IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v15y1964i1p26-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The notion of relevance (I)

Author

Listed:
  • Donald J. Hillman

Abstract

Analysis of the problems of defining the mutual relevancies of queries and document‐collections indicates that they essentially involve the problem of conceptual relatedness. In order to consider the latter problem, the question of concept‐formation is first discussed, which in turn requires a definition of concept. An extensional interpretation is suggested whereby a concept is associated with a class of conceptually‐similar documents. Users' similarity‐judgments then provide the empirical data for formal definitions of concept and conceptual relatedness. It is found, however, that certain very general difficulties rule out the possibility of defining concepts and their relatedness by the method proposed. Since this method is based on human relevance‐judgments, it seems a natural one to adopt, so that its collapse has serious practical and theoretical consequences. An alternative approach is therefore proposed whose elaboration will form Part II of this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald J. Hillman, 1964. "The notion of relevance (I)," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 26-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:15:y:1964:i:1:p:26-34
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090150107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090150107
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.5090150107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:15:y:1964:i:1:p:26-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.