IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v13y2014i2p173-190n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scan statistics analysis for detection of introns in time-course tiling array data

Author

Listed:
  • Reiner-Benaim Anat

    (Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Davis Ronald W.

    (Stanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA)

  • Juneau Kara

    (Stanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA)

Abstract

A tiling array yields a series of abundance measurements across the genome using evenly spaced probes. These data can be used for detecting sequences that exhibit a particular behavior. Scanning window statistics are often employed for testing each probe while accounting for local correlation and smoothing noisy measurements. However, window testing may yield false probe discoveries around the sequences and false non-discoveries within the sequences, resulting in biased predicted intervals. We propose to avoid this problem by stipulating that a sequence of interest can appear at most once within a defined region, such as a gene; thus, only one window statistic is considered per region. This substantially reduces the number of tests and hence, is potentially more powerful. We compare this approach to a genome-wise scan that does not require pre-defined search regions, but considers clumps of adjacent probe discoveries. Simulations show that the gene-wise search maintains the nominal FDR level, while the genome-wise scan yields FDR that exceeds the nominal level for low interval effects, and achieves slightly less power. Using arrays to map introns in yeast, we identified 71% of the previously published introns, detected nine previously undiscovered introns, and observed no false intron discoveries by either method.

Suggested Citation

  • Reiner-Benaim Anat & Davis Ronald W. & Juneau Kara, 2014. "Scan statistics analysis for detection of introns in time-course tiling array data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 173-190, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:173-190:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2013-0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2013-0038
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sagmb-2013-0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kechris Katerina J & Biehs Brian & Kornberg Thomas B, 2010. "Generalizing Moving Averages for Tiling Arrays Using Combined P-Value Statistics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-31, August.
    2. Genovese, Christopher R. & Wasserman, Larry, 2006. "Exceedance Control of the False Discovery Proportion," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1408-1417, December.
    3. D. O. Siegmund & N. R. Zhang & B. Yakir, 2011. "False discovery rate for scanning statistics," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(4), pages 979-985.
    4. Zhenyu Xu & Wu Wei & Julien Gagneur & Fabiana Perocchi & Sandra Clauder-Münster & Jurgi Camblong & Elisa Guffanti & Françoise Stutz & Wolfgang Huber & Lars M. Steinmetz, 2009. "Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7232), pages 1033-1037, February.
    5. Perone Pacifico, M. & Genovese, C. & Verdinelli, I. & Wasserman, L., 2007. "Scan clustering: A false discovery approach," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1441-1469, August.
    6. M. Perone Pacifico & C. Genovese & I. Verdinelli & L. Wasserman, 2004. "False Discovery Control for Random Fields," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 1002-1014, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Farcomeni, 2009. "Generalized Augmentation to Control the False Discovery Exceedance in Multiple Testing," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 501-517, September.
    2. Anat Reiner-Benaim, 2016. "Scan Statistic Tail Probability Assessment Based on Process Covariance and Window Size," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 717-745, September.
    3. Pallavi Basu & Luella Fu & Alessio Saretto & Wenguang Sun, 2021. "Empirical Bayes Control of the False Discovery Exceedance," Working Papers 2115, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    4. Anthony Cheng & Disheng Mao & Yuping Zhang & Joseph Glaz & Zhengqing Ouyang, 2023. "Translocation detection from Hi‐C data via scan statistics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1306-1317, June.
    5. Niels Lundtorp Olsen & Alessia Pini & Simone Vantini, 2021. "False discovery rate for functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 784-809, September.
    6. Konrad Abramowicz & Alessia Pini & Lina Schelin & Sara Sjöstedt de Luna & Aymeric Stamm & Simone Vantini, 2023. "Domain selection and familywise error rate for functional data: A unified framework," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1119-1132, June.
    7. Perone Pacifico, M. & Genovese, C. & Verdinelli, I. & Wasserman, L., 2007. "Scan clustering: A false discovery approach," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1441-1469, August.
    8. Chen, Song Xi & Guo, Bin & Qiu, Yumou, 2023. "Testing and signal identification for two-sample high-dimensional covariances via multi-level thresholding," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1337-1354.
    9. Zhang, Chunming & Lu, Yuefeng & Johnstone, Tom & Oakes, Terry & Davidson, Richard J., 2008. "Efficient modeling and inference for event-related fMRI data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4859-4871, June.
    10. Bingnan Li & Patrice Zeis & Yujie Zhang & Alisa Alekseenko & Eliska Fürst & Yerma Pareja Sanchez & Gen Lin & Manu M. Tekkedil & Ilaria Piazza & Lars M. Steinmetz & Vicent Pelechano, 2023. "Differential regulation of mRNA stability modulates transcriptional memory and facilitates environmental adaptation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Guillermo Durand & Gilles Blanchard & Pierre Neuvial & Etienne Roquain, 2020. "Post hoc false positive control for structured hypotheses," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1114-1148, December.
    12. G�nther Fink & Margaret McConnell & Sebastian Vollmer, 2014. "Testing for heterogeneous treatment effects in experimental data: false discovery risks and correction procedures," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 44-57, January.
    13. Joshua Habiger & David Watts & Michael Anderson, 2017. "Multiple testing with heterogeneous multinomial distributions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 562-570, June.
    14. Qingyun Cai & Hock Peng Chan, 2017. "A Double Application of the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure for Testing Batched Hypotheses," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 429-443, June.
    15. Sudipto Banerjee, 2023. "Discussion of “Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss” by Willi Maurer, Frank Bretz, and Xiaolei Xun," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2798-2801, December.
    16. Georgios Sermpinis & Arman Hassanniakalager & Charalampos Stasinakis & Ioannis Psaradellis, 2018. "Technical Analysis and Discrete False Discovery Rate: Evidence from MSCI Indices," Papers 1811.06766, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    17. Tsui, Kam-Wah & Tang, Shijie, 2007. "Simultaneous testing of multiple hypotheses using generalized p-values," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(12), pages 1362-1370, July.
    18. Ruodu Wang & Aaditya Ramdas, 2022. "False discovery rate control with e‐values," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 822-852, July.
    19. Komal Soni & Anusree Sivadas & Attila Horvath & Nikolay Dobrev & Rippei Hayashi & Leo Kiss & Bernd Simon & Klemens Wild & Irmgard Sinning & Tamás Fischer, 2023. "Mechanistic insights into RNA surveillance by the canonical poly(A) polymerase Pla1 of the MTREC complex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Michele Guindani & Peter Müller & Song Zhang, 2009. "A Bayesian discovery procedure," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 905-925, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:173-190:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.