IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v47y2020i4p1035-1063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure time studies with intermittent observation and losses to follow‐up

Author

Listed:
  • Richard J. Cook
  • Jerald F. Lawless

Abstract

In health research interest often lies in modeling a failure time process but in many cohort studies failure status is only determined at scheduled assessment times. While the assessment times may be fixed upon study entry, individuals may become lost to follow‐up and miss visits subsequent to the time of loss to follow‐up. We consider a three‐state model to characterize a joint failure and loss to follow‐up process, and use it to investigate the impact of dependent loss to follow‐up on standard parametric, nonparametric, and semiparametric analysis. The effect of dependent loss to follow‐up is mitigated by fitting the joint model. The performance of standard methods is studied using the asymptotic theory of misspecified models, and the finite sample performance is examined for the standard and joint analyses through simulation studies. An application to data from a youth smoking prevention study is presented for illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard J. Cook & Jerald F. Lawless, 2020. "Failure time studies with intermittent observation and losses to follow‐up," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1035-1063, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:47:y:2020:i:4:p:1035-1063
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel O. Scharfstein, 2002. "Estimation of the failure time distribution in the presence of informative censoring," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(3), pages 617-634, August.
    2. Vernon T. Farewell & Jerald F. Lawless & Dafna D. Gladman & Murray B. Urowitz, 2003. "Tracing studies and analysis of the effect of loss to follow‐up on mortality estimation from patient registry data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 445-456, October.
    3. Satten, Glen A. & Datta, Somnath & Robins, James, 2001. "Estimating the marginal survival function in the presence of time dependent covariates," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 397-403, October.
    4. Cameron, R. & Brown, K.S. & Best, J.A. & Pelkman, C.L. & Madill, C.L. & Manske, S.R. & Payne, M.E., 1999. "Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(12), pages 1827-1831.
    5. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 333-342, June.
    6. Daniel Commenges, 2019. "Dealing with death when studying disease or physiological marker: the stochastic system approach to causality," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 381-405, July.
    7. Jane M. Lange & Rebecca A. Hubbard & Lurdes Y. T. Inoue & Vladimir N. Minin, 2015. "A joint model for multistate disease processes and random informative observation times, with applications to electronic medical records data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 90-101, March.
    8. Daniel Commenges & Anne Gégout‐Petit, 2007. "Likelihood for Generally Coarsened Observations from Multistate or Counting Process Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(2), pages 432-450, June.
    9. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Rejoinder to Discussions on Addressing an Idiosyncrasy in Estimating Survival Curves Using Double Sampling in the Presence of Self-Selected Right Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 351-353, June.
    10. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Menggang Yu, 2016. "Improving estimation efficiency for semi-competing risks data with partially observed terminal event," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 860-874, October.
    2. Richard J. Cook & Leilei Zeng & Grace Y. Yi, 2004. "Marginal Analysis of Incomplete Longitudinal Binary Data: A Cautionary Note on LOCF Imputation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 820-828, September.
    3. Menggang Yu & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2015. "Marginal and Conditional Distribution Estimation from Double-sampled Semi-competing Risks Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 87-103, March.
    4. Tianchen Qian & Constantine Frangakis & Constantin Yiannoutsos, 2020. "Deductive Semiparametric Estimation in Double-Sampling Designs with Application to PEPFAR," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 417-445, December.
    5. Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Discussion of Double Sampling for Survival Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 348-350, June.
    6. Vernon T. Farewell & Jerald F. Lawless & Dafna D. Gladman & Murray B. Urowitz, 2003. "Tracing studies and analysis of the effect of loss to follow‐up on mortality estimation from patient registry data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 445-456, October.
    7. Constantine E. Frangakis & Stuart G. Baker, 2001. "Compliance Subsampling Designs for Comparative Research: Estimation and Optimal Planning," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 899-908, September.
    8. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    9. Stephanie A. Kovalchik & Steven C. Martino & Rebecca L. Collins & William G. Shadel & Elizabeth J. D’Amico & Kirsten Becker, 2018. "Scaled Inverse Probability Weighting: A Method to Assess Potential Bias Due to Event Nonreporting in Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(3), pages 354-381, June.
    10. Subramanian, Sundarraman & Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar, 2010. "Doubly robust semiparametric estimation for the missing censoring indicator model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(7-8), pages 621-630, April.
    11. Russell T. Shinohara & Constantine E. Frangakis & Constantine G. Lyketsos, 2012. "A Broad Symmetry Criterion for Nonparametric Validity of Parametrically Based Tests in Randomized Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 85-91, March.
    12. Ming-Wen An & Constantine E. Frangakis & Beverly S. Musick & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2009. "The Need for Double-Sampling Designs in Survival Studies: An Application to Monitor PEPFAR," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 301-306, March.
    13. Rubin Daniel B & van der Laan Mark J., 2008. "Empirical Efficiency Maximization: Improved Locally Efficient Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Survival Analysis," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-42, May.
    14. Martin W G Brinkhof & Ben D Spycher & Constantin Yiannoutsos & Ralf Weigel & Robin Wood & Eugène Messou & Andrew Boulle & Matthias Egger & Jonathan A C Sterne & for the International epidemiological D, 2010. "Adjusting Mortality for Loss to Follow-Up: Analysis of Five ART Programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-6, November.
    15. Chih‐Yuan Hsu & Chen‐Hsin Chen & Ken‐Ning Hsu & Ya‐Hung Lu, 2019. "A useful design utilizing the information fraction in a group sequential clinical trial with censored survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 133-143, March.
    16. Agnes N Kiragga & Barbara Castelnuovo & Rachel Musomba & Jonathan Levin & Andrew Kambugu & Yukari C Manabe & Constantin T Yiannoutsos & Noah Kiwanuka, 2013. "Comparison of Methods for Correction of Mortality Estimates for Loss to Follow-Up after ART Initiation: A Case of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Das, Debojyoti & Bhatia, Vaneet & Kumar, Surya Bhushan & Basu, Sankarshan, 2022. "Do precious metals hedge crude oil volatility jumps?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. P.A.V.B. Swamy & I-Lok Chang & Jatinder S. Mehta & William H. Greene & Stephen G. Hall & George S. Tavlas, 2016. "Removing Specification Errors from the Usual Formulation of Binary Choice Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Carlo Altavilla & Raffaella Giacomini & Giuseppe Ragusa, 2017. "Anchoring the yield curve using survey expectations," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 1055-1068, September.
    20. Fernando Rios-Avila & Gustavo Canavire-Bacarreza, 2018. "Standard-error correction in two-stage optimization models: A quasi–maximum likelihood estimation approach," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 18(1), pages 206-222, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:47:y:2020:i:4:p:1035-1063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.