IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/conjap/v22y2010i1-2p47-74n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divided society model and social cleavages in Japanese politics: No alignment by social class, but dealignment of rural-urban division

Author

Listed:
  • Chiavacci David

    (dachiava@zedat.fu-berlin.de)

Abstract

In recent years, Japan has been marked by fundamental changes. From the late 1990s onward, a new model of Japan as a divided society has replaced the former model of Japan as a general middle class society with a very high degree of equality regarding chances and outcome. Moreover, the national elections of 2007 and 2009 resulted in a historical defeat of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and in a new government led by the Democratic Party Japan (DPJ). Using the framework of social cleavage theory, this paper analyses the relationship between these two changes in a historical perspective. It raises the questions of whether and how the new divided society model is connected to the recent change of power. Has the ascendance of the divided society model and its establishment as the dominant model and common sense played a role in the crushing defeat of the LDP and the change in power in the two recent elections? The main argument is that postwar Japanese politics and over five decades of LDP dominance were marked by a social cleavage between urban and rural areas. While a social cleavage by social class never fully developed in Japanese politics, stable and strong support by rural voters was the main pillar on which the LDP's long success story was based. The new model of Japan as a divided society has played an important role in the change in power in the two recent elections. Although this new divided society model has not led to an alignment by social class – as one may have expected – it has resulted in a dealignment in the rural-urban division. The demise of the LDP was primarily due to its recent electoral defeat in rural areas, where it had once been invincible.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiavacci David, 2010. "Divided society model and social cleavages in Japanese politics: No alignment by social class, but dealignment of rural-urban division," Contemporary Japan, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1-2), pages 47-74, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:conjap:v:22:y:2010:i:1-2:p:47-74:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/cj.2010.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cj.2010.005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cj.2010.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebick, Marcus, 2005. "The Japanese Employment System: Adapting to a New Economic Environment," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199247240.
    2. Michael Förster & Marco Mira d'Ercole, 2005. "Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 22, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Chiavacci & Sebastien Lechevalier, 2017. "Japanese Political Economy Revisited," Working Papers halshs-02079751, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GENDA, Yuji & KURODA, Sachiko & OHTA, Souichi, 2011. "Does downsizing take a toll on retained staff? An analysis of increased working hours during recessions using Japanese micro data," ISS Discussion Paper Series (series F) f154, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo.
    2. Oshio, Takashi & 小塩, 隆士 & オシオ, タカシ & Kobayashi, Miki & 小林, 美樹 & コバヤシ, ミキ, 2009. "Regional income inequality and happiness: Evidence from Japan," PIE/CIS Discussion Paper 460, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Ji-Whan Yun, 2016. "The Setback in Political Entrepreneurship and Employment Dualization in Japan, 1998–2012," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 473-495, September.
    4. Miyamoto Hiroaki, 2016. "Growth and non-regular employment," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 523-554, June.
    5. Chatzouz, Moustafa, 2014. "Government Debt and Wealth Inequality: Theory and Insights from Altruism," MPRA Paper 77007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. ., 2010. "Income Distribution and Social Welfare Policy: Issues and Strategy," Chapters, in: The Korean Economy in Transition, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Bognanno, Michael & Kambayashi, Ryo, 2013. "Trends in worker displacement penalties in Japan: 1991–2005," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 41-57.
    8. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:529-556 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Grech, Aaron George, 2010. "Assessing the sustainability of pension reforms in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43865, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Henry S. Farber, 2007. "Labor Market Adjustment to Globalization: Long-Term Employment in the United States and Japan," Working Papers 1040, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    11. Hiroshi Ono, 2018. "Career mobility in the embedded market: a study of the Japanese financial sector," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(5), pages 339-365, December.
    12. Chakraborty, Lekha S., 2006. "Fiscal decentralisation and gender responsive budgeting in Mexico: Some observations," Working Papers 06/40, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    13. Georges Menahem, 2007. "The decommodified security ratio: A tool for assessing European social protection systems," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 69-103, October.
    14. Clauss, Markus & Schnabel, Reinhold, 2008. "Distributional and behavioural effects of the German labour market reform," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 41(4), pages 431-446.
    15. Koen Caminada & Chen Wang, 2011. "Disentangling Income Inequality and the Redistributive Effect of Social Transfers and Taxes in 36 LIS Countries," LIS Working papers 567, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    16. Kenta IKEUCHI & Kyoji FUKAO & Cristiano PERUGINI, 2021. "Establishment Size, Workforce Composition and the College Wage Gap in Japan," Discussion papers 21022, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Liana C. Sayer & Lynn Prince Cooke, 2012. "The Context of Relative Equality: Comparing Educational Gradients in the Gendered Division of Labor in Three Liberal Markets," LIS Working papers 578, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    18. Hori, Masahiro & Iwamoto, Koichiro, 2012. "Lifetime Labor Income and the Erosion of Seniority-Based Wages in Japan: Evidence Based on Administrative Data Records," CIS Discussion paper series 554, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    19. Takao KATO & Naomi KODAMA, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity in the Workplace: Evidence from Japan," Discussion papers 16063, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    20. Lehmberg, Derek & Dhanaraj, Charles & Funai, Akie, 2013. "What do we make of Japan? Myths and realities," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 219-229.
    21. Harald Conrad & Hendrik Meyer-Ohle, 2022. "Training Regimes and Diversity: Experiences of Young Foreign Employees in Japanese Headquarters," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 199-216, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:conjap:v:22:y:2010:i:1-2:p:47-74:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.