IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v115y2024i1p112-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Cashed the Rent Gap? An Alternative Narration of a Shantytown Renovation Project in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Chunhui Liu
  • Yaqi Yuan
  • Xiaoming Qi

Abstract

Despite research on shantytown redevelopment highlighting socio‐spatial exclusion, the viewpoint frequently disseminated through social media depicts it as a massive wealth‐creation movement in China. This paper intends to provide evidence that evicted residents of a shantytown in Nanjing, China, share a common identity with the encroaching gentrifiers – the housing class. By shaping the housing class, an increasing number of urban residents become micro‐agents of housing financialization, allowing the rent gap to be frequently opened even without producing a ‘higher and better’ space. This enables capital to circulate and accumulate within a broader temporal and spatial scope. However, both the class imagination of the housing class and the financial speculation in the housing market are based on the expectation of continuous price growth. This is unsustainable and leaves the real housing needs out of the housing market, which is detrimental to housing equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunhui Liu & Yaqi Yuan & Xiaoming Qi, 2024. "Who Cashed the Rent Gap? An Alternative Narration of a Shantytown Renovation Project in Nanjing, China," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(1), pages 112-125, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:115:y:2024:i:1:p:112-125
    DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12606
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/tesg.12606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kangni Chai & Changchun Feng, 2021. "Sons, daughters, and differentiated tenure choice of multiple homes: evidence from urban China," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 644-670, May.
    2. Lu, Zhentong & Zhang, Sisi & Hong, Jian, 2021. "Examining the impact of home purchase restrictions on China's housing market," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Youqin Huang & Daichun Yi & William A. V. Clark, 2021. "A homeownership paradox: why do Chinese homeowners rent the housing they live in?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 1318-1340, October.
    4. Josh Ryan-Collins & Cameron Murray, 2023. "When homes earn more than jobs: the rentierization of the Australian housing market," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 1888-1917, November.
    5. Alice Romainville, 2017. "The Financialization of Housing Production in Brussels," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 623-641, July.
    6. Matthew Desmond, 2018. "Heavy is the House: Rent Burden among the American Urban Poor," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 160-170, January.
    7. David Miles & Victoria Monro, 2021. "UK house prices and three decades of decline in the risk-free real interest rate [‘Demographics and Real Interest Rates: Inspecting the Mechanism’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 36(108), pages 627-684.
    8. Brett Christophers, 2022. "Mind the rent gap: Blackstone, housing investment and the reordering of urban rent surfaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 698-716, March.
    9. Dunleavy, Patrick, 1979. "The Urban Basis of Political Alignment: Social Class, Domestic Property Ownership, and State Intervention in Consumption Processes," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 409-443, October.
    10. Chris Hamnett, 2003. "Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2401-2426, November.
    11. Fulong Wu, 2015. "Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 6-26, January.
    12. Peng Li & Shunfeng Song, 2016. "What Pushes Up China’s Urban Housing Price So High?," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 128-141, March.
    13. Fulong Wu, 2015. "Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 6-26, January.
    14. Fulong Wu & Jie Chen & Fenghua Pan & Nick Gallent & Fangzhu Zhang, 2020. "Assetization: The Chinese Path to Housing Financialization," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(5), pages 1483-1499, September.
    15. Deng, Yongheng & Girardin, Eric & Joyeux, Roselyne, 2018. "Fundamentals and the volatility of real estate prices in China: A sequential modelling strategy," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 205-222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Fulong, 2022. "Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Chen, Jie & Wu, Fulong, 2022. "Housing and land financialization under the state ownership of land in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Manuel B. Aalbers, 2017. "The Variegated Financialization of Housing," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 542-554, July.
    4. Isil Erol, 2019. "New Geographies of Residential Capitalism: Financialization of the Turkish Housing Market Since the Early 2000s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 724-740, July.
    5. Oguzhan Cepni & Rangan Gupta & Yigit Onay, 2022. "The role of investor sentiment in forecasting housing returns in China: A machine learning approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1725-1740, December.
    6. Su, Xing & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "Neoliberal financial governance and its transformation under real estate boom and bust: The case of Ordos City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Mengzhu Zhang & Si Qiao & Xiang Yan, 2021. "The secondary circuit of capital and the making of the suburban property boom in postcrisis Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1331-1355, September.
    8. Rickman, Dan S. & Wang, Hongbo, 2016. "Regional Housing Supply Elasticity in China 1999-2013: A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis," MPRA Paper 69157, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Natacha Aveline-Dubach & Guillaume Blandeau, 2019. "The political economy of transit value capture: The changing business model of the MTRC in Hong Kong [L'économie politique de la captation de valeur foncière (Land value capture): le nouveau modèle," Post-Print halshs-02100616, HAL.
    10. Le Tang & Fengqin Zhou & Xueliang Feng & Yali Luo, 2018. "Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Chen, Yawei, 2022. "Financialising urban redevelopment: Transforming Shanghai’s waterfront," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Lisha He & Mia M Bennett & Ronghao Jiang, 2022. "The uneven geography of real estate investment by Mainland Chinese state-owned and private enterprises in the U.S.: Local market conditions, migration, and ethnic networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 653-675, June.
    13. Jiang, Yanpeng & Mohabir, Nalini & Ma, Renfeng & Zhu, Pengyu, 2017. "Sorting through Neoliberal Variations of Ghost Cities in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 445-453.
    14. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song, 2019. "Perspectives of Socio-Spatial Differentiation from Soaring Housing Prices: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Natacha Aveline-Dubach & Guillaume Blandeau, 2019. "The political economy of transit value capture: The changing business model of the MTRC in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3415-3431, December.
    16. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2017. "Centrality of Land in the Capital Accumulation Regime in China [La centralité du foncier dans le régime d’accumulation du capital en Chine]," Post-Print halshs-01556558, HAL.
    17. Jiang, Ronghao & Lin, George C.S., 2021. "Placing China’s land marketization: The state, market, and the changing geography of land use in Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Yanpeng Jiang & Paul Waley, 2020. "Who Builds Cities in China? How Urban Investment and Development Companies Have Transformed Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 636-651, July.
    19. Hongbo Wang & Dan Rickman, 2020. "Housing Price and Population Growth across China: The Role of Housing Supply," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(3), pages 203-228, May.
    20. Jie Shen & Yang Xiao, 2020. "Emerging divided cities in China: Socioeconomic segregation in Shanghai, 2000–2010," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1338-1356, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:115:y:2024:i:1:p:112-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.