IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v64y2013i2p254-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Teun Lucassen
  • Rienco Muilwijk
  • Matthijs L. Noordzij
  • Jan Maarten Schraagen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Teun Lucassen & Rienco Muilwijk & Matthijs L. Noordzij & Jan Maarten Schraagen, 2013. "Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(2), pages 254-264, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:64:y:2013:i:2:p:254-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/asi.22743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miriam J. Metzger, 2007. "Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2078-2091, November.
    2. David Robins & Jason Holmes & Mary Stansbury, 2010. "Consumer health information on the Web: The relationship of visual design and perceptions of credibility," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 13-29, January.
    3. Teun Lucassen & Jan Maarten Schraagen, 2011. "Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1232-1242, July.
    4. Teun Lucassen & Jan Maarten Schraagen, 2011. "Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1232-1242, July.
    5. David Robins & Jason Holmes & Mary Stansbury, 2010. "Consumer health information on the Web: The relationship of visual design and perceptions of credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 13-29, January.
    6. Jim Giles, 2005. "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7070), pages 900-901, December.
    7. Kari Kelton & Kenneth R. Fleischmann & William A. Wallace, 2008. "Trust in digital information," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(3), pages 363-374, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi, 2019. "Chat now… Examining the variables influencing the use of online live chat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 55-67.
    2. Wonchan Choi, 2020. "Older adultsʼ credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1295-1307, November.
    3. Devan Ray Donaldson & Paul Conway, 2015. "User conceptions of trustworthiness for digital archival documents," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2427-2444, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devan Ray Donaldson & Paul Conway, 2015. "User conceptions of trustworthiness for digital archival documents," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2427-2444, December.
    2. Kostagiolas, Petros & Korfiatis, Nikolaos & Kourouthanasis, Panos & Alexias, Georgios, 2014. "Work-related factors influencing doctors search behaviors and trust toward medical information resources," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 80-88.
    3. Fons Wijnhoven, 2012. "The Hegelian inquiring system and a critical triangulation tool for the Internet information slave: A design science study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1168-1182, June.
    4. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi, 2019. "Chat now… Examining the variables influencing the use of online live chat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 55-67.
    5. Franco Valdez, Ana Dolores & Valdez Cervantes, Alfonso & Motyka, Scott, 2018. "Beauty is truth: The effects of inflated product claims and website interactivity on evaluations of retailers' websites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 67-74.
    6. Sheng Tun Li & Thuong Thi Pham & Hui Chi Chuang & Zhi-Wei Wang, 2016. "Does reliable information matter? Towards a trustworthy co-created recommendation model by mining unboxing reviews," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 71-99, February.
    7. Aljukhadar, Muhammad & Senecal, Sylvain, 2016. "The user multifaceted expertise: Divergent effects of the website versus e-commerce expertise," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 322-332.
    8. Zaiton Hassan & Norhayati Hussin & Hasnah Hashim & Nurul Syfa Mohd Tokiran, 2020. "Information Seeking in Knowledge Society: Choose Right from Wrong," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 151-158, March.
    9. Yong Fang & Wenli Zhang & Hua Hu & Jiayi Zhou & Dianliang Xiao & Shaojie Li, 2022. "Adaptive Aging Safety of Guidance Marks in Rail Transit Connection Systems Based on Eye Movement Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    10. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    11. Wei Luo & Julia Adams & Hannah Brueckner, 2018. "The Ladies Vanish? American Sociology and the Genealogy of its Missing Women on Wikipedia," Working Papers 20180012, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Jan 2018.
    12. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Lanfei Shi & Siva Viswanathan, 2023. "Optional Verification and Signaling in Online Matching Markets: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1603-1621, December.
    14. Aaltonen, Aleksi Ville & Seiler, Stephan, 2014. "Quantifying spillovers in open source content production: evidence from Wikipedia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60284, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Charles Ayoubi & Boris Thurm, 2023. "Knowledge diffusion and morality: Why do we freely share valuable information with Strangers?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 75-99, January.
    16. Demidov, Denis & Frahm, Klaus M. & Shepelyansky, Dima L., 2020. "What is the central bank of Wikipedia?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    17. Suddaby, Roy & Ganzin, Max & Minkus, Alison, 2017. "Craft, magic and the re-enchantment of the world," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 285-296.
    18. Hervé, Fabrice & Zouaoui, Mohamed & Belvaux, Bertrand, 2019. "Noise traders and smart money: Evidence from online searches," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-149.
    19. Kristine L. Nowak & Rory McGloin, 2014. "The Influence of Peer Reviews on Source Credibility and Purchase Intention," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Nicolas Jullien, 2012. "What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)," Post-Print hal-00857208, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:64:y:2013:i:2:p:254-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.