IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v45y1994i3p186-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: An exploratory analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart A. Sutton

Abstract

This article examines the information seeking and evaluative behavior of attorneys as they search the corpus of law for primary authority in order to solve context sensitive legal issues. First, the dynamic mental models attorneys construct of the law as expressed in its published artifacts is explored. The relevance judgment of cases is then explicated in terms of these models. The conclusion reached is that relevance judgments shift along a knowledge continuum depending on the status of the attorney's mental model, and that the factors underlying these judgments are complex, multidimensional, and knowable. Current empirical research into the retrieval effectiveness of two full‐text legal databases is evaluated in light of the behavioral theory and mental models developed. The implications of attorney information seeking behavior for future information retrieval system design for this domain are also explored. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart A. Sutton, 1994. "The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: An exploratory analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(3), pages 186-200, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:45:y:1994:i:3:p:186-200
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:33.0.CO;2-F
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:33.0.CO;2-F
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:33.0.CO;2-F?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:45:y:1994:i:3:p:186-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.