IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v6y2010i1n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Variable Selection Approaches for Dynamic Treatment Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Biernot Peter

    (McGill University)

  • Moodie Erica E. M.

    (McGill University)

Abstract

In estimating optimal adaptive treatment strategies, the tailor treatment variables used for patient profiles are typically hand-picked by experts. However these variables may not yield an estimated optimal dynamic regime that is close to the optimal regime which uses all variables. The question of selecting tailoring variables has not yet been answered satisfactorily, though promising new approaches have been proposed. We compare the use of reducts--a variable selection tool from computer sciences--to the S-score criterion proposed by Gunter and colleagues in 2007 for suggesting collections of useful variables for treatment regime tailoring. Although the reducts-based approach promised several advantages such as the ability to account for correlation among tailoring variables, it proved to have several undesirable properties. The S-score performed better, though it too exhibited some disappointing qualities.

Suggested Citation

  • Biernot Peter & Moodie Erica E. M., 2010. "A Comparison of Variable Selection Approaches for Dynamic Treatment Regimes," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:6:y:2010:i:1:n:6
    DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1178
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1557-4679.1178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Laan Mark J. & Petersen Maya L, 2007. "Causal Effect Models for Realistic Individualized Treatment and Intention to Treat Rules," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-55, March.
    2. S. A. Murphy, 2003. "Optimal dynamic treatment regimes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 331-355, May.
    3. van der Laan Mark J. & Petersen Maya L & Joffe Marshall M, 2005. "History-Adjusted Marginal Structural Models and Statically-Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimens," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-41, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiacheng Wu & Nina Galanter & Susan M. Shortreed & Erica E.M. Moodie, 2022. "Ranking tailoring variables for constructing individualized treatment rules: An application to schizophrenia," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 309-330, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van der Laan Mark J., 2010. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Based Causal Inference: Part I," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-45, February.
    2. van der Laan Mark J. & Gruber Susan, 2010. "Collaborative Double Robust Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-71, May.
    3. Kristin A. Linn & Eric B. Laber & Leonard A. Stefanski, 2017. "Interactive -Learning for Quantiles," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 638-649, April.
    4. Q. Clairon & R. Henderson & N. J. Young & E. D. Wilson & C. J. Taylor, 2021. "Adaptive treatment and robust control," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 223-236, March.
    5. Jelena Bradic & Weijie Ji & Yuqian Zhang, 2021. "High-dimensional Inference for Dynamic Treatment Effects," Papers 2110.04924, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    6. Rich Benjamin & Moodie Erica E. M. & A. Stephens David, 2016. "Influence Re-weighted G-Estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 157-177, May.
    7. Jacqueline A. Mauro & Edward H. Kennedy & Daniel Nagin, 2020. "Instrumental variable methods using dynamic interventions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1523-1551, October.
    8. Jiacheng Wu & Nina Galanter & Susan M. Shortreed & Erica E.M. Moodie, 2022. "Ranking tailoring variables for constructing individualized treatment rules: An application to schizophrenia," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 309-330, March.
    9. Zhen Li & Jie Chen & Eric Laber & Fang Liu & Richard Baumgartner, 2023. "Optimal Treatment Regimes: A Review and Empirical Comparison," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(3), pages 427-463, December.
    10. Jin Wang & Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2022. "Semiparametric single-index models for optimal treatment regimens with censored outcomes," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 744-763, October.
    11. Shonosuke Sugasawa & Hisashi Noma, 2021. "Efficient screening of predictive biomarkers for individual treatment selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 249-257, March.
    12. Jingxiang Chen & Yufeng Liu & Donglin Zeng & Rui Song & Yingqi Zhao & Michael R. Kosorok, 2016. "Comment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 942-947, July.
    13. Han, Sukjin, 2021. "Identification in nonparametric models for dynamic treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 132-147.
    14. Durlauf, Steven N. & Navarro, Salvador & Rivers, David A., 2016. "Model uncertainty and the effect of shall-issue right-to-carry laws on crime," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 32-67.
    15. Kastoryano, Stephen, 2024. "Biological, Behavioural and Spurious Selection on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist," IZA Discussion Papers 16995, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Michael C Knaus & Michael Lechner & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(1), pages 134-161.
    17. Yufan Zhao & Donglin Zeng & Mark A. Socinski & Michael R. Kosorok, 2011. "Reinforcement Learning Strategies for Clinical Trials in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1422-1433, December.
    18. Luo, Yu & Graham, Daniel J. & McCoy, Emma J., 2023. "Semiparametric Bayesian doubly robust causal estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117944, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Anders Bredahl Kock & Martin Thyrsgaard, 2017. "Optimal sequential treatment allocation," Papers 1705.09952, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    20. Yusuke Narita, 2018. "Toward an Ethical Experiment," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2127, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:6:y:2010:i:1:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.