IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v76y2014i1p141-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model selection principles in misspecified models

Author

Listed:
  • Jinchi Lv
  • Jun S. Liu

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssb12023-abs-0001"> Model selection is of fundamental importance to high dimensional modelling featured in many contemporary applications. Classical principles of model selection include the Bayesian principle and the Kullback–Leibler divergence principle, which lead to the Bayesian information criterion and Akaike information criterion respectively, when models are correctly specified. Yet model misspecification is unavoidable in practice. We derive novel asymptotic expansions of the two well-known principles in misspecified generalized linear models, which give the generalized Bayesian information criterion and generalized Akaike information criterion. A specific form of prior probabilities motivated by the Kullback–Leibler divergence principle leads to the generalized Bayesian information criterion with prior probability, GBIC p , which can be naturally decomposed as the sum of the negative maximum quasi-log-likelihood, a penalty on model dimensionality, and a penalty on model misspecification directly. Numerical studies demonstrate the advantage of the new methods for model selection in both correctly specified and misspecified models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinchi Lv & Jun S. Liu, 2014. "Model selection principles in misspecified models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(1), pages 141-167, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:76:y:2014:i:1:p:141-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssb.2013.76.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minerva Mukhopadhyay & Tapas Samanta, 2017. "A mixture of g-priors for variable selection when the number of regressors grows with the sample size," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(2), pages 377-404, June.
    2. Kuang-Liang Chang & Charles Ka Yui Leung, 2022. "How did the asset markets change after the Global Financial Crisis?," Chapters, in: Charles K.Y. Leung (ed.), Handbook of Real Estate and Macroeconomics, chapter 12, pages 312-336, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. George Tzavelas & Maria Douli & Polychronis Economou, 2017. "Model misspecification effects for biased samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 171-185, February.
    4. Gourieroux, Christian & Tiomo, Andre, 2019. "The Evaluation of Model Risk for Probability of Default and Expected Loss," MPRA Paper 95795, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Fabio Canova & Christian Matthes, 2021. "Dealing with misspecification in structural macroeconometric models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 313-350, May.
    6. Emre Demirkaya & Yang Feng & Pallavi Basu & Jinchi Lv, 2022. "Large-scale model selection in misspecified generalized linear models [Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(1), pages 123-136.
    7. Xuewei Cheng & Gang Li & Hong Wang, 2024. "The concordance filter: an adaptive model-free feature screening procedure," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 2413-2436, July.
    8. Haili Zhang & Guohua Zou, 2020. "Cross-Validation Model Averaging for Generalized Functional Linear Model," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, February.
    9. Pan, Yingli, 2022. "Feature screening and FDR control with knockoff features for ultrahigh-dimensional right-censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Hung Hung & Su-Yun Huang & Ching-Kang Ing, 2022. "A generalized information criterion for high-dimensional PCA rank selection," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1295-1321, August.
    11. Songhua Tan & Qianqian Zhu, 2022. "Asymmetric linear double autoregression," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 371-388, May.
    12. Zemin Zheng & Jinchi Lv & Wei Lin, 2021. "Nonsparse Learning with Latent Variables," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 346-359, January.
    13. Eguchi, Shoichi, 2018. "Model comparison for generalized linear models with dependent observations," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 171-188.
    14. Francesca Iorio & Riccardo Lucchetti & Rosaria Simone, 2024. "Testing distributional assumptions in CUB models for the analysis of rating data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(3), pages 669-701, September.
    15. Elizabeth Hou & Earl Lawrence & Alfred O Hero, 2021. "Penalized ensemble Kalman filters for high dimensional non-linear systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Giessing, Alexander & He, Xuming, 2019. "On the predictive risk in misspecified quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 235-260.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:76:y:2014:i:1:p:141-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.