IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v35y2018i3p282-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Systems Perspective of National Innovation Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliani Suseno
  • Craig Standing

Abstract

In this paper, we argue for a systems perspective as the theoretical and analytical basis of national innovation ecosystems. Drawing on the system concepts of holism, emergence and open systems features, we analyse the national innovation ecosystems of Australia and Singapore. The analysis of national innovation ecosystems is based on five dimensions of policies: human capital investment and the availability of professional labour, infrastructure, private–public sector collaboration, support for funding and commercialization and innovation corporate culture. We find both countries' national innovation ecosystems to have aspects of holism, emergence and being open systems; however, the extent of these features varies between the two countries in terms of the five dimensions of national innovation policies that we focus on. The paper provides implications for theory and practice particularly for policymakers to consider systems perspective in order to properly design and also gain benefits from national innovation ecosystems. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliani Suseno & Craig Standing, 2018. "The Systems Perspective of National Innovation Ecosystems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 282-307, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:282-307
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2494
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dashi Nazarov & Anton Klarin, 2020. "Taxonomy of Industry 4.0 research: Mapping scholarship and industry insights," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 535-556, July.
    2. Xianke Li & Chongyan Li, 2024. "Interaction Effect of Export Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and Technological Independent Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Jen Nelles & Kevin Walsh & Michalis Papazoglou, 2022. "FECs, innovation, and skills: A literature review," Insight Papers 012, The Productivity Institute.
    4. Pham, Hien Thu & Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Yu, Ming-Miin & McLennan, Char-lee J., 2024. "Dynamic efficiency of Australia's innovation systems: A regional and state analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Rohit Bhardwaj & Saurabh Srivastava & Sunali Bindra & Sumit Sangwan, 2023. "An ecosystem view of social entrepreneurship through the perspective of systems thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 250-265, January.
    6. Ahmad Alaassar & Anne-Laure Mention & Tor Helge Aas, 2022. "Ecosystem dynamics: exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 2157-2182, April.
    7. Matilde Reséndiz-Castro & Rosalba Zepeda-Bautista & Ignacio Enrique Peón-Escalante, 2022. "Transdisciplinary Cyber-systemic Design of Instruments to Measure Academic Performance in Middle and Higher Education Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-440, June.
    8. Alänge, Sverker & Steiber, Annika & Corvello, Vincenzo, 2022. "Evaluating corporate-startup collaboration: A government perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Anton Klarin & Rifat Sharmelly & Yuliani Suseno, 2021. "A Systems Perspective in Examining Industry Clusters: Case Studies of Clusters in Russia and India," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:282-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.