IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v61y2024i4p1590-1617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do Status Differentials Affect the Unplanned Dissolution of Alliances?

Author

Listed:
  • David H. Weng
  • Yi Tang

Abstract

Previous research suggests that firms tend to form alliances with counterparts of similar status. However, it remains unclear whether the principle of status homophily helps or hinders the alliance process. In this study, we contend that status differentials, rather than status similarity, can reduce the likelihood of the unplanned dissolution of an alliance, as a clearer order of status helps to resolve interfirm discrepancies and conflicts during collaborative processes. The results based on a sample of joint ventures in the US computer and telecommunications industries support our arguments. Further, we find that the effect of status differentials on the unplanned dissolution of alliances is strengthened when the high‐status firm performs better than the low‐status firm and when the two firms are from more related industries. Our findings call into question the emphasis on status homophily in the management of alliances following their formation.

Suggested Citation

  • David H. Weng & Yi Tang, 2024. "How do Status Differentials Affect the Unplanned Dissolution of Alliances?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1590-1617, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:1590-1617
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12938
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:1590-1617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.