristy of Technology, Śniadeckich 2, 75-453 Koszalin, Poland)

Abstract

The economic transformation following the collapse of the Eastern Bloc and the accession of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries to the European Union (EU) are milestones that have set the current course for their agricultural sectors. With their accession to the EU, the CEE countries obliged, among other things, to adapt their agricultural activities to the requirements of the common organization of agricultural market and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). In 2004, the agricultural sectors of Central and Eastern European countries (the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland and Slovakia), and in 2007, the agricultural sectors of Bulgaria and Romania, were significantly different from those of the EU countries. After almost two decades in EU structures and in the face of climate challenges, it is interesting to discuss the assessment of changes that have taken place in the agricultural sectors of CEE countries and their future. Based on FADN data, the structure of agricultural sectors in Central and Eastern Europe and selected EU countries for 2004–2021 was estimated in terms of types of farming and economic size classes. The agricultural sectors of CEE countries have become similar to those of EU countries in terms of agricultural production structure, and in 2021 will be characterized by a higher level of production specialization than when they accessed the EU. There was also an increase in the economic size of their production, but it was still significantly lower compared to the economic size of farms in EU countries. In light of the goals of the European Green Deal (EGD), this observation may be useful for moving into the next stage of development of the agricultural sector in Central and Eastern Europe. Indeed, achieving the EGD’s goals will require setting adopted development directions, i.e., formulating agricultural practices that facilitate the transition to more sustainable agriculture, such as practices based on the concept of sustainable intensification or ecological intensification.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila Radlińska, 2024. "Changes in the Structure of Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe in the Light of the European Green Deal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:104-:d:1554238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio A. Madau & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina, 2017. "Technical efficiency and total factor productivity changes in European dairy farm sectors," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Agnieszka Baer-Nawrocka, 2021. "Regional Differences in Benefits from the EU Common Agricultural Policy in Poland and Their Policy Implications," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Mark Leonard & Jeremy Shapiro & Jean Pisani-Ferry & Simone Tagliapietra & Guntram B. Wolff, 2021. "The geopolitics of the European Green Deal," Bruegel Policy Contributions 40941, Bruegel.
    4. Leon Podkaminer, 2013. "Development Patterns of Central and East European Countries (in the course of transition and following EU accession)," wiiw Research Reports 388, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    5. Radu Lucian Pânzaru & Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Andi Ciobanu & Dragoș Mihai Medelete & Ramona Pîrvu, 2023. "Organic Agriculture in the Context of 2030 Agenda Implementation in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Lukáš Čechura & Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová & Michaela Lekešová, 2022. "Productivity and efficiency in Czech agriculture: Does farm size matter?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(1), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Piotr Bartkowiak, 2022. "Various Facets of Sustainable Smart City Management: Selected Examples from Polish Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Nordlund, Carl, 2023. "Transformations, trajectories and similarities of national production structures: a comparative fingerprinting approach," SocArXiv 6byxh, Center for Open Science.
    4. Tohidi, Amirhossein & Ghorbani, Mohammad & Karbasi, Ali-Reza & Asgharpourmasouleh, Ahmadreza & Hassani-Mahmooei, Behrooz, 2020. "Comparison of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Rank Business Strategies and Marketing Resources," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(3), September.
    5. Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Panos M. Pardalos, 2023. "A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-38, March.
    6. Exenberger, Emil & Bucko, Jozef, 2020. "Analysis of Online Consumer Behavior - Design of CRISP-DM Process Model," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(3), September.
    7. Jarmila Lazíková & Zuzana Lazíková & Ivan Takáč & Ľubica Rumanovská & Anna Bandlerová, 2019. "Technical Efficiency in the Agricultural Business—The Case of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Alexandra Sintori & Penelope Gouta & Vasilia Konstantidelli & Irene Tzouramani, 2024. "Eco-Efficiency of Olive Farms across Diversified Ecological Farming Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Rumen Dobrinsky & Peter Havlik, 2014. "Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession," wiiw Research Reports 395, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    10. Stefan Krajewski & Jan Žukovskis & Dariusz Gozdowski & Marek Cieśliński & Elżbieta Wójcik-Gront, 2024. "Evaluating the Path to the European Commission’s Organic Agriculture Goal: A Multivariate Analysis of Changes in EU Countries (2004–2021) and Socio-Economic Relationships," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Gheorghe Savoiu & Marian Siminica, 2016. "Disparities, Discrepancies and Specific Concentration – Diversification Trends in the Group of Central and East European Ex-Socialist Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(43), pages 503-503, August.
    12. Ibe, Rebecca & Rahji, Mohammed & Adeoti, Adetola & Adenegan, Kemisola, 2020. "Household Demand for Fruits and Vegetables in Rural and Urban South-Western Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(3), September.
    13. Andrew P. Barnes, 2023. "The role of family life‐cycle events on persistent and transient inefficiencies in less favoured areas," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 295-315, February.
    14. Gökçe Koç & Ayşe Uzmay, 2024. "Construction of a Farm-Level Food Security Index: Case Study of Turkish Dairy Farms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 687-714, November.
    15. Fertő, Imre & Bakucs, Zoltán & Viira, Ants-Hannes & Aleksandrova, Olha & Luik-Lindsaar, Helis & Omel, Raul, 2024. "Are Organic Farms Less Efficient? The Case of Estonian Dairy Farms," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 16(4), March.
    16. Ivanov Laurentiu, 2016. "The Industrial Development In Poland And Romania In The Last 100 Years. Theory Of Path Dependency," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 160-169, April.
    17. Arman Poureisa & Yuhanis Abdul Aziz & Siew-Imm Ng, 2024. "Swipe to Sustain: Exploring Consumer Behaviors in Organic Food Purchasing via Instagram Social Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Adamides, George, 2020. "Heuristic Evaluation of the User Interface for a Semi-Autonomous Agricultural Robot Sprayer," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(3), September.
    19. Simola, Heli & Solanko, Laura, 2021. "Russia's oil & gas sector in global energy transition," BOFIT Policy Briefs 7/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    20. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & T. C. E. Cheng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Models of High Carbon Supply Chains under the Mixed Carbon Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Tax Policy in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:104-:d:1554238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.