IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boi/isrerv/v18y2020i1p59-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Labor Market In The Coronavirus Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Leah Achdut

Abstract

This review summarizes a paper given at the Israel Economic Association conference held in mid-June 2020. It presents an index for the severity of the lockdown and restrictions imposed immediately after the onset of the crisis by the Israeli government in comparison to other countries, and a snapshot of the labor market in Israel since the outbreak of the pandemic, based on various data sources. These include the unemployment rate and characteristics of the workers cut off from their work place and the patterns of employers’ responses in various economic sectors. It was found that, in international comparison, Israel’s lockdown and restrictions policy was stringent. The percentage of workers cut off from their work place in May ranged from 18 percent to 22 percent, based on the source of the data, with the adverse impact on the weaker segments of the labor market being all the more evident. The high-tech sectors reacted with greater flexibility and a more diverse mix: they had many employees working from home and, relative to other sectors, were less inclined to place employees on involuntary unpaid leave, but were more likely to reduce wages and even lay off workers. At the other end of the scale was the retail sector, especially the food and beverages industry, which was hard hit by the restrictions placed on the public sphere. These were highly likely to use unpaid leave as their almost exclusive response, though also layoffs, and they reduced pay for many of their employees. Against the backdrop of the almost exclusive use of the unpaid leave mechanism by employers, a discussion is dedicated to the Israeli unpaid leave scheme and alternative employee retention schemes implemented by advanced economies, as well as of the role of unemployment insurance in the coronavirus crisis. The discussion underscores the advantages of an unpaid-leave scheme under which the government compensates all workers cut off from their work place as a uniform percentage of their pay rather than according to the eligibility conditions for unemployment benefits, through the employers, and the flexible unpaid-leave scheme, which allows the combination of part-time work with unemployment benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Leah Achdut, 2020. "The Labor Market In The Coronavirus Crisis," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 18(1), pages 59-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:boi:isrerv:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:59-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://boiwebrepec.azurefd.net/RePEc/boi/isrerv/IsER_18_2020_1_059-079.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams-Prassl, Abi & Boneva, Teodora & Golin, Marta & Rauh, Christopher, 2020. "Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Giulia Giupponi & Camille Landais, 2023. "Subsidizing Labour Hoarding in Recessions: The Employment and Welfare Effects of Short-time Work," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(4), pages 1963-2005.
    3. Landais, Camille & Giupponi, Giulia, 2018. "Subsidizing Labor Hoarding in Recessions: The Employment & Welfare Effects of Short Time Work," CEPR Discussion Papers 13310, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tehila Refaeli & Netta Achdut, 2021. "Financial Strain and Loneliness among Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Psychosocial Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adermon, Adrian & Laun, Lisa & Lind, Patrik & Olsson, Martin & Sauermann, Jan & Sjögren , Anna, 2022. "Earnings losses and the role of the welfare state during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Sweden," Working Paper Series 2022:20, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    2. Ainaa, Carmen & Brunetti, Irene & Mussida, Chiara & Scicchitano, Sergio, 2021. "Who lost the most? Distributive effects of COVID-19 pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 829, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Carmen Aina & Irene Brunetti & Chiara Mussida & Sergio Scicchitano, 2023. "Distributional effects of COVID-19," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(1), pages 221-256, March.
    4. Oscar Afonso, 2023. "Losers and losses of COVID-19: a directed technical change analysis with fiscal and monetary policies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1777-1821, June.
    5. Cseres-Gergely, Zsombor & Kecht, Valentin & Le Blanc, Julia & Onorante, Luca, 2024. "The economic impact of general vs. targeted lockdowns: New insights from Italian municipalities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Federico Huneeus & Joseph P. Kaboski & Mauricio Larrain & Sergio L. Schmukler & Mario Vera, 2022. "The Distribution of Crisis Credit: Effects on Firm Indebtedness and Aggregate Risk," NBER Working Papers 29774, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Werner Hölzl & Michael Böheim & Klaus Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Thomas Leoni, 2021. "Staatliche Hilfsmaßnahmen für Unternehmen in der COVID-19-Krise. Eine begleitende Analyse operativer Aspekte und Unternehmenseinschätzungen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66624, April.
    8. Borland, Jeff & Hunt, Jennifer, 2021. "Did the Australian Jobkeeper Program Save Jobs by Subsidizing Temporary Layoffs?," IZA Discussion Papers 14859, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Michaillat, Pascal & Saez, Emmanuel, 2019. "Beveridgean Unemployment Gap," CEPR Discussion Papers 14132, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/2ju03cb3kc9a3986bsibii70hd is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4urlmja10p80kqireg3ejlnogi is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Yusuf Mercan & Benjamin Schoefer, 2020. "Jobs and Matches: Quits, Replacement Hiring, and Vacancy Chains," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 101-124, March.
    13. Veronica Guerrieri & Guido Lorenzoni & Ludwig Straub & Iván Werning, 2022. "Macroeconomic Implications of COVID-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(5), pages 1437-1474, May.
    14. Marcin Kolasa & Michał Rubaszek & Małgorzata Walerych, 2019. "Are flexible working hours helpful in stabilizing unemployment?," NBP Working Papers 319, Narodowy Bank Polski.
    15. Daniel Kopp & Michael Siegenthaler, 2021. "Short-Time Work and Unemployment in and after the Great Recession [Does Employment Protection Inhibit Labor Market Flexibility? Lessons from Germany, France, and Belgium]," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 2283-2321.
    16. Luca Citino & Andrea Linarello, 2022. "The impact of Chinese import competition on Italian manufacturing," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 702-731, August.
    17. David R. Agrawal & Aline Bütikofer, 2022. "Public finance in the era of the COVID-19 crisis," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(6), pages 1349-1372, December.
    18. Tito Boeri & Pierre Cahuc, 2022. "Labor Market Insurance Policies in the XXI Century," Post-Print hal-03878719, HAL.
    19. Carbonnier, Clément & Malgouyres, Clément & Py, Loriane & Urvoy, Camille, 2022. "Who benefits from tax incentives? The heterogeneous wage incidence of a tax credit," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Simon Jäger & Benjamin Schoefer & Josef Zweimüller, 2023. "Marginal Jobs and Job Surplus: A Test of the Efficiency of Separations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(3), pages 1265-1303.
    21. Koray Aktas, 2021. "Characterizing Life-Cycle Dynamics of Annual Days of Work, Wages, and Cross-Covariances," Working Papers 465, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics.
    22. Adams-Prassl, Abi & Boneva, Teodora & Golin, Marta & Rauh, Christopher, 2020. "Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boi:isrerv:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:59-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yossi Yakhin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boigvil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.