IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v13y2021i6p1729-1749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic impact of the inland water fisheries/aquaculture industry: The case of the eel industry in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Katsuhiro Sakurai
  • Hiroyuki Shibusawa

Abstract

Despite the decline in freshwater eel farming, eels remain an important food resource in Japan. This study analyses economic impacts of inland water fisheries and inland aquaculture industry as the eel industry using hypothetical extraction method. As a result, if inland water fisheries were eliminated, direct economic value would be US$202 million. In the case of the inland water aquaculture industry, direct economic value was US$777 million. Additionally, indirect economic effects have affected other related industries. Thus the policies to protect eels and promote the development of full life‐cycle aquaculture are needed to sustain the eel industry and related industries. A pesar del declive de la cría de anguilas de agua dulce, éstas siguen siendo un importante recurso alimentario en el Japón. En este estudio se analizan las repercusiones económicas de la pesca en aguas del interior del país y de la industria de la acuicultura como la de la anguila, utilizando un método de extracción hipotético. Como resultado, si se eliminase la pesca en aguas de interior, el valor económico directo sería de 202 millones de dólares estadounidenses. En el caso de la acuicultura en aguas de interior, el valor económico directo sería de 777 millones de dólares. Además, los efectos económicos indirectos han afectado a otras industrias relacionadas. Por tanto, las políticas para proteger a las anguilas y promover el desarrollo de la acuicultura de ciclo completo son necesarias para que la industria de la anguila y las industrias relacionadas sean sostenibles. 淡水ウナギ養殖の衰退にもかかわらず、ウナギは今なお日本における重要な食料資源である。本稿では、仮想抽出法を用いて、ウナギ産業としての内水面漁業と内水面養殖業の経済的影響を分析する。結果は、内水面漁業が廃止された場合、直接的な経済価値は2億200万米ドルとなる。内水面養殖業の場合では、直接的な経済価値は7億7700万米ドルであった。さらに、間接的な経済効果は他の関連産業にも影響を与える。したがって、ウナギ産業とそれに関連する産業を維持するためには、ウナギを保護し、完全養殖の発展を促進する政策が必要であるといえる。

Suggested Citation

  • Katsuhiro Sakurai & Hiroyuki Shibusawa, 2021. "The economic impact of the inland water fisheries/aquaculture industry: The case of the eel industry in Japan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 1729-1749, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:1729-1749
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12323
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bob van Burken & Yasushi Kondo, 2019. "Hypothetical extractions from a global perspective," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 505-519, October.
    2. Yue-Jun Zhang & Xiao-Juan Bian & Weiping Tan, 2018. "The linkages of sectoral carbon dioxide emission caused by household consumption in China: evidence from the hypothetical extraction method," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1743-1775, June.
    3. Erik Dietzenbacher & Michael L. Lahr, 2013. "Expanding Extractions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 341-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos & Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro & Rodrigo Barbosa de Cerqueira, 2020. "The informal sector and Covid‐19 economic impacts: The case of Bahia, Brazil," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 1273-1285, December.
    2. Giammetti, Raffaele & Papi, Luca & Teobaldelli, Désirée & Ticchi, Davide, 2022. "The optimality of age-based lockdown policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 722-738.
    3. Chen, Zhenni & Liu, Xi & Li, Jianglong, 2022. "Identifying channels of environmental impacts of transport sector through sectoral linkage analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Maeno, Keitaro & Tokito, Shohei & Kagawa, Shigemi, 2022. "CO2 mitigation through global supply chain restructuring," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Maria Llop, 2022. "Quantifying the employment impacts of gross exports: a global accounting perspective," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Hertwich, Edgar, 2019. "The Carbon Footprint of Material Production Rises to 23% of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions," SocArXiv n9ecw, Center for Open Science.
    7. Maeno, Keitaro, 2023. "Identifying critical sectors in the restructuring of low-carbon global supply chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    8. Luis E Pedauga & Ana Pardo-Fanjul & Juan C Redondo & José M Izquierdo, 2022. "Assessing the economic contribution of sports tourism events: A regional social accounting matrix analysis approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 599-620, May.
    9. Grant Allan & Kevin Connolly & Peter McGregor & Andrew G Ross, 2019. "Economic activity supported by offshore wind: a hypothetical extraction study," Working Papers 1911, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    10. Aihua Wang & Qiqi Ruan & Teng Zhou & Yanzhen Wang, 2022. "Digitizable Product Trade Development and Carbon Emission: Evidence from 94 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Severin Reissl & Alessandro Caiani & Francesco Lamperti & Mattia Guerini & Fabio Vanni & Giorgio Fagiolo & Tommaso Ferraresi & Leonardo Ghezzi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini, 2022. "Assessing the Economic Impact of Lockdowns in Italy: A Computational Input–Output Approach [Nonlinear Production Networks with an Application to the Covid-19 Crisis]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(2), pages 358-409.
    12. Inaki Arto & Erik Dietzenbacher & Jose Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2019. "Measuring bilateral trade in terms of value added," JRC Research Reports JRC116694, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Rossella Bardazzi & Leonardo Ghezzi, 2022. "Large-scale multinational shocks and international trade: a non-zero-sum game," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 383-409, October.
    14. Ian P.Cassar, 2017. "Assessing structural change in the Maltese economy via the application of a hypothetical extraction analysis," CBM Working Papers WP/01/2017, Central Bank of Malta.
    15. Seyed Reza Mirnezami & Sajad Rajabi, 2021. "Changing Primary Energy Consumption Due to COVID-19: The Study 20 European Economies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 615-631.
    16. Fitsum Semere Weldegiorgis & Evelyn Dietsche & Shabbir Ahmad, 2023. "Inter-Sectoral Economic Linkages in the Mining Industries of Botswana and Tanzania: Analysis Using Partial Hypothetical Extraction Method," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Torre Cepeda Leonardo E. & Chapa Cantú Joana C. & González González Eva Edith, 2020. "Economic Integration Mexico-United States and Regional Performance in Mexico," Working Papers 2020-06, Banco de México.
    18. Giammetti, Raffaele, 2019. "Tariffs, Domestic Import Substitution and Trade Diversion in Input-Output Production Networks: how to deal with Brexit," MPRA Paper 93229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Zhao, Hongyan & Zhang, Qiang & Huo, Hong & Lin, Jintai & Liu, Zhu & Wang, Haikun & Guan, Dabo & He, Kebin, 2016. "Environment-economy tradeoff for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei’s exports," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 926-935.
    20. Emre Ünal, 2021. "Industrial growth models by input–output analysis and an institutional approach to the automotive industry in China and Turkey," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 175-203, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:1729-1749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.