IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v184y2021i2p643-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging auxiliary information on marginal distributions in nonignorable models for item and unit nonresponse

Author

Listed:
  • Olanrewaju Akande
  • Gabriel Madson
  • D. Sunshine Hillygus
  • Jerome P. Reiter

Abstract

Often, government agencies and survey organizations know the population counts or percentages for some of the variables in a survey. These may be available from auxiliary sources, for example administrative databases or other high‐quality surveys. We present and illustrate a model‐based framework for leveraging such auxiliary marginal information when handling unit and item nonresponse. We show how one can use the margins to specify different missingness mechanisms for each type of nonresponse. We use the framework to impute missing values in voter turnout in a subset of data from the US Current Population Survey. In doing so, we examine the sensitivity of results to different assumptions about the unit and item nonresponse.

Suggested Citation

  • Olanrewaju Akande & Gabriel Madson & D. Sunshine Hillygus & Jerome P. Reiter, 2021. "Leveraging auxiliary information on marginal distributions in nonignorable models for item and unit nonresponse," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 643-662, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:184:y:2021:i:2:p:643-662
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12635
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:6479 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. McDonald, Michael P. & Popkin, Samuel L., 2001. "The Myth of the Vanishing Voter," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(4), pages 963-974, December.
    3. Reiter, Jerome P. & Raghunathan, Trivellore E., 2007. "The Multiple Adaptations of Multiple Imputation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1462-1471, December.
    4. Nevo, Aviv, 2003. "Using Weights to Adjust for Sample Selection When Auxiliary Information Is Available," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 43-52, January.
    5. Keisuke Hirano & Guido W. Imbens & Geert Ridder & Donald B. Rubin, 2001. "Combining Panel Data Sets with Attrition and Refreshment Samples," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(6), pages 1645-1659, November.
    6. Bhattacharya, Debopam, 2008. "Inference in panel data models under attrition caused by unobservables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 430-446, June.
    7. Mauricio Sadinle & Jerome P Reiter, 2019. "Sequentially additive nonignorable missing data modelling using auxiliary marginal information," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 106(4), pages 889-911.
    8. Si, Yajuan & Reiter, Jerome P. & Hillygus, D. Sunshine, 2015. "Semi-parametric Selection Models for Potentially Non-ignorable Attrition in Panel Studies with Refreshment Samples," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 92-112, January.
    9. John L. Czajka with other members of the Panel on the U.S. Census Bureau's Reengineered Survey of Income Program Participation. Constance F. Citro John Karl Scholz & Editors. Committee on National Sta, "undated". "Reengineering the Survey of Income and Program Participation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 92ffe3e10fec4587859f12cb5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Jae Kwang Kim, 2011. "Parametric fractional imputation for missing data analysis," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(1), pages 119-132.
    11. repec:mpr:mprres:4780 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:mpr:mprres:4937 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Rebecca R. Andridge & Roderick J. A. Little, 2010. "A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 40-64, April.
    14. Mauricio Sadinle & Jerome P. Reiter, 2017. "Itemwise conditionally independent nonresponse modelling for incomplete multivariate data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(1), pages 207-220.
    15. Burden, Barry C., 2000. "Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 389-398, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grigory Franguridi & Lidia Kosenkova, 2024. "Closed-form estimation and inference for panels with attrition and refreshment samples," Papers 2410.11263, arXiv.org.
    2. Heng Chen & Marie-Hélène Felt & Kim P. Huynh, 2017. "Retail payment innovations and cash usage: accounting for attrition by using refreshment samples," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(2), pages 503-530, February.
    3. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2019. "A panel quantile approach to attrition bias in Big Data: Evidence from a randomized experiment," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 61-82.
    4. Emre Ekinci & Insan Tunah & Berk Yavuzoglu, 2017. "Rescaled Additivity Non-Ignorable (RAN) Model of Generalized Attrition," Working Papers 1702, Nazarbayev University, Department of Economics, revised Mar 2017.
    5. Marcel Das & Vera Toepoel & Arthur van Soest, 2011. "Nonparametric Tests of Panel Conditioning and Attrition Bias in Panel Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 32-56, February.
    6. Takahiro Hoshino & Keisuke Takahata, 2018. "Identification of heterogeneous treatment effects as a function of potential untreated outcome under the nonignorable assignment condition," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2018-005, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    7. Rene Segers & Philip Hans Franses, 2014. "Panel design effects on response rates and response quality," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(1), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Takahiro Hoshino & Yuya Shimizu, 2019. "Doubly Robust-type Estimation of Population Moments and Parameters in Biased Sampling," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2019-006, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    9. Xavier d'Haultfoeuille & Stefan Hoderlein & Yuya Sasaki, 2013. "Nonlinear difference-in-differences in repeated cross sections with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP40/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Yijie Xue & Nicole Lazar, 2012. "Empirical likelihood-based hot deck imputation methods," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 629-646.
    11. Richard B. Freeman, 2003. "What, Me Vote?," NBER Working Papers 9896, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Yamana Kazufumi, 2020. "Monte Carlo Evidence on the Estimation Method for Industry Dynamics," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Joachim Inkmann, 2010. "Estimating Firm Size Elasticities of Product and Process R&D," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 77(306), pages 384-402, April.
    14. Ton de Waal & Wieger Coutinho, 2017. "Preserving Logical Relations while Estimating Missing Values," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(3), pages 47-59, September.
    15. Nail Kashaev, 2022. "Estimation of Parametric Binary Outcome Models with Degenerate Pure Choice-Based Data with Application to COVID-19-Positive Tests from British Columbia," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20225, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    16. Seik Kim, 2013. "Wage Mobility of Foreign-Born Workers in the United States," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 48(3), pages 628-658.
    17. Devereux, Paul J. & Tripathi, Gautam, 2009. "Optimally combining censored and uncensored datasets," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 17-32, July.
    18. Sasaki, Yuya, 2015. "Heterogeneity and selection in dynamic panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 236-249.
    19. Christophe Bell'ego & David Benatia & Vincent Dortet-Bernardet, 2023. "The Chained Difference-in-Differences," Papers 2301.01085, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    20. Seik Kim, "undated". "Sample Attrition in the Presence of Population Attrition," Working Papers UWEC-2009-02, University of Washington, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:184:y:2021:i:2:p:643-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.