IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ecqcon/v28y2013i1p37-44n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Likelihood Based Control Charts

Author

Listed:
  • Variyath A. M.

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's, NL A1C 5S7)

Abstract

The success of the implementation of control chart depends upon the assumptions made on the distribution of the quality characteristics. If the distributional assumption deviates too much from the true one or if it is misspecified, the performance of the control chart is seriously affected and one may make wrong conclusions about the process. To avoid such situations, we propose a new class of control chart based on the empirical likelihood (EL). We propose to monitor the EL ratio statistic for mean and use resampling method to arrive at its empirical distribution which is inverted to obtain the control limits. Our simulation results clearly indicated that EL control charts have a comparable performance with Shewhart control chart, when the distribution of the quality characteristic follows a normal distribution. When the distribution of quality characteristics are misspecified, the EL control chart shows a better performance with all competing control charts. Finally, our proposed method is illustrated by a real example.

Suggested Citation

  • Variyath A. M., 2013. "Empirical Likelihood Based Control Charts," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 28(1), pages 37-44, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:37-44:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/eqc-2013-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2013-0011
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/eqc-2013-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Chen, 2002. "Using empirical likelihood methods to obtain range restricted weights in regression estimators for surveys," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 230-237, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaogang Duan & Guosheng Yin, 2017. "Ensemble Approaches to Estimating the Population Mean with Missing Response," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 899-917, December.
    2. Denis Devaud & Yves Tillé, 2019. "Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25-years-old successful optimization problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1033-1065, December.
    3. Jae Kwang Kim & Mingue Park, 2010. "Calibration Estimation in Survey Sampling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 21-39, April.
    4. Nicholas-James Clavet & Jean-Yves Duclos & Bernard Fortin & Steeve Marchand, 2012. "Le Québec, 2004-2030 : une analyse de micro-simulation," CIRANO Project Reports 2012rp-16, CIRANO.
    5. Jan Pablo Burgard & Ralf Münnich & Martin Rupp, 2019. "A Generalized Calibration Approach Ensuring Coherent Estimates with Small Area Constraints," Research Papers in Economics 2019-10, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    6. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    7. Changbao Wu & Shixiao Zhang, 2019. "Comments on: Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25 years old successful optimization problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1082-1086, December.
    8. Dong Liang & Genevieve Nesslage & Michael Wilberg & Thomas Miller, 2017. "Bayesian Calibration of Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus) Abundance Indices Based on Probability Surveys," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 481-497, December.
    9. Denis Heng Yan Leung & Ken Yamada & Biao Zhang, 2015. "Enriching Surveys with Supplementary Data and its Application to Studying Wage Regression," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 155-179, March.
    10. Shixiao Zhang & Peisong Han & Changbao Wu, 2023. "Calibration Techniques Encompassing Survey Sampling, Missing Data Analysis and Causal Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 165-192, August.
    11. Jean-Francois Beaumont & Cynthia Bocci, 2008. "Another look at ridge calibration," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 5-20.
    12. Yves G. Berger, 2016. "Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Rao-Hartley-Cochran Sampling Design," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 721-735, September.
    13. Jing Cheng & Dylan S. Small, 2021. "Semiparametric models and inference for the effect of a treatment when the outcome is nonnegative with clumping at zero," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1187-1201, December.
    14. M. Rueda & J.F. Muñoz, 2009. "New Model‐assisted Estimators for the Distribution Function Using the Pseudo Empirical Likelihood Method," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(2), pages 227-244, May.
    15. Yves G. Berger & Ewa Kabzińska, 2020. "Empirical Likelihood Approach for Aligning Information from Multiple Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 54-74, April.
    16. Peisong Han & Linglong Kong & Jiwei Zhao & Xingcai Zhou, 2019. "A general framework for quantile estimation with incomplete data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 305-333, April.
    17. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Malay Ghosh, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for small area estimation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(2), pages 473-480.
    18. Ying Sheng & Yifei Sun & Chiung‐Yu Huang & Mi‐Ok Kim, 2022. "Synthesizing external aggregated information in the presence of population heterogeneity: A penalized empirical likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 679-690, June.
    19. Jing Lv & Chaohui Guo & Jibo Wu, 2019. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference via the modified Cholesky decomposition for quantile varying coefficient models with longitudinal data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 999-1032, September.
    20. Changbao Wu & Wilson W. Lu, 2016. "Calibration Weighting Methods for Complex Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 79-98, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:37-44:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.