IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i2p374-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participant‐driven salient beliefs regarding abortion: Implications for abortion attitude measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Kristen N. Jozkowski
  • Xiana Bueno
  • Kathryn LaRoche
  • Brandon L. Crawford
  • Ronna C. Turner
  • Wen‐Juo Lo

Abstract

Objective Guided by the Reasoned Action Approach, we used a salient belief elicitation (SBE) to elicit participant‐generated beliefs regarding abortion. SBE is a formative research technique used to elicit people's control (i.e., perceived facilitators and barriers associated with a behavior), behavioral (i.e., perceived positive and negative consequences of doing a behavior), and normative (i.e., influence of important people/peers regarding a behavior) beliefs regarding a particular behavior (i.e., abortion). Methods We administered our SBE to English‐ and Spanish‐speaking U.S. adults (N = 608) from NORC's AmeriSpeak® panel. We used inductive content and thematic analyses to assess open‐ended questions. Results We found that participants’ control and behavioral beliefs referenced circumstances used to assess abortion attitudes in polling item (e.g., rape) and reasons people seek abortion (e.g., financial reasons) as well as potential negative emotions (e.g., shame) and positive consequences (e.g., autonomy) associated with abortion. Participants indicated pregnant people's partners and people seeking abortion as salient referents. Conclusion Participants mentioned several contexts reflected in common measures used to assess abortion attitudes by national polls and surveys. However, we also found other relevant circumstances not reflected in common measures and a range of salient referents. We recommend abortion attitudes measures account for these participant‐driven salient beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristen N. Jozkowski & Xiana Bueno & Kathryn LaRoche & Brandon L. Crawford & Ronna C. Turner & Wen‐Juo Lo, 2024. "Participant‐driven salient beliefs regarding abortion: Implications for abortion attitude measurement," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(2), pages 374-391, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:374-391
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13343
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel K Jones & Jenna Jerman, 2017. "Characteristics and Circumstances of U.S. Women Who Obtain Very Early and Second-Trimester Abortions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Chung Gun Lee & Susan E. Middlestadt & Seiyeong Park & Junhye Kwon & Kyoungmin Noh & Dong-il Seo & Wook Song & Jung-jun Park & Han-joon Lee & Hyun Joo Kang & Yeon Soon Ahn, 2020. "Predicting Voluntary Exercise Training among Korean Firefighters: Using Elicitation Study and the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Martin Fishbein, 2008. "A Reasoned Action Approach to Health Promotion," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 834-844, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marilyn Stringer & Tali Averbuch & Pamela Mack Brooks & Loretta Sweet Jemmott, 2012. "Response to Homeless Childbearing Women’s Health Care Learning Needs," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 195-212, May.
    2. Scherr, Sebastian & Reifegerste, Doreen & Arendt, Florian & van Weert, Julia C.M. & Alden, Dana L., 2022. "Family involvement in medical decision making in Europe and the United States: A replication and extension in five Countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Paquin, Ryan S. & Peay, Holly L. & Gehtland, Lisa M. & Lewis, Megan A. & Bailey, Donald B., 2016. "Parental intentions to enroll children in a voluntary expanded newborn screening program," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-24.
    4. Wagner, Brandon G. & Cleland, Kelly & Batur, Pelin & Wu, Justine & Rothberg, Michael B., 2019. "Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Norman C. H. Wong & Eryn Bostwick, 2017. "#WhyITold: A Pilot Test of Twitter Messages Aimed at Promoting Bystander Intervention against Domestic Violence," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 166-175, December.
    6. Abhirat Supthanasup & Cathy Banwell & Matthew Kelly, 2022. "Facebook Feeds and Child Feeding: A Qualitative Study of Thai Mothers in Online Child Feeding Support Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Asare, Eris & Nakakeeto, Gertrude & Segarra, Eduardo, 2018. "Determinants of the choice of a savings option: "The case of African Households"," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266868, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Bonnie Spring, 2008. "Health Decision Making: Lynchpin of Evidence-Based Practice," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 866-874, November.
    9. Yu-Ting Chen & Fei-Hsiu Hsiao & Nae-Fang Miao & Ping-Ling Chen, 2013. "Factors Associated with Parents’ Perceptions of Parental Smoking in the Presence of Children and Its Consequences on Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Jenny A. Higgins & Madison Lands & Taryn M. Valley & Emma Carpenter & Laura Jacques, 2021. "Real-Time Effects of Payer Restrictions on Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Cost-Related Barriers and Their Consequences among U.S. Abortion Seekers on Reddit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, August.
    11. Lagerkvist, C.J. & Edenbrandt, A.K. & Tibbelin, I. & Wahlstedt, Y., 2020. "Preferences for sustainable and responsible equity funds - A choice experiment with Swedish private investors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    12. Samal Kaliyeva & Francisco Jose Areal & Yiorgos Gadanakis, 2020. "Attitudes of Kazakh Rural Households towards Joining and Creating Cooperatives," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Lairson, David R. & Huo, Jinhai & Ball Ricks, Katharine A. & Savas, Lara & Fernández, María E., 2013. "The cost of implementing a 2-1-1 call center-based cancer control navigator program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 51-56.
    14. Amanda J. Dillard & Mick P. Couper & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2010. "Perceived Risk of Cancer and Patient Reports of Participation in Decisions about Screening: The DECISIONS Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 96-105, September.
    15. Myeongseob Lim & Kyoung Sook Jeong & Sung-Soo Oh & Sang-Baek Koh & Sei-Jin Chang & Yeon-Soon Ahn, 2020. "Effects of Occupational and Leisure-Time Physical Activities on Insomnia in Korean Firefighters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Featherman, Mauricio & Jia, Shizhen (Jasper) & Califf, Christopher B. & Hajli, Nick, 2021. "The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Dench, Daniel & Pineda-Torres, Mayra & Myers, Caitlin, 2024. "The effects of post-Dobbs abortion bans on fertility," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Mohammad Alipour & Rodney A. Stewart & Oz Sahin, 2021. "Beyond the Diffusion of Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems at Scale: Allegorising the Battery Energy Storage Adoption Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Lucy R Van Otterloo & Cynthia D Connelly, 2016. "Maternal risk during pregnancy: a concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2393-2401, September.
    20. Quynh Anh Nguyen & Luc Hens & Charlotte MacAlister & Lester Johnson & Boripat Lebel & Sinh Bach Tan & Hung Manh Nguyen & The Ninh Nguyen & Louis Lebel, 2018. "Theory of Reasoned Action as a Framework for Communicating Climate Risk: A Case Study of Schoolchildren in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:374-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.