IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i4p975-991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Populist media diets

Author

Listed:
  • Eline A. de Rooij
  • Dominik A. Stecuła
  • Mark A. Pickup

Abstract

Objective The changing media landscape highlights the need to understand the dynamic nature of Americans’ news consumption patterns. Research to date has focused on understanding how media diets vary across partisanship, while other, cross‐cutting cleavages remain underexplored. We focus on the relationship between populism and where Americans get their news and how they assess news media credibility. Methods Using an original, national survey of Americans (N = 1009) fielded in March 2020, we explore the news media diets of populists, controlling for partisanship, ideology, and relevant covariates. Results Analyses demonstrate that two primary dimensions of populism—anti‐elitism and distrust of experts—relate to media diets in complex ways. Conclusion Those who distrust experts have a more ideologically extreme media diet and put trust in fringe outlets and social media, whereas those with anti‐elite attitudes do not shy away from mainstream outlets and hold positive views of journalists and mainstream media.

Suggested Citation

  • Eline A. de Rooij & Dominik A. Stecuła & Mark A. Pickup, 2022. "Populist media diets," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(4), pages 975-991, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:4:p:975-991
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Roccato & Piergiorgio Corbetta & Nicoletta Cavazza & Pasquale Colloca, 2019. "Assessment of Citizens’ Populist Orientations: Development and Validation of the POPulist ORientation (POPOR) Scale," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(6), pages 2148-2167, October.
    2. James J. Fahey, 2021. "Building Populist Discourse: An Analysis of Populist Communication in American Presidential Elections, 1896–2016," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1268-1288, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Soares & Carla Malafaia & Pedro D. Ferreira, 2024. "Which Dimensions Are Related to Populist Attitudes: An Educational View Based on a Systematic Literature Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele Roccato & Nicoletta Cavazza & Pasquale Colloca & Silvia Russo, 2020. "Three Roads to Populism? An Italian Field Study on the 2019 European Election," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1222-1235, July.
    2. Bart Bonikowski & Yuchen Luo & Oscar Stuhler, 2022. "Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and Authoritarianism in U.S. Presidential Campaigns (1952–2020) with Neural Language Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(4), pages 1721-1787, November.
    3. Michele Roccato & Nicoletta Cavazza & Pasquale Colloca & Silvia Russo, 2020. "A Democratic Emergency After a Health Emergency? Exposure to COVID‐19, Perceived Economic Threat and Support for Anti‐Democratic Political Systems," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2193-2202, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:4:p:975-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.