IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2627-d228921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of Socio-Spatial Differentiation from Soaring Housing Prices: A Case Study in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Chunhui Liu

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    Institute of Regional Agricultural Research, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Weixuan Song

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

Launched in 1998, the market-oriented reform of urban housing has given urban housing the dual attributes of residence and investment, and led to the rapid growth of housing prices as well as the intensification of its spatial differentiation within cities. However, the spatial patterns of the differentiation and its mechanism as well as socio-spatial effects are rarely touched. This paper studies 3963 urban residential districts in central Nanjing and explores the socio-spatial differentiation pattern and process of the urban housing prices and its growth in Nanjing based on the sample data of housing transactions over 30 quarters during the period of 2009–2017. The paper concludes that, by splitting the research duration into phases of six quarters each, the average housing prices in Nanjing alternates between “rapid growth” and “relatively stable” phases. At the same time, this paper finds that the spatial heterogeneity of housing prices in the city has been enhanced constantly, and the price gap in different types of residential housing has been clearly widened. In combination with the price level, location characteristics and architectural attributes of residential districts, this paper has categorized housing in Nanjing into nine typical types in a comprehensive manner. Based on the differences in their spatial attributes such as location, comfort and scarcity etc., different types of residences exhibit different pricing and price-to-rent ratio growth models. Based on those findings, we discussed the mechanism of the socio-spatial differentiation of housing prices in Nanjing from the housing reform and strategies of urban renewal and expansion. Beyond that, we discussed the role of urban housing consumption in the process of (re)production of urban classes, and its negative effects on urban young people, rural immigrants and other disadvantaged families. At the end of the paper, the policy suggestion about the supply-side reform of the housing market to promote socio-spatial equity and sustainable development is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song, 2019. "Perspectives of Socio-Spatial Differentiation from Soaring Housing Prices: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2627-:d:228921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moffitt, Robert, 1992. "Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-61, March.
    2. Feng, Qu & Wu, Guiying Laura, 2015. "Bubble or riddle? An asset-pricing approach evaluation on China's housing market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 376-383.
    3. Karolien De Bruyne & Jan Van Hove, 2013. "Explaining the spatial variation in housing prices: an economic geography approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(13), pages 1673-1689, May.
    4. Ya Ping Wang & Alan Murie, 2000. "Social and Spatial Implications of Housing Reform in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 397-417, June.
    5. Smyth, Stewart, 2012. "Contesting public accountability: A dialogical exploration of accountability and social housing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 230-243.
    6. Nicole Gurran & Kristian Ruming, 2016. "Less planning, more development? Housing and urban reform discourses in Australia," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 262-280, July.
    7. Fulong Wu, 2015. "Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 6-26, January.
    8. You-Ren Yang & Chih-hui Chang, 2007. "An Urban Regeneration Regime in China: A Case Study of Urban Redevelopment in Shanghai's Taipingqiao Area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1809-1826, August.
    9. Willem R. Boterman & Wouter P.C. Gent, 2014. "Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 140-160, April.
    10. Meese Richard & Wallace Nancy, 1994. "Testing the Present Value Relation for Housing Prices: Should I Leave My House in San Francisco?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 245-266, May.
    11. Anita Blessing, 2016. "Repackaging the poor? Conceptualising neoliberal reforms of social rental housing," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 149-172, March.
    12. Henrik Gutzon Larsen & Anders Lund Hansen, 2008. "Gentrification—Gentle or Traumatic? Urban Renewal Policies and Socioeconomic Transformations in Copenhagen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2429-2448, November.
    13. Qiyan Wu & Tim Edensor & Jianquan Cheng, 2018. "Beyond Space: Spatial (Re)Production and Middle†Class Remaking Driven by Jiaoyufication in Nanjing City, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. William Alonso, 1960. "A Theory Of The Urban Land Market," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 149-157, January.
    15. Shen, Ling, 2012. "Are house prices too high in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1206-1210.
    16. Nicole Gurran & Kristian Ruming, 2016. "Less planning, more development? Housing and urban reform discourses in Australia," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 262-280, July.
