IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sajeco/v91y2023i3p375-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government social protection programme spending and household welfare in Lesotho

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Boko
  • Dhushyanth Raju
  • Stephen D. Younger

Abstract

Lesotho has notably high levels of poverty and inequality despite a high level of government spending on social protection programmes. We assess the performance of this spending in reducing consumption poverty and inequality, applying benefit incidence and microsimulation methods to 2017/2018 household survey data. We investigate the distributional effects of actual spending as well as those of a hypothetical alternative in which the spending is targeted through a proxy means test (PMT) formula used by the government for some programmes. We find that government spending on social protection programmes in Lesotho substantially reduces poverty and inequality. For most programmes, the hypothetical alternative of targeting spending to poorer households through the government's PMT formula would have no better distributional effects than current programme spending. The exception is postsecondary education bursaries, which are costly and regressive. Retaining bursaries only for poorer students, and reallocating the outlay this saves to a transfer targeted to poorer households through the government's PMT formula, could reduce poverty and inequality significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Boko & Dhushyanth Raju & Stephen D. Younger, 2023. "Government social protection programme spending and household welfare in Lesotho," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 91(3), pages 375-393, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:91:y:2023:i:3:p:375-393
    DOI: 10.1111/saje.12341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12341
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/saje.12341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:91:y:2023:i:3:p:375-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.