IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v15y2016i3p213-235n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing differentially expressed genes in dose-response studies and with ordinal phenotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Sweeney Elizabeth

    (Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA)

  • Crainiceanu Ciprian

    (Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA)

  • Gertheiss Jan

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Georg August University of Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

When testing for differentially expressed genes between more than two groups, the groups are often defined by dose levels in dose-response experiments or ordinal phenotypes, such as disease stages. We discuss the potential of a new approach that uses the levels’ ordering without making any structural assumptions, such as monotonicity, by testing for zero variance components in a mixed models framework. Since the mixed effects model approach borrows strength across doses/levels, the test proposed can also be applied when the number of dose levels/phenotypes is large and/or the number of subjects per group is small. We illustrate the new test in simulation studies and on several publicly available datasets and compare it to alternative testing procedures. All tests considered are implemented in R and are publicly available. The new approach offers a very fast and powerful way to test for differentially expressed genes between ordered groups without making restrictive assumptions with respect to the true relationship between factor levels and response.

Suggested Citation

  • Sweeney Elizabeth & Crainiceanu Ciprian & Gertheiss Jan, 2016. "Testing differentially expressed genes in dose-response studies and with ordinal phenotypes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 213-235, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:15:y:2016:i:3:p:213-235:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2015-0091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2015-0091
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sagmb-2015-0091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Dan & Shkedy Ziv & Yekutieli Dani & Burzykowski Tomasz & Göhlmann Hinrich W.H. & De Bondt An & Perera Tim & Geerts Tamara & Bijnens Luc, 2007. "Testing for Trends in Dose-Response Microarray Experiments: A Comparison of Several Testing Procedures, Multiplicity and Resampling-Based Inference," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Ciprian M. Crainiceanu & David Ruppert, 2004. "Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 165-185, February.
    3. Ciprian Crainiceanu & David Ruppert & Gerda Claeskens & M. P. Wand, 2005. "Exact likelihood ratio tests for penalised splines," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(1), pages 91-103, March.
    4. Jan Gertheiss & Sara Hogger & Cornelia Oberhauser & Gerhard Tutz, 2011. "Selection of ordinally scaled independent variables with applications to international classification of functioning core sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(3), pages 377-395, May.
    5. Gerhard Tutz & Jan Gertheiss, 2014. "Rating Scales as Predictors—The Old Question of Scale Level and Some Answers," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 357-376, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana-Maria Staicu & Yingxing Li & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu & David Ruppert, 2014. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Dependent Data with Applications to Longitudinal and Functional Data Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 932-949, December.
    2. Sonja Greven & Ciprian Crainiceanu, 2013. "On likelihood ratio testing for penalized splines," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 97(4), pages 387-402, October.
    3. Chen, Haiqiang & Fang, Ying & Li, Yingxing, 2015. "Estimation And Inference For Varying-Coefficient Models With Nonstationary Regressors Using Penalized Splines," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 753-777, August.
    4. repec:wyi:journl:002195 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2013-033 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ugarte, M.D. & Goicoa, T. & Militino, A.F. & Durbán, M., 2009. "Spline smoothing in small area trend estimation and forecasting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3616-3629, August.
    7. Ghosal, Rahul & Maity, Arnab, 2022. "A Score Based Test for Functional Linear Concurrent Regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 114-130.
    8. Yuanjia Wang & Huaihou Chen, 2012. "On Testing an Unspecified Function Through a Linear Mixed Effects Model with Multiple Variance Components," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1113-1125, December.
    9. Zaixing Li & Lixing Zhu, 2010. "On Variance Components in Semiparametric Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(3), pages 442-457, September.
    10. Annie Qu & Runze Li, 2006. "Quadratic Inference Functions for Varying-Coefficient Models with Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 379-391, June.
    11. J. D. Opsomer & G. Claeskens & M. G. Ranalli & G. Kauermann & F. J. Breidt, 2008. "Non‐parametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 265-286, February.
    12. Zanin, Luca & Marra, Giampiero, 2012. "Assessing the functional relationship between CO2 emissions and economic development using an additive mixed model approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1328-1337.
    13. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2018. "Tree-structured modelling of categorical predictors in generalized additive regression," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 737-758, September.
    14. Miao-Yu Tsai & Chuhsing Hsiao, 2008. "Computation of reference Bayesian inference for variance components in longitudinal studies," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 587-604, October.
    15. Yeojin Chung & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Vincent Dorie & Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu, 2013. "A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 685-709, October.
    16. Zaili Fang & Inyoung Kim & Jeesun Jung, 2018. "Semiparametric Kernel-Based Regression for Evaluating Interaction Between Pathway Effect and Covariate," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 129-152, March.
    17. Benjamin R. Saville & Amy H. Herring, 2009. "Testing Random Effects in the Linear Mixed Model Using Approximate Bayes Factors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 369-376, June.
    18. Milenković, Marina & Glavić, Draženko & Maričić, Milica, 2019. "Determining factors affecting congestion pricing acceptability," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 58-74.
    19. Long Qu & Tobias Guennel & Scott L. Marshall, 2013. "Linear Score Tests for Variance Components in Linear Mixed Models and Applications to Genetic Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 883-892, December.
    20. Oliver E. Lee & Thomas M. Braun, 2012. "Permutation Tests for Random Effects in Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 486-493, June.
    21. Benjamin Säfken & Thomas Kneib, 2020. "Conditional covariance penalties for mixed models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(3), pages 990-1010, September.
    22. Zhenzhen Zhang & Thomas M. Braun & Karen E. Peterson & Howard Hu & Martha M. Téllez-Rojo & Brisa N. Sánchez, 2018. "Extending Tests of Random Effects to Assess for Measurement Invariance in Factor Models," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(3), pages 634-650, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:15:y:2016:i:3:p:213-235:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.