    17. Chengdong Yi & Youqin Huang, 2014. "Housing Consumption and Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities During the First Decade of the Twenty-First Century," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 291-311, March.
    18. Tim Butler & Garry Robson, 2001. "Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbourhood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(12), pages 2145-2162, November.
    19. Fulong Wu, 2015. "Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 6-26, January.
    20. Qianwei Ying & Danglun Luo & Jie Chen, 2013. "The Determinants of Homeownership Affordability among the ‘Sandwich Class’: Empirical Findings from Guangzhou, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1870-1888, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siqi Yu & Xigang Zhu & Qian He, 2020. "An Assessment of Urban Park Access Using House-Level Data in Urban China: Through the Lens of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Yi Chen & Zhicong Ye & Hui Liu & Ruishan Chen & Zhenhuan Liu & Hui Liu, 2021. "A GIS-Based Approach for Flood Risk Zoning by Combining Social Vulnerability and Flood Susceptibility: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Haijin Wu & Guofang Zhai & Wei Chen, 2020. "Combined Rental and Transportation Affordability under China’s Public Rental Housing System—A Case Study of Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Qinyu Cui & Yiting Huang & Guang Yang & Yu Chen, 2022. "Measuring Green Exposure Levels in Communities of Different Economic Levels at Different Completion Periods: Through the Lens of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Shen & Yang Xiao, 2020. "Emerging divided cities in China: Socioeconomic segregation in Shanghai, 2000–2010," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1338-1356, May.
    2. Hongbo Wang & Dan Rickman, 2020. "Housing Price and Population Growth across China: The Role of Housing Supply," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(3), pages 203-228, May.
    3. Wei Hu & Shanggang Yin & Haibo Gong, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution Patterns and Influencing Factors of China’s Urban Housing Price-to-Income Ratio," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Baltagi, Badi H. & Li, Jing, 2015. "Cointegration of matched home purchases and rental price indexes — Evidence from Singapore," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 80-88.
    5. Xu Zhang & Xiaoxing Liu & Jianqin Hang & Dengbao Yao & Guangping Shi, 2016. "Do Urban Rail Transit Facilities Affect Housing Prices? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Mengzhu Zhang & Si Qiao & Xiang Yan, 2021. "The secondary circuit of capital and the making of the suburban property boom in postcrisis Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1331-1355, September.
    7. Sidong Zhao & Kaixu Zhao & Ping Zhang, 2021. "Spatial Inequality in China’s Housing Market and the Driving Mechanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-33, August.
    8. Natacha Aveline-Dubach & Guillaume Blandeau, 2019. "The political economy of transit value capture: The changing business model of the MTRC in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3415-3431, December.
    9. Manuel B. Aalbers, 2017. "The Variegated Financialization of Housing," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 542-554, July.
    10. Isil Erol, 2019. "New Geographies of Residential Capitalism: Financialization of the Turkish Housing Market Since the Early 2000s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 724-740, July.
    11. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2017. "Centrality of Land in the Capital Accumulation Regime in China [La centralité du foncier dans le régime d’accumulation du capital en Chine]," Post-Print halshs-01556558, HAL.
    12. Rickman, Dan S. & Wang, Hongbo, 2016. "Regional Housing Supply Elasticity in China 1999-2013: A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis," MPRA Paper 69157, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Natacha Aveline-Dubach & Guillaume Blandeau, 2019. "The political economy of transit value capture: The changing business model of the MTRC in Hong Kong [L'économie politique de la captation de valeur foncière (Land value capture): le nouveau modèle," Post-Print halshs-02100616, HAL.
    14. Wu, Fulong, 2022. "Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Siqi Yu & Xigang Zhu & Qian He, 2020. "An Assessment of Urban Park Access Using House-Level Data in Urban China: Through the Lens of Social Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Le Tang & Fengqin Zhou & Xueliang Feng & Yali Luo, 2018. "Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Jessica Ferm & Ben Clifford & Patricia Canelas & Nicola Livingstone, 2021. "Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: The case of permitted development in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2040-2058, August.
    18. Milo Costanza-van den Belt & Tayanah O’Donnell & Robert Webb & Eleanor Robson & Robert Costanza & Jiaqian Ling & Sarah Crowe & Hao Han, 2021. "Community Preferences for Urban Systems Transformation in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    19. I-Chun Tsai & Shu-Hen Chiang, 2018. "Risk Transfer among Housing Markets in Major Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Jiang, Ronghao & Lin, George C.S., 2021. "Placing China’s land marketization: The state, market, and the changing geography of land use in Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2627-:d:228921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.