IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v12y2020i5p755-766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living together at the cross‐border regional scale in Europe: Supra‐national and trans‐national identity models in the Greater Region

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Lamour

Abstract

The EU integration process has favoured the development of cross‐border regional identities in Europe. However, what types of identity models are mobilized in these areas and on what grounds? Based on a case study of the Greater Region centred on Luxembourg, the analysis shows that parallel identity models can be used to reinforce political executive bonds and functional economic integration beyond borders in relation to a new regional ideology. This choice based on a specific context is a background of spatial resilience beyond borders, imagined as a property of and a response by a regional system facing common challenges. El proceso de integración de la Unión Europea ha favorecido el desarrollo de identidades regionales transfronterizas en Europa. Sin embargo, ¿qué tipos de modelos de identidad se pueden encontrar en estas áreas y por qué motivos? A partir de un estudio monográfico de la Gran Región centrado en Luxemburgo, el análisis muestra que se pueden utilizar modelos de identidad paralela para reforzar los vínculos entre el ejecutivo político y la integración económica funcional más allá de las fronteras, en relación con una nueva ideología regional. Esta elección, basada en un contexto específico, es un antecedente de resiliencia espacial más allá de las fronteras, concebido tanto como una propiedad o una respuesta de un sistema regional que se enfrenta a retos comunes. EUの統合プロセスは、欧州における国境を越えた地域的アイデンティティの発展を支持してきた。しかし、これらの地域ではどのようなタイプのアイデンティティモデルがどのような根拠に基づいて動員されているのか。ルクセンブルクの中心にあるグレーター・リージョンを事例にしたケーススタディに基づき、分析から、新しい地域イデオロギーに関連して国境を越えた政治の行政的連携と経済の機能的統合を強化するために、並列アイデンティティモデルが使用できることが示された。特異的な状況を根拠としたこの選択は、国境を越えた空間的レジリエンスが背景にあり、共通の課題に直面している地域システムの特性と反応であると想像される。

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Lamour, 2020. "Living together at the cross‐border regional scale in Europe: Supra‐national and trans‐national identity models in the Greater Region," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 755-766, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:755-766
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(6), pages 861-879, December.
    2. Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola, 2019. "Border-regional resilience in EU internal and external border areas in Finland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 1587-1606, August.
    3. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacek Rudewicz, 2023. "The Concept of a Dual-System Model of Life and Conducting Business in Cross-Border Relations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 482-497.
    2. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Einar Leknes & Janne Thygesen, 2013. "Europeanisation of Regional Policy Making: A Boolean Analysis of Norwegian Counties' Participation in the Eu's Interreg Programme," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 381-400, June.
    2. DURAND Frédéric & LAMOUR Christian, 2013. "Les réseaux de la gouvernance transfrontalière : une centralité changeante du pouvoir étatique ? L'étude de l’Eurométropole de Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-14, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    3. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Carmen Valentina RADULESCU, 2019. "Local Development Opportunities In The Context Of Sustainable Development By Applying The Concept Of Smart Village In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 1059-1067, November.
    4. James Hughes & Gwendolyn Sasse & Claire Gordon, 2002. "Saying `Maybe' to the `Return to Europe'," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 327-355, September.
    5. Halyna LYTVYN & Andriy TYUSHKA, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability nexus at the EU's Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border cooperation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 146-183, November.
    6. Dejan Stjepanović, 2015. "Territoriality and Citizenship: Membership and Sub-State Polities in Post-Yugoslav Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1030-1055, August.
    7. Michael Longo, 2003. "European Integration: Between Micro‐Regionalism and Globalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 475-494, June.
    8. Rhys Jones & Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Glenn Simpson, 2004. "Devolution, State Personnel, and the Production of New Territories of Governance in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 89-109, January.
    9. Xiaobo Su, 2013. "From Frontier to Bridgehead: Cross-border Regions and the Experience of Yunnan, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1213-1232, July.
    10. John Lovering, 2001. "The Coming Regional Crisis (And How To Avoid It)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 349-354.
    11. Svensson, Bo, 2000. "The Scope And Potential Of Multi-Level Governance In Eu External Relations - Lessons From The Euro-Arctic," ERSA conference papers ersa00p54, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Lagendijk Arnoud & Velde Martin van der & Kuijpers Mark, 2020. "Looking for causes of effects in cases: Evaluating intermunicipal collaboration in The Netherlands applying QCA," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 149-164, November.
    13. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & James R Wilson & Markku Sotarauta, 2017. "Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 559-568, June.
    14. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    15. Joe Painter, 2013. "Regional Biopolitics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1235-1248, September.
    16. Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2010. "Devolution Dynamics of Spanish Local Government," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(6), pages 1476-1495, June.
    17. repec:rom:campco:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:4-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Aron Buzogány & Umut Korkut, 2013. "Administrative Reform and Regional Development Discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation Going NUTS?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1555-1577, October.
    19. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2004. "‘Té Para Todos’? A Comparison of the Processes of Devolution in Spain and the UK," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2163-2181, December.
    20. Philip Catney & John M Henneberry, 2016. "Public entrepreneurship and the politics of regeneration in multi-level governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1324-1343, November.
    21. Alistair Cole, 2004. "Devolution and decentralization in Wales and Brittany: a framework for evaluation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 354-368, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:755-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.