IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v40y2023i1p194-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systems view of responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A causal loop model for Taiwan's approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chih‐Tung Hsiao
  • Chun‐Cheng Chen
  • Lee‐Kai Lin
  • Chung‐Shu Liu

Abstract

Since the worldwide outbreak of the COVID‐19 pandemic in December 2019, Taiwan has successfully stopped the spread of COVID‐19. The policies and works of the epidemic control are a complex and dynamic process. This study applied the methodology of system dynamics to explore the structure of the COVID‐19 epidemic control system in Taiwan and analysed its system behaviours. The results show that the system is composed of key subsystems, such as national health insurance and quarantine, combined with government policies. Joint efforts among the central and local governments and the general public have been made to strengthen the quarantine of border entrants, encourage the public to wear masks and employ technology for contact tracing and tracking down those being tested positive with COVID‐19. Together with the efficient increase in the capacity of testing and medical treatments, these measures can effectively reach a balance between epidemic control and economic activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih‐Tung Hsiao & Chun‐Cheng Chen & Lee‐Kai Lin & Chung‐Shu Liu, 2023. "A systems view of responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic: A causal loop model for Taiwan's approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 194-206, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:194-206
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H J Wong & D Morra & R C Wu & M Caesar & H Abrams, 2012. "Using system dynamics principles for conceptual modelling of publicly funded hospitals," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(1), pages 79-88, January.
    2. Hyojung Kang & Harriet Black Nembhard & Nasrollah Ghahramani & William Curry, 2018. "A system dynamics approach to planning and evaluating interventions for chronic disease management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(7), pages 987-1005, July.
    3. Hui-Ling Peng & Chih-Tung Hsiao & Ming-Hung Yao, 2016. "Systemic Analysis of Pensions: The Case of the Taiwanese Primary School Teacher Pension Fund," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 159-172, January.
    4. Sarah Kok & Alexander Rutherford & Reka Gustafson & Rolando Barrios & Julio Montaner & Krisztina Vasarhelyi, 2015. "Optimizing an HIV testing program using a system dynamics model of the continuum of care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 334-362, September.
    5. Eren Demir & Reda Lebcir & Shola Adeyemi, 2014. "Modelling length of stay and patient flows: methodological case studies from the UK neonatal care services," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(4), pages 532-545, April.
    6. D C Lane & C Monefeldt & J V Rosenhead, 2000. "Looking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: A system dynamics study of an accident and emergency department," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(5), pages 518-531, May.
    7. Radboud J. Duintjer Tebbens & Kimberly M. Thompson, 2009. "Priority Shifting and the Dynamics of Managing Eradicable Infectious Diseases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 650-663, April.
    8. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    2. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Mohammad Reza Davahli & Waldemar Karwowski & Redha Taiar, 2020. "A System Dynamics Simulation Applied to Healthcare: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Edward G. Anderson & David R. Keith & Jose Lopez, 2023. "Opportunities for system dynamics research in operations management for public policy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1895-1920, June.
    5. A. Sardi & E. Sorano, 2021. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Papers 2102.04090, arXiv.org.
    6. Orkun İrsoy & Şanser Güz & Naz Beril Akan & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Dynamic trade‐offs in granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) administration during chemotherapy," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(4), pages 397-446, October.
    7. Reda Lebcir & Rifat Atun, 2021. "Resources management impact on neonatal services performance in the United Kingdom: A system dynamics modelling approach," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 793-812, May.
    8. Nidhee Jadeja & Nina J Zhu & Reda M Lebcir & Franco Sassi & Alison Holmes & Raheelah Ahmad, 2022. "Using system dynamics modelling to assess the economic efficiency of innovations in the public sector - a systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Özge Karanfil & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh & Jim Duggan, 2020. "System dynamics and bio‐medical modeling," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(4), pages 389-396, October.
    10. Linus Nyiwul, 2021. "Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(2), pages 283-305, December.
    11. David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas & Lambertus P. J. Nistelrooij & Etiënne A.J.A. Rouwette & Ilse M. Verstijnen & Jac A.M. Vennix, 2015. "The Eye of the Beholder: A Case Example of Changing Clients' Perspectives Through Involvement in the Model Validation Process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 437-449, July.
    12. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    13. Yuta Kanai & Hideaki Takagi, 2021. "Markov chain analysis for the neonatal inpatient flow in a hospital," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 92-116, March.
    14. Claire F. Brereton & Paul Jagals, 2021. "Applications of Systems Science to Understand and Manage Multiple Influences within Children’s Environmental Health in Least Developed Countries: A Causal Loop Diagram Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Saba Pourreza & Misagh Faezipour & Miad Faezipour, 2022. "Eye-SCOR: A Supply Chain Operations Reference-Based Framework for Smart Eye Status Monitoring Using System Dynamics Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jan Schoenfelder & Jens O. Brunner, 2018. "Operations research in intensive care unit management: a literature review," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, March.
    17. David C. Lane & Jim Duggan, 2020. "Addressing public health and security challenges with system dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 867-874, November.
    18. S Vanderby & M W Carter, 2010. "An evaluation of the applicability of system dynamics to patient flow modelling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(11), pages 1572-1581, November.
    19. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Richard C. Larson, 2018. "SD meets OR: a new synergy to address policy problems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 327-353, January.
    20. Radboud J. Duintjer Tebbens & Kimberly M. Thompson, 2019. "Evaluation of Proactive and Reactive Strategies for Polio Eradication Activities in Pakistan and Afghanistan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 389-401, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:194-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.