IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v41y2024i3p413-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind the (identification) gap: Foci in multiteam systems and their impact on innovative work behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Eduard Cremers
  • Petru Lucian Curșeu

Abstract

The paper presents a longitudinal exploration of identification with teams and multiteam systems (MTSs) in an organizational context that started using MTSs. Data were collected in five waves during the first 2 years in which the organization started the implementation of MTSs in order to aggregate teams in value streams as organizational units. The results show that there is a clear and distinct gap between team and MTS identification. This gap is greater in larger MTSs than smaller MTSs. This gap decreases in time mostly due to a rise in MTS identification in combination with a stable team identification across time. Additionally, our research showed that MTS identification is hindered when negative relations are present in the MTS. Finally, we show that identification with the team fosters innovative team performance and the identification with MTS moderates this positive association in a compensatory manner. The findings show important implications for the management of MTSs in modern organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Eduard Cremers & Petru Lucian Curșeu, 2024. "Mind the (identification) gap: Foci in multiteam systems and their impact on innovative work behaviours," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 413-427, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:3:p:413-427
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2978
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teppo Felin & Steve W. J. Kozlowski & Georgia T. Chao, 2012. "The Dynamics of Emergence: Cognition and Cohesion in Work Teams," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5-6), pages 335-354, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiunyan Wu & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2020. "A multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict and decision making: application of agent-based modeling," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. H. Emre Yildiz & Adis Murtic & Udo Zander & Anders Richtnér, 2019. "What Fosters Individual-Level Absorptive Capacity in MNCs? An Extended Motivation–Ability–Opportunity Framework," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 93-129, February.
    3. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Taggar, Simon & Domurath, Anne & Coviello, Nicole, 2024. "Peer effects on passion levels, passion trajectories, and outcomes for individuals and teams," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4).
    5. Rust, Roland T. & Moorman, Christine & van Beuningen, Jacqueline, 2016. "Quality mental model convergence and business performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 155-171.
    6. Mulder, Joris & Leenders, Roger Th.A.J., 2019. "Modeling the evolution of interaction behavior in social networks: A dynamic relational event approach for real-time analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 73-85.
    7. Teppo Felin & Teppo Felin, 2012. "Cosmologies of Capability, Markets and Wisdom of Crowds: Introduction and Comparative Agenda," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5-6), pages 283-294, July.
    8. Petru Lucian Curşeu & Oleh Krehel & Joep H M Evers & Adrian Muntean, 2014. "Cognitive Distance, Absorptive Capacity and Group Rationality: A Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-6, October.
    9. Glikson, Ella & Erez, Miriam, 2020. "The emergence of a communication climate in global virtual teams," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    10. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Gumusluoglu, Lale & Erturk, Alper & Scandura, Terri A., 2023. "What if authoritarian to all or to some? A multi-level investigation of within-team differentiation in authoritarian leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Melanie Feeney & Therese Grohnert & Wim Gijselaers & Pim Martens, 2023. "Organizations, Learning, and Sustainability: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 217-235, April.
    12. Grudniewicz, Agnes & Tenbensel, Tim & Evans, Jenna M. & Steele Gray, Carolyn & Baker, G. Ross & Wodchis, Walter P., 2018. "‘Complexity-compatible’ policy for integrated care? Lessons from the implementation of Ontario's Health Links," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 95-102.
    13. Mom, T.J.M., 2019. "Strategic Growth and Implementation: Thriving in a Disruptive Landscape," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA 2019-076-S&E, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:3:p:413-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.