IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/revmkt/v21y2023i1p187-194n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Improve the Performance of Email Marketing Campaigns? A Field Experiment Using the Authority Principle to Improve Email Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Defau Laurens

    (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz , Austria)

  • Zauner Alexander

    (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz , Austria)

  • Sycik Anna

    (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz , Austria)

Abstract

In marketing, authority figures are often used to convince the audience: think of the doctor in the white coat or the professor recommending a product. Some of these techniques can be translated to the world of email marketing, which sparked our interest to see if recipients are more eager to open an email when it is send by the CEO of a company. For this project, we collaborated with a digital marketing company and run two randomized field experiments: examining if a small change in the email design – adding CEO to the sender line – has an effect on performance. Our results indicate that organizations can use authority figures to improve the performance of their email campaigns. However, there might be important differences between target groups, suggesting that specific audiences are more easily seduced by job titles than others.

Suggested Citation

  • Defau Laurens & Zauner Alexander & Sycik Anna, 2023. "How to Improve the Performance of Email Marketing Campaigns? A Field Experiment Using the Authority Principle to Improve Email Performance," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 187-194, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:21:y:2023:i:1:p:187-194:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/roms-2022-0095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/roms-2022-0095
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/roms-2022-0095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt P. Munz & Minah H. Jung & Adam L. Alter, 2020. "Name Similarity Encourages Generosity: A Field Experiment in Email Personalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1071-1091, November.
    2. Jung, Jae Min & Kellaris, James J., 2006. "Responsiveness to authority appeals among young French and American consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 735-744, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodriguez, Virginie & Sangle-Ferriere, Marion, 2023. "Do supermarkets’ emails have any value for their customers? The effect of emails’ content and interestingness on customers’ attitude and engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Qin, Chang-Xiong & Liu, Zhao, 2022. "Reference price effect of partially similar online products in the consideration stage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 70-81.
    3. Lieberman, Alicea & Schroeder, Juliana & Amir, On, 2022. "A voice inside my head: The psychological and behavioral consequences of auditory technologies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Thakor, Mrugank V. & Goneau-Lessard, Karine, 2009. "Development of a scale to measure skepticism of social advertising among adolescents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1342-1349, December.
    5. Laurens Defau & Alexander Zauner, 2023. "Personalized subject lines in email marketing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 727-733, December.
    6. Leif Nelson & Duncan Simester & K. Sudhir, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Marketing Science and Field Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1033-1038, November.
    7. Halder, Deepa & Pradhan, Debasis & Roy Chaudhuri, Himadri, 2021. "Forty-five years of celebrity credibility and endorsement literature: Review and learnings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 397-415.
    8. Gonzalez-Jimenez, Hector & Fastoso, Fernando & Fukukawa, Kyoko, 2019. "How independence and interdependence moderate the self-congruity effect on brand attitude: A study of east and west," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 293-300.
    9. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Alemu, Mohammed Hussen & Gallogly, Joseph Karlton & Menon, R. G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2020. "Assisting sustainable food consumption: The effects of quality signals stemming from consumers and stores in online and physical grocery retailing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 458-471.
    10. Ike Silver & Deborah A. Small, 2024. "Put Your Mouth Where Your Money Is: A Field Experiment Encouraging Donors to Share About Charity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 392-406, March.
    11. Laufer, Daniel & Garrett, Tony C. & Ning, Bo, 2018. "The Moderating Role of Power Distance on the Reaction of Consumers to the CEO as a Spokesperson During a Product Harm Crisis: Insights From China and South Korea," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 215-221.
    12. Sherman, Arie & Barokas, Guy, 2023. "The effect of name letter on market prices: Field experiments on seller behavior," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Bojana Većkalov & Sandra J. Geiger & František Bartoš & Mathew P. White & Bastiaan T. Rutjens & Frenk Harreveld & Federica Stablum & Berkan Akın & Alaa Aldoh & Jinhao Bai & Frida Berglund & Aleša Brat, 2024. "A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(10), pages 1892-1905, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital marketing; email marketing; field experiment; behavioral economics; authority principle; authority effect;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:21:y:2023:i:1:p:187-194:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.