IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v4y2016i2p26-d71425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removing Specification Errors from the Usual Formulation of Binary Choice Models

Author

Listed:
  • P.A.V.B. Swamy

    (Federal Reserve Board (Retired), Washington, DC 20551, USA
    Current Address: 6333 Brocketts Crossing, Kingstowne, VA 22315, USA)

  • I-Lok Chang

    (Department of Mathematics (Retired), American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA)

  • Jatinder S. Mehta

    (Department of Mathematics (Retired), Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA)

  • William H. Greene

    (Department of Economics, New York University, 44 West Fourth Street, 7-90 New York, NY 10012, USA)

  • Stephen G. Hall

    (Leicester University, Room Astley Clarke 116, University Road, Leicester LEI 7RH, UK
    Bank of Greece, 21 El. Venizelos Ave., 10250 Athens, Greece)

  • George S. Tavlas

    (Leicester University, Room Astley Clarke 116, University Road, Leicester LEI 7RH, UK
    Monetary Policy Council, Bank of Greece, 21 El. Venizelos Ave., Athens 10250, Greece)

Abstract

We develop a procedure for removing four major specification errors from the usual formulation of binary choice models. The model that results from this procedure is different from the conventional probit and logit models. This difference arises as a direct consequence of our relaxation of the usual assumption that omitted regressors constituting the error term of a latent linear regression model do not introduce omitted regressor biases into the coefficients of the included regressors.

Suggested Citation

  • P.A.V.B. Swamy & I-Lok Chang & Jatinder S. Mehta & William H. Greene & Stephen G. Hall & George S. Tavlas, 2016. "Removing Specification Errors from the Usual Formulation of Binary Choice Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:26-:d:71425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/4/2/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/4/2/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Heckman, James J. & Schmierer, Daniel, 2010. "Tests of hypotheses arising in the correlated random coefficient model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1355-1367, November.
    3. Basmann, R. L., 1988. "Causality tests and observationally equivalent representations of econometric models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 69-104.
    4. Pratt, John W. & Schlaifer, Robert, 1988. "On the interpretation and observation of laws," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 23-52.
    5. Jesus Felipe & Franklin M. Fisher, 2003. "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 208-262, May.
    6. Jun Ma & Mark Wohar (ed.), 2014. "Recent Advances in Estimating Nonlinear Models," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-8060-0, December.
    7. Berenguer Rico, Vanessa, 2011. "Summability of stochastic processes: a generalization of integration and co-integration valid for non-linear processes," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1115, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    8. James J. Heckman & Edward Vytlacil, 2005. "Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Econometric Policy Evaluation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 669-738, May.
    9. White, Halbert, 1980. "Using Least Squares to Approximate Unknown Regression Functions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 21(1), pages 149-170, February.
    10. P.A.V.B. Swamy & George S. Tavlas & Stephen G. Hall, 2015. "On the Interpretation of Instrumental Variables in the Presence of Specification Errors," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Swamy, P. A. V. B. & Von Zur Muehlen, Peter, 1988. "Further thoughts on testing for causality with econometric models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 105-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. P.A.V.B. Swamy & Jatinder S. Mehta & I-Lok Chang, 2017. "Endogeneity, Time-Varying Coefficients, and Incorrect vs. Correct Ways of Specifying the Error Terms of Econometric Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P.A.V.B. Swamy & Stephen G. Hall & George S. Tavlas & I-Lok Chang & Heather D. Gibson & William H. Greene & Jatinder S. Mehta, 2016. "A Method for Measuring Treatment Effects on the Treated without Randomization," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Swamy, P.A.V.B. & Mehta, J.S. & Tavlas, G.S. & Hall, S.G., 2015. "Two applications of the random coefficient procedure: Correcting for misspecifications in a small area level model and resolving Simpson's paradox," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 93-98.
    3. Swamy Paravastu & Peter Muehlen & Jatinder Singh Mehta & I-Lok Chang, 2022. "The State Of Econometrics After John W. Pratt, Robert Schlaifer, Brian Skyrms, And Robert L. Basmann," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 627-654, November.
    4. Jalal Akhavein & P. Swamy & Stephen Taubman & Rao Singamsetti, 1997. "A General Method of Deriving the Inefficiencies of Banks from a Profit Function," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 71-93, March.
    5. Bruce E. Hansen & Seojeong Lee, 2021. "Inference for Iterated GMM Under Misspecification," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 1419-1447, May.
    6. Hondroyiannis, George & Swamy, P. A. V. B. & Tavlas, George S., 2001. "Modelling the long-run demand for money in the United Kingdom: a random coefficient analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 475-501, August.
    7. P.A.V.B. Swamy & Jatinder S. Mehta & I-Lok Chang, 2017. "Endogeneity, Time-Varying Coefficients, and Incorrect vs. Correct Ways of Specifying the Error Terms of Econometric Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Dennis J. Aigner, 1988. "Symposium on Econometric Methodology 1 On Econometric Methodology and the Search for Causal Laws," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 64(4), pages 323-326, December.
    9. Sloczynski, Tymon, 2018. "A General Weighted Average Representation of the Ordinary and Two-Stage Least Squares Estimands," IZA Discussion Papers 11866, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Gadea Rivas, María Dolores & Gonzalo, Jesús, 2020. "Trends in distributional characteristics: Existence of global warming," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 153-174.
    11. Pedro Carneiro & James J. Heckman & Edward J. Vytlacil, 2011. "Estimating Marginal Returns to Education," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2754-2781, October.
    12. Stephen Hall & George Hondroyiannis & P. Swamy & George Tavlas, 2010. "The Fisher Effect Puzzle: A Case of Non-Linear Relationship?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-103, February.
    13. Tymon S{l}oczy'nski, 2018. "Interpreting OLS Estimands When Treatment Effects Are Heterogeneous: Smaller Groups Get Larger Weights," Papers 1810.01576, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    14. Wu, Ximing & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2007. "Information-Theoretic Deconvolution Approximation of Treatment Effect Distribution," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9vd036zx, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    15. Christian N. Brinch & Magne Mogstad & Matthew Wiswall, 2017. "Beyond LATE with a Discrete Instrument," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(4), pages 985-1039.
    16. Bousquet, Alain & Ivaldi, Marc, 1998. "An individual choice model of energy mix," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 263-286, September.
    17. P. Swamy & George Tavlas, 2007. "The New Keynesian Phillips Curve and Inflation Expectations: Re-Specification and Interpretation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 31(2), pages 293-306, May.
    18. Hall, Stephen G. & Hondroyiannis, George & Swamy, P.A.V.B. & Tavlas, George S., 2009. "Assessing the causal relationship between euro-area money and prices in a time-varying environment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 760-766, July.
    19. Hall, Stephen G. & Swamy, P. A. V. B. & Tavlas, George S., 2017. "Time-Varying Coefficient Models: A Proposal For Selecting The Coefficient Driver Sets," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 1158-1174, July.
    20. Jin Seo Cho & Meng Huang & Halbert White, 2009. "Testing for a Constant Mean Function using Functional Regression," Discussion Paper Series 0915, Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    binary choice models; specification errors; stochastic coefficients;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
    • C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C2 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables
    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • C4 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling
    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:26-:d:71425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.