IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v16y2017i4p275-289n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A statistical test for detecting parent-of-origin effects when parental information is missing

Author

Listed:
  • Sacco Chiara

    (Department of Statistical Sciences “Paolo Fortunati”, University of Bologna, Via delle Belle Arti 41, Bologna 40126, Italy)

  • Viroli Cinzia

    (Department of Statistical Sciences “Paolo Fortunati”, University of Bologna, Via delle Belle Arti 41, Bologna 40126, Italy)

  • Falchi Mario

    (Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, 3rd Floor, South Wing St Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, London SE1 7EH, UK)

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that leads to differential contributions of maternal and paternal alleles to offspring gene expression in a parent-of-origin manner. We propose a novel test for detecting the parent-of-origin effects (POEs) in genome wide genotype data from related individuals (twins) when the parental origin cannot be inferred. The proposed method exploits a finite mixture of linear mixed models: the key idea is that in the case of POEs the population can be clustered in two different groups in which the reference allele is inherited by a different parent. A further advantage of this approach is the possibility to obtain an estimation of parental effect when the parental information is missing. We will also show that the approach is flexible enough to be applicable to the general scenario of independent data. The performance of the proposed test is evaluated through a wide simulation study. The method is finally applied to known imprinted genes of the MuTHER twin study data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sacco Chiara & Viroli Cinzia & Falchi Mario, 2017. "A statistical test for detecting parent-of-origin effects when parental information is missing," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 275-289, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:16:y:2017:i:4:p:275-289:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2017-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2017-0007
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sagmb-2017-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Stephens, 2000. "Dealing with label switching in mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 795-809.
    2. Biernacki, Christophe & Celeux, Gilles & Govaert, Gerard, 2003. "Choosing starting values for the EM algorithm for getting the highest likelihood in multivariate Gaussian mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 561-575, January.
    3. Bryan N Howie & Peter Donnelly & Jonathan Marchini, 2009. "A Flexible and Accurate Genotype Imputation Method for the Next Generation of Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo Rastelli & Michael Fop, 2020. "A stochastic block model for interaction lengths," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 485-512, June.
    2. You, Na & Dai, Hongsheng & Wang, Xueqin & Yu, Qingyun, 2024. "Sequential estimation for mixture of regression models for heterogeneous population," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. C. Biernacki & J. Jacques & C. Keribin, 2023. "A Survey on Model-Based Co-Clustering: High Dimension and Estimation Challenges," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(2), pages 332-381, July.
    4. Antonio Punzo & Paul. D. McNicholas, 2017. "Robust Clustering in Regression Analysis via the Contaminated Gaussian Cluster-Weighted Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(2), pages 249-293, July.
    5. Angelo Mazza & Antonio Punzo, 2020. "Mixtures of multivariate contaminated normal regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 787-822, April.
    6. Chun Yu & Weixin Yao & Guangren Yang, 2020. "A Selective Overview and Comparison of Robust Mixture Regression Estimators," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 176-202, April.
    7. Adrian O’Hagan & Arthur White, 2019. "Improved model-based clustering performance using Bayesian initialization averaging," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 201-231, March.
    8. Daniel Svensson & Matilda Rentoft & Anna M Dahlin & Emma Lundholm & Pall I Olason & Andreas Sjödin & Carin Nylander & Beatrice S Melin & Johan Trygg & Erik Johansson, 2020. "A whole-genome sequenced control population in northern Sweden reveals subregional genetic differences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Wan-Lun Wang, 2019. "Mixture of multivariate t nonlinear mixed models for multiple longitudinal data with heterogeneity and missing values," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 196-222, March.
    10. Mark S. Handcock & Adrian E. Raftery & Jeremy M. Tantrum, 2007. "Model‐based clustering for social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 301-354, March.
    11. Chuan Gao & Nan Wang & Xiuqing Guo & Julie T Ziegler & Kent D Taylor & Anny H Xiang & Yang Hai & Steven J Kridel & Jerry L Nadler & Fouad Kandeel & Leslie J Raffel & Yii-Der I Chen & Jill M Norris & J, 2015. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Common and Rare Variants to Identify Adiposity Loci in Hispanic Americans: The IRAS Family Study (IRASFS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Arman Oganisian & Nandita Mitra & Jason A. Roy, 2021. "A Bayesian nonparametric model for zero‐inflated outcomes: Prediction, clustering, and causal estimation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 125-135, March.
    13. Amanda F. Mejia, 2022. "Discussion on “distributional independent component analysis for diverse neuroimaging modalities” by Ben Wu, Subhadip Pal, Jian Kang, and Ying Guo," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1109-1112, September.
    14. Zhu, Xuwen & Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2018. "Manly transformation in finite mixture modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 190-208.
    15. Yao, Weixin & Wei, Yan & Yu, Chun, 2014. "Robust mixture regression using the t-distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 116-127.
    16. Lebret, Rémi & Iovleff, Serge & Langrognet, Florent & Biernacki, Christophe & Celeux, Gilles & Govaert, Gérard, 2015. "Rmixmod: The R Package of the Model-Based Unsupervised, Supervised, and Semi-Supervised Classification Mixmod Library," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i06).
    17. Rufo, M.J. & Pérez, C.J. & Martín, J., 2009. "Local parametric sensitivity for mixture models of lifetime distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1238-1244.
    18. Jeong Eun Lee & Christian Robert, 2013. "Imortance Sampling Schemes for Evidence Approximation in Mixture Models," Working Papers 2013-42, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    19. Faicel Chamroukhi, 2016. "Piecewise Regression Mixture for Simultaneous Functional Data Clustering and Optimal Segmentation," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(3), pages 374-411, October.
    20. Aßmann, Christian & Boysen-Hogrefe, Jens & Pape, Markus, 2012. "The directional identification problem in Bayesian factor analysis: An ex-post approach," Kiel Working Papers 1799, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:16:y:2017:i:4:p:275-289:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.