Antitrust Limits on Patent Settlements: A New Approach
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1111/joie.12288
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Jing-Yuan Chiou & Richard Schmidtke, 2012. "Revisiting Antitrust Limits to Probabilistic Patent Disputes: Strategic Entry and Asymmetric Information," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 425-456.
- Shapiro, Carl, 2003.
"Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements,"
RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(2), pages 391-411, Summer.
- Shapiro, Carl, 2001. "Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt87s5j911, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Carl Shapiro, 2003. "Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements," Law and Economics 0303004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Hovenkamp, Erik & Lemus, Jorge, 2018. "Delayed entry settlements at the patent office," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 30-38.
- A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Law and Economics," Handbook of Law and Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 2.
- Hugo Hopenhayn & Gerard Llobet & Matthew Mitchell, 2006.
"Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents, and Buyouts,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(6), pages 1041-1068, December.
- Gerard Llobet & Hugo Hopenhayn & Matthew Mitchell, 2000. "Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents and Buyouts," Working Papers wp2000_0012, CEMFI.
- Gerard Llobet & Hugo Hopenhayn & Matthew Mitchell, 2003. "Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents and Buyouts," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000682, David K. Levine.
- Llobet, G. & Hopenhayn, H. & Mitchell, M., 2000. "Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents and Buyouts," Papers 0012, Centro de Estudios Monetarios Y Financieros-.
- Hugo A. Hopenhayn & Gerard Llobet & Matthew F. Mitchell, 2000. "Rewarding sequential innovators: prizes, patents and buyouts," Staff Report 273, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
- Gabriel Carroll, 2017. "Robustness and Separation in Multidimensional Screening," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 453-488, March.
- Fiona Scott Morton & Carl Shapiro, 2016.
"Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?,"
Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 89-133.
- Fiona Scott Morton & Carl Shapiro, 2015. "Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 16, pages 89-133, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Fiona Scott Morton & Carl Shapiro, 2015. "Patent Assertions: Are We Any Closer to Aligning Reward to Contribution?," NBER Working Papers 21678, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gabriel Carroll, 2019. "Robustness in Mechanism Design and Contracting," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 139-166, August.
- Jay Pil Choi, 2005. "Live and Let Live: A Tale of Weak Patents," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(2-3), pages 724-733, 04/05.
- William D. Nordhaus, 1967. "The Optimal Life of a Patent," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 241, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Michael J. Meurer, 1989. "The Settlement of Patent Litigation," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 20(1), pages 77-91, Spring.
- A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Law and Economics," Handbook of Law and Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Mark Schankerman & Florian Schuett, 2022.
"Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare,"
The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(4), pages 2101-2148.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Other publications TiSEM 71ffc853-44e7-4117-ac82-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Other publications TiSEM 9e661f68-5210-4ca7-8b2f-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2022. "Patent screening, innovation, and welfare," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," CEPR Discussion Papers 15301, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Discussion Paper 2020-024, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Discussion Paper 2020-024, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
- Rockett, Katharine, 2010.
"Property Rights and Invention,"
Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 315-380,
Elsevier.
- Rockett, K, 2008. "Property Rights and Invention," Economics Discussion Papers 2857, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
- Bertrand Chopard & Thomas Cortade & Eric Langlais, 2014.
"On patent strength, litigation costs, and patent disputes under alternative damage rules,"
Working Papers
hal-04141316, HAL.
- Bertrand Chopard & Thomas Cortade & Eric Langlais, 2014. "On patent strength, litigation costs, and patent disputes under alternative damage rules," EconomiX Working Papers 2014-41, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
- Tuomas Takalo, 2012.
"Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies,"
Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 1, pages 157-167.
- Takalo, Tuomas, 2009. "Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies," Discussion Papers 1185, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- Takalo, Tuomas, 2013. "Rationales and instruments for public innovation policies," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 1/2013, Bank of Finland.
- Hong Luo & Julie Holland Mortimer, 2017.
"Copyright Enforcement: Evidence from Two Field Experiments,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 499-528, June.
- Hong Luo & Julie Holland Mortimer, 2016. "Copyright Enforcement: Evidence from Two Field Experiments," NBER Working Papers 22082, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hong Luo & Julie Holland Mortimer, 2016. "Copyright Enforcement: Evidence from Two Field Experiments," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 907, Boston College Department of Economics.
