IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v26y2009i4p473-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Cosmology of Risks and Crises: Time for a Radical Shift in Paradigm and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Lagadec

Abstract

Our current system for homeland security does not provide the necessary framework to manage the challenges posed by 21st‐Century catastrophic threats. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina–Lessons Learned The White House (2006, 52) Abstract Crises in the twenty‐first century differ—structurally—from those we had to deal with in the last century. Crises of the twentieth century were traditionally defined and handled as a combination of “threat, urgency, and uncertainty.” Today, crises are better described in terms of a destruction of vital references and a dynamic of systemic implosions. If crises were once a type of severe, dynamic accident, they are now the essential mode of life in our hypercomplex systems. These transboundary crises mark a watershed between mind‐sets and tools of the past, and the new strategic landscape that we are now in. The intellectual and governance challenges are extreme. But looking back is not an option. It is vital to forge new routes into Terrae Incognitae. The goal of this article is to help build (1) a renewed understanding of the emerging challenges we face; and (2) a better strategic response to these systemic dislocations.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Lagadec, 2009. "A New Cosmology of Risks and Crises: Time for a Radical Shift in Paradigm and Practice," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(4), pages 473-486, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:4:p:473-486
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00396.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00396.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00396.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shehla Najib & Rashidi.Z, 2018. "Student Protests In Universities: Exploring The Model For Crisis Management, Crisis Leadership And Organizational Learning," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 143-159.
    2. Anouck Adrot & Jean-Luc Moriceau, 2013. "Introducing performativity to crisis management theory : an illustration from the 2003 French heat wave crisis response," Post-Print hal-01451075, HAL.
    3. Nicolas Rossignol & Pierre Delvenne & Catrinel Turcanu, 2015. "Rethinking Vulnerability Analysis and Governance with Emphasis on a Participatory Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 129-141, January.
    4. Aino Ruggiero, 2016. "Making Communication Strategy Choices in a Fast Evolving Crisis Situation—Results from a Table-Top Discussion on an Anthrax Scenario," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Frauke Austermann & Wei Shen & Assen Slim, 2020. "Governmental responses to COVID-19 and its economic impact: a brief Euro-Asian comparison," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 211-216, June.
    6. Michel Cros & Sophie Cros, 2015. "Management of crisis communication [Gestión de la comunicación de crisis]," Post-Print hal-02286833, HAL.
    7. Michel Cros & Sophie Gaultier-Gaillard, 2015. "Management of crisis communication [Gestion de la comunicacion de crisis]," Post-Print hal-01850968, HAL.
    8. Shehla Najib & Rashidi. Z, 2018. "Student Protests In Universities: Exploring The Model For Crisis Management, Crisis Leadership And Organizational Learning," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 14-12.
    9. Qing Yang & Yanxia Zhu & Xingxing Liu & Lingmei Fu & Qianqian Guo, 2019. "Bayesian-Based NIMBY Crisis Transformation Path Discovery for Municipal Solid Waste Incineration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:4:p:473-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.