IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v49y2022i4p1842-1859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equivalence theorems for c and DA‐optimality for linear mixed effects models with applications to multitreatment group assignments in health care

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Liu
  • Rong‐Xian Yue
  • Weng Kee Wong

Abstract

We construct c and DA‐optimal approximate designs for linear mixed models with group‐specific treatment for estimating parameters or contrasts in the population parameters. We establish equivalence theorems to confirm optimality of these designs under a linear mixed model and provide illustrative application to find D, DA and c‐optimal designs for polynomial and fractional polynomial models with multitreatment group assignments. For more complex models, we briefly review metaheuristics and their potential applications to find various optimal designs, including optimal designs for problems considered here and their extensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Liu & Rong‐Xian Yue & Weng Kee Wong, 2022. "Equivalence theorems for c and DA‐optimality for linear mixed effects models with applications to multitreatment group assignments in health care," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1842-1859, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:1842-1859
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12584
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12584?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Lei & He, Daojiang, 2020. "R-optimal designs for individual prediction in random coefficient regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Maryna Prus, 2019. "Optimal designs for minimax-criteria in random coefficient regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 465-478, April.
    3. Masoudi, Ehsan & Holling, Heinz & Wong, Weng Kee, 2017. "Application of imperialist competitive algorithm to find minimax and standardized maximin optimal designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 330-345.
    4. Maryna Prus & Rainer Schwabe, 2016. "Optimal designs for the prediction of individual parameters in hierarchical models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(1), pages 175-191, January.
    5. Patrick Royston & Douglas G. Altman, 1994. "Regression Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimonious Parametric Modelling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(3), pages 429-453, September.
    6. Prus, Maryna, 2019. "Various optimality criteria for the prediction of individual response curves," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 36-41.
    7. Timothy T Ushijima & William W G Yeh & Weng Kee Wong, 2021. "Constructing robust and efficient experimental designs in groundwater modeling using a Galerkin method, proper orthogonal decomposition, and metaheuristic algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Thomas Schmelter, 2007. "The Optimality of Single-group Designs for Certain Mixed Models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 183-193, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xin & Ye, Min & Yue, Rong-Xian, 2021. "Optimal designs for comparing population curves in hierarchical models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. He, Lei & He, Daojiang, 2020. "R-optimal designs for individual prediction in random coefficient regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Lei He & Rong-Xian Yue, 2021. "D-optimal designs for hierarchical linear models with intraclass covariance structure," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1349-1361, June.
    4. Maryna Prus & Hans-Peter Piepho, 2021. "Optimizing the Allocation of Trials to Sub-regions in Multi-environment Crop Variety Testing," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 267-288, June.
    5. Liu, Xin & Yue, Rong-Xian & Chatterjee, Kashinath, 2020. "Geometric characterization of D-optimal designs for random coefficient regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Noémi Kreif & Richard Grieve & Iván Díaz & David Harrison, 2015. "Evaluation of the Effect of a Continuous Treatment: A Machine Learning Approach with an Application to Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1213-1228, September.
    7. Maryna Prus, 2019. "Optimal designs for minimax-criteria in random coefficient regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 465-478, April.
    8. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo, 2012. "Life Satisfaction, Household Income and Personality Traits," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 86, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    9. Christel Faes & Marc Aerts & Helena Geys & Geert Molenberghs, 2007. "Model Averaging Using Fractional Polynomials to Estimate a Safe Level of Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 111-123, February.
    10. Adrian Adermon & Mikael Lindahl & Daniel Waldenström, 2018. "Intergenerational Wealth Mobility and the Role of Inheritance: Evidence from Multiple Generations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 482-513, July.
    11. Jackson, Christopher, 2016. "flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i08).
    12. Hünermund, Paul & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2019. "Estimating the causal effect of R&D subsidies in a pan-European program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 115-124.
    13. Malloy, Elizabeth J. & Spiegelman, Donna & Eisen, Ellen A., 2009. "Comparing measures of model selection for penalized splines in Cox models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2605-2616, May.
    14. Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo, 2015. "Life satisfaction, income and personality," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 17-32.
    15. Marcelo Cajias & Philipp Freudenreich & Anna Heller & Wolfgang Schaefers, 2018. "Censored Quantile Regressions and the Determinants of Real Estate Liquidity," ERES eres2018_203, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    16. Zambrano-Monserrate, Manuel A., 2024. "Labor dynamics and unions: An empirical analysis through Okun's Law," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 613-628.
    17. Marisa Rifada & Vita Ratnasari & Purhadi Purhadi, 2023. "Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of The Bivariate Polynomial Ordinal Logistic Regression Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, January.
    18. Sanjoy Sinha, 2013. "Robust designs for multivariate logistic regression," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 71(2), pages 157-173, September.
    19. Pregaldini, Damiano & Backes-Gellner, Uschi & Eisenkopf, Gerald, 2020. "Girls’ preferences for STEM and the effects of classroom gender composition: New evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 102-123.
    20. Jiří Valecký, 2017. "Calculation of Solvency Capital Requirements for Non-life Underwriting Risk Using Generalized Linear Models," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 450-466.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:1842-1859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.