IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v51y2015i2p65-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating External Barriers to Implementing Green Supply Chain Management: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Green-Tech Companies' Rare Earth Metals Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Rauer
  • Lutz Kaufmann

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="jscm12063-abs-0001"> The supply chain management literature has investigated myriad barriers to implementing green supply chain management (GSCM). However, little research has analyzed the role of capabilities to mitigate such barriers, a research gap we address in this study using an inductive research approach. Following a Straussian approach to grounded theory, the study analyzes data generated from ten Western green-tech companies sourcing technically indispensable rare earth metals from Chinese suppliers. Our interpretive research findings show that these companies face two categories of salient, external barriers to GSCM–supply chain structure-related and environmental standards-related implementation barriers. To cope with these barriers, we argue that firms require three categories of dynamic capabilities: sensing capabilities, alignment capabilities, and resilience capabilities. By connecting our research findings with the dynamic capabilities literature, we derive theoretical propositions to guide further research on studying the role of dynamic capabilities in the implementation of GSCM.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Rauer & Lutz Kaufmann, 2015. "Mitigating External Barriers to Implementing Green Supply Chain Management: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Green-Tech Companies' Rare Earth Metals Supply Chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(2), pages 65-88, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:51:y:2015:i:2:p:65-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jscm.2015.51.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara K. Wichmann & Craig R. Carter & Lutz Kaufmann & Jeffrey R. Wilson, 2016. "Making Environmental SCM Initiatives Work—Moving Beyond the Dyad to Gain Affective Commitment," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 21-40, January.
    2. Siems, Erik & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities in sustainable supply chain management: An inter-temporal comparison of the food and automotive industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Ying Ye & Kwok Hung Lau, 2022. "Competitive Green Supply Chain Transformation with Dynamic Capabilities—An Exploratory Case Study of Chinese Electronics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Hung M. Nguyen & George Onofrei & Dothang Truong & Simon Lockrey, 2020. "Customer green orientation and process innovation alignment: A configuration approach in the global manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2498-2513, September.
    5. Walter Leal Filho & Richard Kotter & Pinar Gökçin Özuyar & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Newton R. Matandirotya, 2023. "Understanding Rare Earth Elements as Critical Raw Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Li, Lingjia & Shan, Shuo & Dai, Jing & Che, Wen & Shou, Yongyi, 2022. "The impact of green supply chain management on green innovation: A meta-analysis from the inter-organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Saraji, Mahyar Kamali & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Evaluating the circular supply chain adoption in manufacturing sectors: A picture fuzzy approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Anne M. Quarshie & Rudolf Leuschner, 2020. "Interorganizational Interaction in Disaster Response Networks: A Government Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(3), pages 3-25, July.
    9. Lance W. Saunders & Wendy L. Tate & George A. Zsidisin & Joe Miemczyk, 2019. "The Influence of Network Exchange Brokers on Sustainable Initiatives in Organizational Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 849-868, February.
    10. Daniela Ortiz‐Avram & Nelly Ovcharova & Alexander Engelmann, 2024. "Dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Toward a typology based on dimensions of sustainability‐oriented innovation and stakeholder integration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2969-3004, May.
    11. Dahlquist, Steven H., 2021. "How green product demands influence industrial buyer/seller relationships, knowledge, and marketing dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 402-413.
    12. Shumin Liu & Young-Tae Chang, 2017. "Manufacturers’ Closed-Loop Orientation for Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-29, February.
    13. Mahmoud Abou Kamar & Omaima Munawar Albadry & Samar Sheikhelsouk & Mohammed Hasan Ali Al-Abyadh & Omar Alsetoohy, 2023. "Dynamic Capabilities Influence on the Operational Performance of Hotel Food Supply Chains: A Mediation-Moderation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Anand Nair & Tingting Yan & Young K. Ro & Adegoke Oke & Todd H. Chiles & Su-Yol Lee, 2016. "How Environmental Innovations Emerge and Proliferate in Supply Networks: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 66-86, April.
    15. Anne M. Quarshie & Rudolf Leuschner, 2018. "Cross-Sector Social Interactions and Systemic Change in Disaster Response: A Qualitative Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 357-384, June.
    16. Tino T. Herden & Benjamin Nitsche & Benno Gerlach, 2020. "Overcoming Barriers in Supply Chain Analytics—Investigating Measures in LSCM Organizations," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Huo, Baofeng & Gu, Minhao & Jiang, Bin, 2018. "China-related POM research: Literature review and suggestions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 134-153.
    18. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2018. "The Selected Method and Tools for Performance Measurement in the Green Supply Chain—Survey Analysis in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:51:y:2015:i:2:p:65-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.