IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v33y2016i5p651-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Practice of Systemic Change — Acknowledging Social Complexity in Project Management

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Klein

Abstract

The Anthropocene calls for systemic change which requires much more than good ideas, stakeholder activism and self‐organization. Successful change is managed in the form of a project. However, project management itself needs to learn to cope with the systemic complexity of the real world, especially with social complexity. Hence, this paper explores the paradox of reintroducing complexity within a discipline that has professionalized the reduction of complexity. Acknowledging the inevitability of the social aspects in human activity systems, this paper suggests decomposing social complexity along a political and a cultural perspective. This has methodological implications and practical consequences. First, the political stakeholder analysis is enriched with a systemic and ecological view. Second, cultures are interpreted along the lines of meaning‐creation and sensemaking, exploring the stories which are the world to us. Thus, navigating systemic change finally embarks on the concept of next practice, promoting a path forward, step by step. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Klein, 2016. "Towards a Practice of Systemic Change — Acknowledging Social Complexity in Project Management," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 651-661, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:33:y:2016:i:5:p:651-661
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2428
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C Chapman & S Ward, 2003. "Constructively simple estimating: a project management example," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(10), pages 1050-1058, October.
    2. Mahmoud Ezzamel & Hugh Willmott & Frank Worthington, 2001. "Power, Control and Resistance in ‘The Factory That Time Forgot’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1053-1079, December.
    3. Louis Klein, 2013. "Notes on an Ecology of Paradigms," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 773-779, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catalina García & José Pérez & Salvador Rambaud, 2010. "Proposal of a new distribution in PERT methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 515-538, December.
    2. Bénédicte Vidaillet & Grégory Gamot, 2015. "Working and resisting when one's workplace is under threat of being shut down: A Lacanian perspective," Post-Print hal-01123563, HAL.
    3. Iordanis Eleftheriadis & Vasilios Vyttas, 2016. "Creating a culture of risk in the Greek public administration. A brief retrospect on the memorandum era," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 9(2), pages 65-71, June.
    4. Paul S. Adler, 2012. "PERSPECTIVE—The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 244-266, February.
    5. Papi, Luca & Bigoni, Michele & Deidda Gagliardo, Enrico & Funnell, Warwick, 2019. "Accounting for power and resistance: The University of Ferrara under the Fascist regime in Italy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 59-76.
    6. Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar & Fahreen Alamgir, 2018. "Ethics of Resistance in Organisations: A Conceptual Proposal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-43, April.
    7. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Azzone, Giovanni, 2010. "The organizational dynamics of Enterprise Risk Management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 659-675, October.
    8. Jesus Palomo & David Rios Insua & Fabrizio Ruggeri, 2007. "Modeling External Risks in Project Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 961-978, August.
    9. Robin Burrow & Rebecca Scott & David Courpasson, 2022. "Where ‘The Rules Don’t Apply’: Organizational Isolation and Misbehaviour in Elite Kitchens," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1103-1131, July.
    10. Ezzamel, Mahmoud & Willmott, Hugh & Worthington, Frank, 2004. "Accounting and management-labour relations: the politics of production in the 'factory with a problem'," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 269-302.
    11. Thibaut Bardon & Stewart Clegg & Emmanuel Josserand, 2012. "Exploring identity construction from a critical management perspective: a research agenda," Post-Print hal-00949864, HAL.
    12. Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Christian Dyrlund, 2019. "The terms of “becoming empowered”: How ascriptions and negotiations of employee identities shape the outcomes of workplace voice activities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    13. McDaid, Emma & Andon, Paul & Free, Clinton, 2023. "Algorithmic management and the politics of demand: Control and resistance at Uber," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Linda Glover & Mike Noon, 2005. "Shop-floor workers’ responses to quality management initiatives," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(4), pages 727-745, December.
    15. Kamla, Rania, 2019. "Religion-based resistance strategies, politics of authenticity and professional women accountants," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 52-69.
    16. Eero Vaara & Janne Tienari & Rebecca Piekkari & Risto Säntti, 2005. "Language and the Circuits of Power in a Merging Multinational Corporation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 595-623, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:33:y:2016:i:5:p:651-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.