IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v51y2004i3p443-449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re‐Estimating Female Domestic Work: Based On The British Survey Evidence From 1986–7

Author

Listed:
  • Pròdromos‐Ioànnis Prodromídis

Abstract

Jenkins and O'Leary (SJPE, 1997) estimated unpaid work using some of the variables collected in the 1986–7 SCEL Initiative. However, the discovery of low filial effects should be attributed to the specification of their model, especially to the inclusion of proxies for contemporaneous paid work aiming to capture population heterogeneity. It seems that the two researchers could have utilised other data from people's past work histories (which were also solicited in the survey) to construct alternative paid‐work proxies and avoid the simultaneity problem altogether. The introduction of such proxies preserves the structure of the Jenkins/O'Leary model, and yields both lower full‐time and part‐time employment effects on unpaid work, and higher children‐effects. In fact the children‐effects remain pronounced even if one drops all paid work regressors or introduces a non‐selection hazard from the probit on paid work participation, instead.

Suggested Citation

  • Pròdromos‐Ioànnis Prodromídis, 2004. "Re‐Estimating Female Domestic Work: Based On The British Survey Evidence From 1986–7," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(3), pages 443-449, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:51:y:2004:i:3:p:443-449
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00314.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00314.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00314.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gronau, Reuben, 1977. "Leisure, Home Production, and Work-The Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(6), pages 1099-1123, December.
    2. Stephen P. Jenkins & Nigel C. O’Leary, 1997. "Gender Differentials in Domestic Work, Market Work, and Total Work Time: UK Time Budget Survey Evidence for 1974/5 and 1987," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 44(2), pages 153-164, May.
    3. Jenkins, Stephen P & O'Leary, Nigel C, 1995. "Modelling Domestic Work Time," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 265-279, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul W. Miller & Anh T. Le, 2012. "The Impact of Age of Children on Decision Making Over Time Use in Couple Families," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 15(2), pages 77-100.
    2. Pagán, Ricardo, 2013. "Time allocation of disabled individuals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 80-93.
    3. Jonathan Gershuny & John Robinson, 1988. "Historical changes in the household division of labor," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(4), pages 537-552, November.
    4. Ahn T. Le, 2003. "Female Labour Market Participation: Differences Between Primary and Tied Movers," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 03-17, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    5. Almeida, Alexandre N. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2019. "Agricultural productivity, shadow wages and off-farm labor decisions in Nicaragua," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 99-110.
    6. François Gardes, 2021. "Endogenous Prices in a Riemannian Geometry Framework," Post-Print halshs-03325414, HAL.
    7. Rania Gihleb & Osnat Lifshitz, 2022. "Dynamic Effects of Educational Assortative Mating on Labor Supply," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 46, pages 302-327, October.
    8. Dipankar Purkayastha, 1999. "Patriarchal Monopoly and Economic Development," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 61-78.
    9. Billari, Francesco C. & Giuntella, Osea & Stella, Luca, 2018. "Broadband internet, digital temptations, and sleep," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 58-76.
    10. Huffman, Wallace, 2004. "Marketizing U.S. Production in the Post-War Era: Implications for Estimating CPI Bias and Real Income from a Complete-Household-Demand System," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11987, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Dagmar Brožová, 2010. "Individual Labour Supply Decisions with Respect To Household Production and Over the Life Cycle [Rozhodování o individuální nabídce práce s ohledem na produkci domácnosti a v průběhu životního cykl," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(1), pages 21-33.
    12. James J. Heckman, 2015. "Introduction to A Theory of the Allocation of Time by Gary Becker," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(583), pages 403-409, March.
    13. Olivier Donni & Eleonora Matteazzi, 2012. "On the Importance of Household Production in Collective Models: Evidence from U.S. Data," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 105-106, pages 99-125.
    14. Catherine Sofer & Claire Thibout, 2019. "Women’s investment in career and the household division of labour," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(60), pages 6535-6557, December.
    15. Rosen, Harvey S, 1980. "What Is Labor Supply and Do Taxes Affect It?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(2), pages 171-176, May.
    16. Matveenko Vladimir & Saveliev Peter, 2005. "Labor Supply in Russia: Studying the Role of Outside Options of the Employed," EERC Working Paper Series 00-215e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    17. Yoo-Mi Chin, 2008. "A household production model of demand for childcare and meals: theory and evidence from the Philippines," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 47-64, March.
    18. R.Ramya, 2019. "Care Work and Time Use: A Focus on Child Care, Personal Care and Elderly Care Time," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 34-41, March.
    19. Koulovatianos, Christos & Schröder, Carsten & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2005. "Non-market time and household well-being," Discussion Papers 2005/11, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    20. Bloemen, Hans & Stancanelli, Elena G. F., 2008. "How Do Parents Allocate Time? The Effects of Wages and Income," IZA Discussion Papers 3679, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:51:y:2004:i:3:p:443-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.