- Bertrand Chopard & Thomas Cortade & Eric Langlais, 2013.
"Damage rules and the patent hold-up problem : An analysis of Article L. 615-7,"
EconomiX Working Papers
2013-37, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
- Bertrand Chopard & Thomas Cortade & Eric Langlais, 2013. "Damage rules and the patent hold-up problem : An analysis of Article L. 615-7," Working Papers hal-04141167, HAL.
- He, Leshui, 2020. "A theory of pre-filing settlement and patent assertion entities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
- Thomas D. Jeitschko & Byung-Cheol Kim, 2013.
"Signaling, Learning, and Screening Prior to Trial: Informational Implications of Preliminary Injunctions,"
The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(5), pages 1085-1113, October.
- Thomas D. Jeitschko & Byung-Cheol Kim, 2011. "Signaling, Learning and Screening Prior to Trial: Informational Implications of Preliminary Injunctions," EAG Discussions Papers 201102, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
- Bogdan Genchev & Julie Holland Mortimer, 2016.
"Empirical Evidence on Conditional Pricing Practices,"
NBER Working Papers
22313, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bogdan Genchev & Julie Holland Mortimer, 2016. "Empirical Evidence on Conditional Pricing Practices," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 908, Boston College Department of Economics.
- Joseph Farrell & Carl Shapiro, 2008.
"How Strong Are Weak Patents?,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1347-1369, September.
- Farrell, Joseph & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "How Strong Are Weak Patents?," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt8vg425vj, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Mitchell, Matthew & Zhang, Yuzhe, 2012.
"Shared Rights and Technological Progress,"
MPRA Paper
36537, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Yuzhe Zhang & Matthew Mitchell, 2013. "Shared Rights and Technological Progress," 2013 Meeting Papers 678, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Andrzej Baniak & Peter Grajzl, 2017.
"Optimal Liability when Consumers Mispredict Product Usage,"
American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 202-243.
- Andrzej Baniak & Peter Grajzl, 2016. "Optimal Liability when Consumers Mispredict Product Usage," CESifo Working Paper Series 5903, CESifo.
- Mostafa Beshkar & Jee-Hyeong Park, 2017. "Dispute Settlement with Second-Order Uncertainty: The Case of International Trade Disputes," CAEPR Working Papers 2017-010, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
- Menusch Khadjavi, 2018.
"Deterrence works for criminals,"
European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 165-178, August.
- Khadjavi, Menusch, 2014. "Deterrence works for criminals," Kiel Working Papers 1938, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Khadjavi, Menusch, 2018. "Deterrence Works for Criminals," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 234046, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Sophie Bienenstock, 2019. "The Deterrent Effect of French Liability Law: the Example of Abusive Contract Terms," Post-Print hal-03222207, HAL.
- Alberto Galasso & Hong Luo, 2018. "Punishing Robots: Issues in the Economics of Tort Liability and Innovation in Artificial Intelligence," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 493-504, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Matteo Migheli & Giovanni Battista Ramello, 2018. "The market of academic attention," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 113-133, January.
- Dennis, Richard & Kirsanova, Tatiana, 2016.
"Computing Markov-Perfect Optimal Policies In Business-Cycle Models,"
Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(7), pages 1850-1872, October.
- Dennis, Richard & Kirsanova, Tatiana, 2014. "Computing Markov-Perfect Optimal Policies in Business-Cycle Models," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-64, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
- Richard Dennis & Tatiana Kirsanova, 2014. "Computing Markov-Perfect Optimal Policies in Business-Cycle Models," Working Papers 2014_21, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
- Fluet, Claude, 2020.
"L'économie de la preuve judiciaire,"
L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 96(4), pages 585-620, Décembre.
- Fluet, Claude, 2010. "L’économie de la preuve judiciaire," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 86(4), pages 451-486, décembre.
- Claude Fluet, 2011. "L'économie de la preuve judiciaire," Cahiers de recherche 1102, CIRPEE.
- Claude Denys Fluet, 2011. "L'économie de la preuve judiciaire," CIRANO Working Papers 2011s-18, CIRANO.
- Goerke, Laszlo & Neugart, Michael, 2015.
"Lobbying and dismissal dispute resolution systems,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 50-62.
- Goerke, Laszlo & Neugart, Michael, 2015. "Lobbying and dismissal dispute resolution systems," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 67591, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:70:y:2022:i:2:p:257-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.