IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v92y2024i3p209-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will automation and robotics lead to more inequality?

Author

Listed:
  • Elise S. Brezis
  • Amir Rubin

Abstract

This paper presents a new framework for analyzing automation, robotics, and high‐tech, which differs from the canonical model of technological progress by incorporating the higher education system. The main difference is that there is not just one type of skilled workers, but two types, and there is not one type of education but two ‐ elite universities and standard ones. The gap between these two types of education is called ‘elitism gap’. The ‘elitism gap’ in the higher‐education sector enables a separation of individuals by their abilities. Since the economy is divided between low‐tech and high‐tech sectors, the elitism gap leads to a separating equilibrium in which, high‐ability workers graduating from top universities work in the high‐tech sector, while low‐ability workers, graduate from standard universities and work in the low‐tech industries. In consequence, human capital in both industries is different, which leads to wage inequality. We then analyze the effects of an increased use of robotics on inequality. We show that robots affect the “matching effect” between abilities and education, and in consequence, inequality increases. We also show that wages and productivity gaps between high‐tech and low‐tech sectors are fueled by the elitism gap in higher education. This leads to heterogeneity in human capital, and therefore to an increase in wage inequality. We develop an index of the elitism gap, and show a positive correlation between the index of elitism gap and inequality in OECD countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Elise S. Brezis & Amir Rubin, 2024. "Will automation and robotics lead to more inequality?," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 92(3), pages 209-230, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:92:y:2024:i:3:p:209-230
    DOI: 10.1111/manc.12465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/manc.12465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:92:y:2024:i:3:p:209-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.